Preview

Philosophy 8

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
485 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy 8
Philosophy 116 O’Connor
November 13 2014
Patrick Johnson
The Problem of Evil I would like to do chapter III for the remainder of the semester because it’s an extension of what we have already done in this course. Our class has previously discussed the problem of evil when examining goodness, one of God’s essential attributes discussed in chapter I and other readings. Therefore, we’ll have some prior knowledge when revisiting this issue. Studying chapter III will also be beneficial for us to expand on what we already know of God’s goodness, given the evil in the world, with more readings and arguments from different philosophers. Chapter III focuses on the problem of evil. The table of contents shows it contains discussions on God and evil, evil with regard to varieties of atheism, and free will with evil. The titles and descriptions of this chapter show how it relates to things this class has already discussed; God’s goodness with respect to evil, and free will. These topics are therefore a continuation of that which we have already learned and are familiar with. Thus, studying chapter III is a good way to continue with this course; it contains topics our class has previously come across. The problem of evil is one we have encountered in readings such as McCloskey’s “The Nature and Attributes of God,” and Clarke’s “Can God Do Evil,” from chapter I of the textbook. With these readings, we have obtained a basic understanding of whether God’s goodness is to be considered necessitated/voluntary, and whether His omnipotence contains evil. Free will was another discussion we previously had with regard to God’s omniscience, as seen in both Boethius and McCloskey. Therefore, having some knowledge of these topics before continuing on with them will help us understand them better. Examining more content of the same discussions will help our class evaluate the concepts, materials, and issues better. By studying chapter III, we’ll have access to more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biology 111 is a study of the structure and function of the human body. The course covers in detail the human body from its biochemical and sub cellular aspects through tissues. Special emphasis is given the integumentary, skeletal, muscular, nervous, and endocrine systems. The lecture and laboratory are correlated to provide an overview of the interrelationships of normal human anatomy and physiology. Biology 111 meets the general education requirement for group II-science.…

    • 3794 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He begins to ponder and tear at the origin of evil. He asks “where did it from”, “why is it still allowed? Bayle acknowledges that God is supposed to be wholly good and powerful. However, despites god’s power and goodness, god has allowed evil to run free. Bayle addresses in this essay the questions the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus brought to light. Epicurus states that God is either “willing to remove evil and cannot; or he can and is unwilling; … or else he is both willing and able” (Bayle p 169). However, these options bring to light an idea that is not so comfortable about God. If he is willing to remove evil but can’t to address the problem of evil, then God is not all powerful. If he can and is unwilling, then he is not good, for whom that is good would want to put his children through the trials of evil? Bayle suggests that if God is willing and able to remove evil, then why does he not remove it? In the story Candide, Voltaire agrees with the Manichean view and shows it through his writing. There are several instances where a God of Good is present in Candide’s life, and then the God of Evil interferes…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The explanation for why someone or something is evil can not be easily defined, as the answer may vary based on a person’s psychological thought process or intellectual reasoning. The justification of this paper is to discuss Peter Van Inwagen and his philosophical response to the argument from evil, as well as his free will defense theory for the answer to this complication. I will carefully evaluate the two standard objections to his solution and offer my personal opinion of rather or not he offers a successful resolution for this universal problem.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protocol paper 1

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary: In the chapter, "The problem of evil," James Rachles and Stuart Rachles arise the problem of evil by Job’s story. Although logical problem of evil are distinguished evidentiary problem of evil, both of them are play a key role religious belief. The Authors were not focus on used the problem of evil to prove or disprove God’ existence. But they elaborated on the response to various ideas about how to reconcile God with evil. According to authors, none of them were successful.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: The conflict behind the idea of evil is why a perfect God would allow evil to exist on earth.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    philosophy 3.2

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    >>> What is Taylor's drug addiction thought experiment?how do these two experiments undermine traditional compatibilism?…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is a concept of much debate. I base my conception of free will on Erasmus's definition. Erasmus argues that free will is “The human will by which man is able to direct himself towards to turn away from what leads to eternal salvation”(6). My conception of free will alters the last clause and instead substitutes, man’s ability to direct himself towards and turn away from success, in addition to having the freedom to define such success. In this paper I will argue that man’s will is never completely free; it is always dependent to some extent on God. I will analyze the philosophical theories of Erasmus, Luther, Descartes, Spinoza, and the movie The Adjustment Bureau, and the arguments they they make in their…

    • 2353 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro: In this article, I first presented the Free Will argument. Then I showed how it fails by questioning the necessity of natural evils. After that, I defended my response against a likely rebuttal.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As my second part of the final essay I chose the questions from chapter 13. I will discuss the following questions in this essay: Is it possible that what one feels about the problem of evil depends largely on one’s prior beliefs on the existence of God? Isn’t it likely that a theist will find a solution to the problem? Isn’t it likely that an atheist will see it as disproving God’s existence? What side of the fence are you on concerning the question of God’s existence, and what difference does it make in your own view of the problem of evil? First I want to quote Hume and the most famous way the problem of evil is stated: “Is he willing to prevent evil,…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Problem of Evil

    • 1445 Words
    • 54 Pages

    Throughout the article he considers several aspects highlighting how they prove and disprove his thesis. After considering the arguments I will provide my own opinion on the analyses and the arguments provided about the existence of evil and God. The author, Peter Van Inwagen’s position on The Argument of Evil is that because of…

    • 1445 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy 102

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Do you believe it is still possible that new musical instruments could be invented and widely distributed?…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays