Preview

Philosophy of God and What Is He Like

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy of God and What Is He Like
Best Explanations Approach – Existence of God is the best explanation for certain effects we see in the universe.
I can only prove what I can see, taste, hear – but electrons (we can’t see, taste or hear it); black holes (we can’t see, taste or hear) we just see the effects that we see that the best explanation is that there are electrons and black holes and god.

Defeasible – Possibly could be wrong. Defeater, if true could defeat the argument of God’s existence.

Cumulative Cases Approach – don’t believe any one argument gets us to the fact God exists. You have to combine a number of arguments together to make a strong case.

Minimalistic Argument – what are the minimal concepts that God exists – created universe, morally, personal, intellectual creator of the universe.

Arguments for God’s Existence

Classical Arguments – trace back to middle ages and ancient Greece
Ontological, Cosmological, Theological, and Moral
Ontological – controversial (Christians and non-christians)
Cosmological – God is the best explanation for the existence of the universe. Everything that exists has a cause. Arguing for the existence for a first cause – which we believe is God. Argument by itself just gets us to a first cause. Argument from Contingency – the universe is contingent – it is not necessary – does not have to exist, just does. If everything in the universe is contingent, than the universe itself is contingent.
Currently Contingent – like a light bulb – bulb is only lit when electricity runs through it – universe is currently contingent so something has to be making it contingent, what’s causing that, infinite regress of current causes.

Temporal Argument – Kolom – anything that begins to exist needs a cause.

Big Bang Model – universe began certain amount of time.
First cause – event causation (one event caused another);
Agent Cause – person initiates a new series of causes.

Theology – nestians – has intelligence in it’s design,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another argument that provides evidence for the existence of God is the Anthropic Principle. This idea states that the cosmos (i.e. the universe) was created for the sole purpose of creating and supporting intelligent life. F.R. Tennant proposed the idea, he summarised his opinion of the universe into one key quotation “as we look out into the universe and identify the many…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCloskey claims that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being.” He goes on to state that because there are beings in the universe that do not have any explanation for their existence, one can infer that there must be some “ultimate” being responsible. The original cause of being is necessary because contingency cannot be infinite. The cosmological argument is the basis for why we may question the existence of anything, but it is not a sufficient enough answer to the bigger question of an all-powerful ultimate…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these explain the existence of God through the study of Cosmology and the many findings by astrologists like Edwin Hubble, and simply what exists around society.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological argument is an argument that attempts to prove the existence of God, it is also known as the causation argument which argues that as all events require a cause, if the universe is an event it must have a cause and that cause is God.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept that there cannot be nothing and so must be something is due to the evidence we as human beings have experienced throughout our lives; every effect ever made has had a cause. Aquinas used the laws of Motion and Design to demonstrate how every action must have a correlating reaction, and related this to his argument for God being the first cause – the uncaused causer. This is laid out in the Cosmological Argument, taken directly from the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry;…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key idea in cosmological arguments is that the world, the universe, and everything in them are dependent on something other than themselves for their existence. In other words, cosmological arguments attempt to justify God's existence on the assumption that nothing can come from nothing, and that God must exist in order for anything to be here.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The cosmological argument for the existence of God. .... The first thing to note about the cosmological argument is that it is A Posteriori. ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In every war fought throughout the history of mankind, the dependence on weapons was highly sought after. From swords to guns, weaponry has progressed throughout the ages with each war fought. No other war has seen more advances in weaponry than World War II. Many of those advances made this war focused on artillery, land vehicles, naval ships and aircraft. These advances, although beneficial, have also led to more bloodshed on the battlefield because they can do a lot more damage than their previous versions. Understanding these advances helped the Allied Powers win over the Axis in many battles, but both sides contributed many advances in weaponry.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Cosmological Argument Premise 2 explains that everything cannot be a dependent living thing. William Rowe explains why the Principle of Sufficient reason is true, then premise 2 is also true. Rowe suggests that there has never been a self-existing living thing, but only an infinite series of dependent living things. In this case, every living thing has an explanation, because it is explained if a living thing that came before it then that caused its existence.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Does the universe exist? If the universe exists, what caused it to exist? The universe itself could not have created or caused itself. If the cause or explanation for the universe is something other than itself, what is that cause. If the universe is a contingent being, did other contingent beings cause it or did a non-contingent being cause the universe? Something caused the universe to exist. There was a First Cause. This First Cause has no beginning and no end, it is eternal. What could possibly be powerful enough to create the universe with all of its complexity and depth if not God? To say that contingent things just exist with no cause does not explain why they exist. Can a contingent being give an explanation for how or why it exists? If not, it follows that the only explanation is a non-contingent being began the process. The Cosmological Argument is not meant to give exhaustive proof for the existence of God. It is just a piece of the pie that encourages a…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics