Philosophies Of Decriminalization

The author will attempt to briefly describe the philosophies of decriminalization, legalization and drug treatment. I will conclude with my opinion regarding the good and bad about these said philosophies.
Crime Reduction
Decriminalization
The philosophy behind decriminalization is regulating and reducing the severity of penalties (Dolgon, Baker, 2011). Decriminalization, legalization, and drug treatment are all approaches to the nation’s war on drugs and ever growing jail compounds. Decriminalization reflects changing social and moral perspectives. A general public may come to the view that a demonstration is not destructive, ought to never again be criminalized, or is generally not a matter to be addressed by the criminal equity framework.
Cases of topic which have been the subject of changing perspectives on guiltiness after some time in different social orders and nations include: gambling, abortion, breastfeeding out in the open, willful extermination, homosexuality, polygamy, prostitution, steroid use in sport. While decriminalized acts are no more drawn out wrongdoings under neighborhood or state law, they may even now be the subject of punishments under federal law; for instance, a money related fine set up of a criminal allegation for the ownership of a decriminalized sedate. This ought to be appeared differently in relation to legitimization, which expels all or most lawful impediments from a formerly illicit act.
Legalization
This philosophy is about removing a prohibition against something which is currently not legal.
In this case were speaking of certain drugs deemed useful for medicinal purposes. Legalization is a procedure regularly connected to what are regarded as, by those working towards authorization, as harmless violations, of which one illustration is the utilization of illicit medications. Legitimization ought to be contrasted differently in relation to decriminalization, which expels criminal allegations from an activity. Authorization bestows more administrative control. Advocates of libertarianism bolster legitimization of what they see as harmless wrongdoings, for example, recreational medication and alcohol use, weapon proprietorship, and prostitution. In the U. S. migration setting, the expression authorization is casually used to allude to a procedure whereby a man illicitly exhibit in the nation can get legal changeless habitation. The US law has given the sanctioning technique known as registry, which essentially requires the candidate to demonstrate that he has consistently lived in the nation since before a specific indicated registry date and is not unacceptable on different
grounds.
Drug treatment
Often why drug treatment works centers around relationships. Segregated moderation has a tendency to be either brief or exceptionally unacceptable. One of the blessings of coming to treatment is the interference of the segregation of addiction. It is a colossal alleviation to at last discover a place where reality can be told and individuals get it. Often times treatment is effective in preventing crime simply because the people are pulled away from the world they once lived in and subjected to a world that is absent of drugs and the use of them. This can cause individuals to reconsider their quality of life in contrast to the quality of life they experienced while doing drugs.
Conclusion
My final reflections on this subject of crime prevention and reduction.
These philosophies have great potential to work. However, my main concern is not whether or not decriminalization and legalization could be a good thing, rather, my concern is should they be a good thing? For instance, legalization of marijuana indeed has proven to curb criminal activity simply because the government said it is no longer illegal. In my opinion, I believe in the broken window effect that states that if we start making things that were initially illegal, no longer illegal, then the rest will follow. Before long, many illegal acts and substances will start to become legal thus sending a message to people that if they continue to conduct illegal crimes, that the government will at some point make that crime legal to keep from overcrowding jails. This all is up to interpretation as many of the laws are. The government in fact deems the legalization of marijuana is a minor crime among other crimes such as murder. However, who is to say that at some point, that certain violent crimes will become a right and not an illegal
law.