Preview

Philosophy Essay; State of Nature

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1412 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy Essay; State of Nature
Over time history has shown that in order to maintain a functional working society, man needs to adhere to a certain set of laws and rules that act as guidelines for their self-preservation. This theory is defined as a social contract. The philosophers that specialise in this topic are known as social theorists. They argue on what is the most successful social contract theory in order for society to move forwards economically and industrially. The concept of ruling by majority is one that is often discussed between philosophers based on it's effectiveness as the basis for forming a government. Other theories that are used to challenge or support this are the influence of democracy and the problems with dictatorship. Ultimately each theory is brought back to what is best for the people living in that society.

Rousseau believed that in order for a society to be justified it must 'best affirm the individual freedom of all citizens'. In Rousseau's theory of a state of nature, he claims that human beings were once able to live 'uncorrupted by society' and could essentially do as they wished. Within all states of nature, when conflicts being to arise each society needs some form of structured government to offer protection and security. For this theory to be successful, each individual must relinquish a portion of their freedom for choice in order to gain protection and maintain physical freedom within their society. Rousseau believed in a 'collective will' theory where the people are represented by a 'sovereign' who expresses the general will that aims for the common good. The sovereign is not one singular person although they defend the rights and desires of individuals. However, Plato believed that the theory of giving the people the choice over the actions of their society cannot be successful as it is assumes that they have the ability to determine what is the best decision. By assuming this one is not considering that when making a decision, people are often
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Theories Of Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The Theories Of Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Origins Of Inequality By Jean-Jacques Rousseau
    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Origins Of Inequality By Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    In his 1755 discourse on 'The Origins of Inequality', Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues his conception of the natural state of mankind, and its subsequent corruption throughout the progress towards civil society. Whilst Rousseau's idealism can be targeted as unrealistic, and his criticisms of the state potentially destabilising to certain societies, ultimately he makes a valid philosophical argument against tyranny which helps found republican political values.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Declaration Of Rights Of Man And Citizen, By Jean Jacques Rousseau
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing The Declaration Of Rights Of Man And Citizen, By Jean Jacques Rousseau

    Rousseau’s makes it clear that “the only will dominating government should be the general will or the law.” The National Assembly of France used this principle in the sixth listed right in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen which reads that “the law is an expression of the general will.” The general will, as Rousseau states, is for the best of the common interest of the country. The king will not always act in the best interest of his country, so it is imperative to form a constitutional monarchy that seeks to act in the best interest of the general…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract

    Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Rousseau And Jefferson
    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing Rousseau And Jefferson

    Rousseau says, “no man has natural authority over his fellows, and since Might can produce no Right, the only foundation left for legitimate authority in human societies is Agreement” (60). Therefore, readers can understand that there is no natural slave or ruler, and it is people who select their rulers after they have had “agreements” with their rulers. On the other hand, Jefferson writes, “that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (78). At this passage, Jefferson explains that governments are established by people who are “governed” based on their agreements with the governments. Moreover, he adds, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness” (78). At this point, Jefferson has expanded Rousseau’s ideas and states clearly that once the “agreements” between the people and rulers are broken, the rulers can be overthrown, and people have rights to select a new ruler. Jefferson later supports his expansion by presenting…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson and Rousseau Influences Essay Example
    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jefferson and Rousseau Influences Essay Example

    Jefferson sees to Rousseau in justifying colonial claims to independence. Jefferson writes, "Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it…" (Jefferson 80). This reflects Rousseau's thinking that, [the only foundation left for legitimate authority in human societies is Agreement] (Rousseau 61). Rousseau argues that all society exists because…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Locke And Rousseau
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similarities Between Locke And Rousseau

    After explaining how the state of nature evolved into civil society when people began to rely on each other for resources, Rousseau concluded that the social contact that made civil society possible is more important that the individuals who created it. Although civil society created inequality, it also created freedom, morality, and rationality, which make people human. On the other hand, Locke explained that the state of nature evolved into civil society because people wanted to protect their property and liberties. He concluded that civil society exists to benefit the people; if the present government fails to do so it should be overthrown.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Revolutionary Changes in the Atlantic World, 1750–1850
    • 10935 Words
    • 44 Pages

    Revolutionary Changes in the Atlantic World, 1750–1850

    Scientific Revolution to the study of human society. One way of doing so was to…

    • 10935 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Madison And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Innovative Ideas Of Democracy: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Innovative Ideas Of Democracy: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau

    Rousseau added to the idea of democracy by creating the idea that people are born good but can be corrupted by society, therefore they need to make the laws themselves and willingly obey them. He believed that if left to itself, society would follow these equally created laws and society would maintain its naturally born goodness. He believes that only the general society is capable enough to run themselves with laws created by the people for the people. Much of these ideas are still around today combined with other ideas in our own…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ideas Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Through The Lens Of Thomas Jefferson
    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Ideas Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Through The Lens Of Thomas Jefferson

    In Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's “the Origin of Civil Society, Rousseau presents Ideas that, in his society, were considered very radical. He points out that a Society was in a natural state and that when we were that we were born free, and when we subject ourselves to a king, he must hold up certain rights and protect them, and in return they give him power, what Rosseau called the “Social Contract” . Thomas jefferson 's “Declaration of Independence” is Dirrived from Rousseau 's text about “rights” and “the Social Contract.” The ideas that Rousseau has written about are greatly applied to the ideas that Thomas…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Was The Difference Between Enlightenment And Jean Jacques Rousseau
    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Was The Difference Between Enlightenment And Jean Jacques Rousseau

    He also thinks citizens should have the right to revolt and government should always give and protect our rights. However, the Enlightenment thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau, feels we protect our own rights by working together. In class we discussed how his belief is similar to the phrase: If we all have superpowers the no one has superpowers. We considered this phrase because if everyone were to have superpowers, then we wouldn't wish to have them anymore since everyone has them. Rousseau also stated we must use reason to give the individual rights of life, liberty, and property. Locke shows his views on liberty by inferring one should have the ability to choose who governs them, as well as having their freedom of religion protected. Rousseau expresses his conception toward liberty by explaining whatever the majority of the people want should become law and rules should be strictly enforced if the people are in…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Of The Majority Analysis
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tyranny Of The Majority Analysis

    This social “tyranny of the majority” comes from the enforcement of rules of conduct that are both unreasoned and strongly adhered to. The principle that guides the majority “to their opinions on the regulation of human conduct, is the feeling in each person’s mind that everybody should be required to act as he, and those with whom he sympathizes, would like them to act.” (On Liberty, 48). This feeling is dangerous to the enlightenment and romantic periods because it is taken to be self-justifying. This creates a very self biased view on the way that situations should be dealt with and can create harmful situations when it comes to problem solving within social order and the justice system. This gives the sense of every man for himself and this could create…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke the State of Nature
    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Locke the State of Nature

    In the chapter five of The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, John Locke expresses his opinion about property. According to the Bible, all human being is the descendants of Adam and Eve, which mean that this world is common to all humankind. However, in order to that the property is significant to people, the property must be your own private property. The individuals are different from the land and other properties. Everyone is entitled to the private rights; the personal private property may be obtained by the working, and the personal private property is out of the scope of the public property. Therefore, through manual labour, the public properties become privatization. Nevertheless, the privatization of public property is limited; the way to obtain the private property is only in the situation that does not damage others will be accepted by others. Only under such situation that people have provided appropriate resources to others, can they gain own properties to achieve their satisfactory goals through contribution and work. God gives treasure to humans, but does not look forward to seeing humans using it improperly. God expects humans to share and use the treasure in proper way and by their own work. How much treasure people should earn should be decided according to how much they contribute and need. However, it is not ethical to get properties by violating others. When people cannot implement or distribute natural resources in proper ways, others turn such resources into their own properties via ethically appropriate implementation. The right of gaining property from work is prior than land's public-owned status, since most of what people gain is via their hard work instead of natural resources. Above all, if people are willing to work on and properly implement public-owned resource properly, such work will give property as a return. In addition, John Locke indicates that the reason why currency came out…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Role and Responsibility of a Centralized Government of Control
    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Role and Responsibility of a Centralized Government of Control

    The birth and origin of a centralized government of control, or simply, a force that embraces as one, a body of living things and maintains stability and order within them can be stretched back to the earliest days of man. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau states in The Origin of Civil Society, “the earliest [and still intact] form of government is the family” (59), where the head of the family, or in Rousseau’s argument, the father has authority over his children and with it the duty to care for them and to supervise them. Rousseau further states that family is not only the oldest, but also the only natural form of society (59). The contradictory statement therefore deals with the growth and evolution of human kind from that primitive social order, the different structures of the centralized government of power that we encompass throughout the world today, no longer remain as simple as the earliest form, but it has indeed developed into a subject argued and contradicted by many. The theory of governments in current times cover a wide range of opinions and sub-theories depending on factors beyond reckoning, and even though there are plenty of popular political guidelines to choose from, very few actually have the potential to prevail.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics