Preview

Phillips vs Panasonic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phillips vs Panasonic
Philips vs Panasonic; Student Casework. Ever since two Dutch brothers lifted Eindhoven out the darkness in 1892, a new style of living emerged with the industrial revolution. Philips - due to the full name of the two brothers - is a world famous company throughout the world. This firm is principally characterized as a technological company which is “focused on improving people’s lives through meaningful innovation in the areas of healthcare, consumer lifestyle and lighting.” (Philips’ official website, 2014)
Steps after steps, during all the 19th century, Philips had become the leading consumer electronics company in spite of the succession of many CEO with different vision to manage. The period of postwar era is relevant to explain this phenomenon of constant evolution.
Nevertheless, the actual period of globalization has changing the face of this I.T (information and technology) sector by the arrival of some Asian companies like Samsung or Sony. Nowadays, Philips should now compete against them, especially one company, Panasonic - originally call Matsushita - which has a similar range of product.

This student casework brings an analysis of these two companies which have established each a different form of organization. The actuals CEO, Frans van Houten for Philips and Kazuhiro Tsuga for Panasonic, at both companies were taking their own way to success by different strategic initiatives.
The first part of this student casework deals about the competences that Philips had built after the Second World War and the challenges they have met during this period. Then, the second part is focus on its rival, Panasonic, which is now the most serious competitor against them. A correlation follows this part in order to understand the evolution between both companies. Finally, personal reflections propose some recommendations about the future of these two firms.

A long construction of Philips’ Organization

Frans Van Houten is the tenth Philip’s CEO since



References: Bartlett C.A, 2009. Philips versus Matsushita: The Competitive Battle Continues. Harvard Business School. Lasserre, 2003. Global Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan. First edition. Official Philip’s website, 2014. Link avaible at http://www.philips.com/global?locale_org=sv_se

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Samsung, established in 1938, is one of the world’s top 10 electronics companies and is known as an electronic leader in its industry ("Samsung.com", 1995-2014). Samsung has a commitment to cost effective processes, spearheading new platforms through innovative technologies, enriching people’s lives and maintaining its position as a “digital leader” ("Samsung.com", 1995-2014).…

    • 1531 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sony and Matshisuta

    • 1761 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Frist of all, the differences between Matsushita and Sony’s products is one of the primary reason that makes their decision various. In the reading, it reveals that Matsuhita was focusing more on the low-tech products such as NN-MX20WF (their new model mocrowave oven), DVD player, automatic washers and 29-inch TVs. One the contrary, Sony’s product is more distinctive and it emphasizes more on developing new technology. Indeed, Sony has successfully at commercializing new technologies into innoative products such as the transistor radio, tape recorder, Beta- Max video recorder, CD, Walkman, minidisk, DVD and even camera and camcorder. In another words, Matsushita just centrated on being customer intimate but Sony differenticated itself by innovation. Therefore, as we can notice, the functional products of Matsushita have low demand uncertainties, long product life cycle, low profit marginsm low product variety, low stockout cost and low obsolescence but the innovative products of Sony have high demand uncertainties, short product life cycle, high profit margins, high stockout cost and high obsolescence.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samsung

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From its inception as a small export business in Taegu, Korea, Samsung has grown to become one of the world’s leading electronics companies, specializing in digital appliances and media, semiconductors, memory, and system integration. Today Samsung's innovative and top quality products and processes are world recognized. This timeline captures the major milestones in Samsung's history, showing how the company expanded its product lines and reach, grew its revenue and market share, and has followed its mission of making life better for consumers around the world. (SAMSUNG All rights reserved)…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After entering into an agreement with General Electrics in 1919, giving each company the use of the others patents, Philips began evolving to a decentralized sales organization. It founded independent marketing companies in 14 countries in Europe, China, Brazil and Australia and also broadened its product line significantly. However the great depression which brought trade barriers and high tariffs with it, forced Philips to build local production facilities to protect its foreign sales of these products. Philips had a shared but competitive leadership by commercial and technical…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phillips

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. How did Philips become the leading consumer electronics company in the world in the postwar era? What distinctive competencies did they build? What distinctive incompetencies?…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philips vs. Matsushita

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. How did Philips become the most successful company in its business during an era when scores of electrical engineering companies were being formed? What impediments and disabilities did Philips' strategic and organizational capabilities bring with them?…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout their long histories, N.V. Philips (Netherlands) and Matsushita Electric (Japan) had followed very different strategies and emerged with very different organizational capabilities. Philips built its success on a worldwide portfolio of responsive national organizations, while Matsushita based its global competitiveness on its centralized, highly efficient operations in Japan.…

    • 7249 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this case, the author introduced Philips and Matsushita’s background, organizational development, reorganization, changes and challenges. Philips was founded by Gerard Philips in 1892; it developed a traditional of caring for works from this time. Philips only made light-bulbs firstly and begun to broaden its products lines in 1918. It developed the NOs, the NOs had important positions among the management levels and also they had special attractiveness. From late 1960s, Philips’s seven chairmen experimented with reorganizing the company to deal with its…

    • 2792 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillips vs Masushita

    • 1223 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1899 Anton hired the companies first export manager and the company was sell into markets in Japan, Australia, Canada, Brazil, and Russia. By 1900 Philips was the third largest light-bulb producer in Europe. By 1912 the lamp industry stated showing an overcapacity of companies so Philips started building sales organizations in the United States, Canada and France, while all other function remained centralized in Eindhoven. In many foreign countries Philips created joint venture with local to gain market acceptance. In 1919 Phillips entered into partnership with General Electric giving each company use of the others patents as well as divining the world into three spheres of influence. Philips had also broaden its production into vacuum tubes, x-ray tubes and radios.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Guiding Coalition

    • 4427 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The CEO was a remarkable individual. Being 20 percent leader, 40 percent manager, and the rest financial genius, he had guided his company successfully by making shrewd acquisitions and running a tight ship. When his industry changed in the late 1980s, he tried to transform the firm to cope with the new conditions. And he did so with the same style he had been using for fifteen years that of a monarch, with advisors.…

    • 4427 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philips vs Matsushita

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matsuhita is an organization with various capabilities, based on its structure, the market environment and even its corporate culture. The company has been established whereby the organizational structure is embedded in its capabilities and competencies. The first obvious example is Matsushita’s highly centralized mode of production which dictates global operations unlike its competitor in the electronics market, a conglomerate, Philips, who has very little centralized mode of coordination. Matsushita’s management style was very traditional, since it was established. It is believed that they chose this form of structure and structure because of the nature of the market the organization serves. Their control system seemed to be a slightly highly formalized. Although competition was encouraged amongst all product divisions, their operations still stayed highly centralized. As Ouchi pointed out, a company that streamlines its business towards the output/market-based system in any economy, there are some characteristics that can only support a very centralized mode of production. In the case of Matsushita, formalization is high. “Employees are rarely given the opportunity to participate in decision making, but they maybe offered a degree of flexibility in respect of how target is achieved” (Ouchi, 1979). The latter can be backed up with Matsushita incentive of allowing employees across divisions but they were not allowed to contribute towards any other significant decisions made within the organization.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands is a diversified Health and Well-being company, focused on improving people’s lives through timely innovations. As a world leader in healthcare, lifestyle and lighting, Philips integrates technologies and design into people-centric solutions, based on fundamental customer insights and the brand promise of “sense and simplicity”.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After reading the case of the “Paradoxical Twins Acme and Omega Electronics”, I found Both Acme and Omega produce similar products and offer similar services. Acme president John Tyler is a very tough going individual and he is portrayed to be an autocratic individual because there is one way communication in Acme. The case provides an opportunity to evaluate both Acme and Omega’s organization structure of a business. Both companies used to have the same organizational structure but after they were sold to different investors, as a consequence of this, each company has its own procedures and company policies. Following are the same facts about both the company mentioned in the case after they became the separate business entity.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philips Worlwide

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - Philips is a dutch diversified technology company headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands. The brand was founded in 1891 by Gerard Philips. Now, it is one of the largest electronics companies in the world (People: 122.000 - Countries: 60)…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    A ll organizations possess operations functions of some sort because every one of them provides product and or services to its customer. According to Slack, Chambers & Johnston (2010), the operations function actually ranks as one of the three core functions in any company. As a central function in any organization, it produces the output required that the company needs to stay in business. What makes operations management so important is the critical role it plays in making the business competitive by enabling the business to respond to customer needs and also in developing capabilities needed to keep ahead of competitors in the future.…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics