Preview

Philosophy Paper- God and Suffering

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
854 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy Paper- God and Suffering
Nice Student
PHL 267
09/19/12
The reason for God-
Timothy Keller

“How could God Allow suffering” If God is good, why is there so much suffering and evil doing in the world today? Look at 9/11, why couldn’t God stop the terrorist’s from doing these awful things to our beautiful nation? At one point in our lives we all have experienced some sort of suffering, weather it may be the passing of a family member, getting robbed, not living in livable conditions, or just plain dislikes of your life. Through out our times of despair we ask our self “where was God when I suffered, Why didn’t he do anything about it?” the times we suffer we always cry out and ask for answers. Is their any reasoning for Pain and suffering? Timothy Keller touches on this subject in chapter two of his book “ The Reason for God”. Keller believes that these reasoning’s are unjustified and Evil and suffering isn’t evidence against god. For people today that go through the motions of life think that unjustified suffering is a “Philosophical Problem”. How can there be suffering if there is an all-powerful God? An undergrad English major, Hillary and her boyfriend speaks on the subject when interviewed by Keller. Hillary clearly states that she doesn’t believe in god “I just don’t believe in the God of Christianity “but her reasoning for it was that“ god allows terrible suffering in the world”. This is a perfect example of how people look at situations and expect God to do and be everything if he is so powerful. A philosopher named J.L. Makie makes a broad case against God in his book “ Mericale of Theism” agreeing with Hillary’s statement. Makie’s claim against God is that if there were an all-powerful god that is good, he wouldn’t just allow mediocre evil in the world. With that being said he comes to conclude that the “traditional good and powerful God” doesn’t exist. This reasoning is skeptical and bias. Just because you can’t visually see or view anything doesn’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?”…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A recurrent reason for someone's faith in God is because of their desire to be sheltered from the cruelties of their real lives and Mcbride’s mother certainly has a lot of pain built up inside of her. Mcbride picks up on these cues even as a child…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Sinners in the hands of an Angry God” was an influential sermon that described the “torments of Hell to be endured by sinners”(85). Jonathan Edwards used an appeal to fear to persuade the 18th century Puritans to repent their sins. This emotional sermon had powerful analogies and vivid imagery that made it effective.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Put yourself in Salem, Massachusetts back in 1692 being punished for the wicked games of witchcraft. Now imagine being preached at in a crowd full of awful sinners. Johnathan Edwards in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, tries to scare his readers into not sinning. He is also trying to persuade them to convert into pure Christians. Arthur Miller in, The Crucible compares McCarthyism in America to witchcraft in Salem. History was repeated when both Arthur Miller and Johnathan Edwards write the tales of the dark-spiritual world. Edwards shows pathos while Miller uses logos ethos and pathos.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Number a-7713

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If the world is full of horrors, does God really exist? At the beginning of the work it is clear that his belief in a benevolent God is unconditional, and he cannot imagine living without faith in a divine power, but this faith is traumatized by his experience during the…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As once a founding father of the United States, Benjamin Franklin once stated, “do not fear mistakes. You will know failure. Continue to reach out.” Though this quote might have been years later than 1741 during the time of the Great Awakening. Jonathan Edwards gave the inspiring speech “Sinners in The Hands of an Angry God” to puritans who left the church and left Edwards feeling that puritanism was in danger. He uses fear as a tactic to get the unfaithful puritans to rededicate their lives to God and gives them hope to repent for the mistakes they have made. Edwards uses frightful imagery, and violent then hopeful metaphors to get puritans who strayed away from strict religion to come back and have a second chance at a pure life.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem of Evil- Notes

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Antony Flew wrote that the biggest challenge to the believer is accepting that the existence of evil and suffering is a major problem that demands an adequate response. The problem faced by monotheists demands a solution, not of qualification; in which the nature of God is arbitrarily changed to suit different circumstances – this concept of God ‘dies the death of a thousand qualifications,’ but by the rational justification of God’s right to allow evil and suffering to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Voltaire’s poem he mentions that if God was as good as we believed him to be, he would not cause such pain and suffering. If God is all powerful and all loving as he is said to be why would he sit back and allow such devastation to occur instead of doing something to prevent such destruction? Could it be because he isn’t in fact all-powerful? In a way Voltaire is calling God’s power into question here which most Christians would not appreciate because that goes against nearly all Christian…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Blackburn Wrong

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He further argues God’s unwillingness to solve the issues at hand in the first place such as how the survival of some creatures are undeniably based upon the suffering of others; he goes as far as even giving…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious folk claim that God is all-benevolent. If this is the case, then why is evil permitted to exist? When faced with this question, believers state that evil exists to promote “the greater good”. The greater good is the idea that some pain and suffering must exist in the world for us as humans to access our second and third level “good” platforms. These levels consist of human qualities such as courageousness, charity and sacrifice. Believers claim that life would not be as good, or as whole, without knowing these feelings, however, I argue that if we never knew any of the “higher level” qualities, then we wouldn’t miss them. If, from the beginning, we only knew the first level good, and knew no pain and suffering, then we wouldn’t know any different. Could it not be a better life, a better world, with absolutely no pain, suffering or evil? So, the question remains, if God is wholly good then how does evil exist? It is possible that God is not completely good, it may be that He permits some evil to exist so we can reach our “greater goods.” On the opposing side of that theory, is it actually that there may not be a God and that evil is a product of our human nature, as well as the good in the world.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that suffering does help one become more human, that one cannot, or should not avoid suffering, and that by suffering we can form a bond and understanding of other people. In my opinion, there is not a single person that has not had to endure pain and suffering. It seems that some people go through more pain and suffering than others, but all go through some form or degree of it. Research suggest that, despite its unpleasantness, suffering may actually have positive social consequences, acting as a sort of “social glue” that fosters cohesion and solidarity within groups of people. Suffering is simply a part of life. I think that our own suffering helps us to empathize with others suffers, and because we have truly walked in the…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am always amazed at how quick non-believers are to say they is not God when something bad happens, yet do not praise God when good things happen. If he is responsible for the evil and suffering, who is responsible for the good. Through my experiences, my good outweight my bad. I may have had times when money was tight, relationships were horrible, and even experiencing abuse, but they are not numbered more than my greatness. I use my marriage as an example, after a few weeks my husband started abusing me. I left after only four months. My current relationship has been the first in my life to last more than six months without splitting up. I have been unemployed with two children, but never hungry or homeless. I grew up very poor and now…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theology of Suffering

    • 3273 Words
    • 14 Pages

    To suffer means to submit or be forced to endure (something unpleasant); to endure death, pain, or distress. It is known to happen to everyone, that it is a part of this world that we live in and essentially, there is no escaping it. Looking at it through a scientific lens, the second law of thermodynamics helps with the definition. That the whole world is in a slow downward spiral into death and that is inescapable. Just the thought of this for some people brings them to an emotional pain but the actual effect of it, death, causes a majority of the suffering that is experienced. Pain and suffering are not partial to a specific person or people group, it is the same across the board. People have different ways coping with the inevitability of it though. Some people choose superficial means or even tangible objects to cope while others turn to a more philosophical source and look at religion and the metaphysical to help understand or even find a reason for the suffering. When looking at religion, or lack thereof, it can be difficult to prescribe an overarching answer to suffering because most religions are very different, especially when it comes to this specific theology. Are they all right? No. One of the laws of truth, the law of noncontradiction, shows that two opposing subjects cannot both be deemed correct. So in this paper, a contrast will be made between these responses to the labyrinth of suffering that humanity is currently dwelling in.…

    • 3273 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Untenable Faith

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Taking into account the Holocaust and all of the other suffering that some groups of people have inflicted on others, an argument could easily be made to show that religious faith is untenable, or not defendable. How could all powerful and loving God let all of these bad things happen? This reminds me of Epicurus quote around 300 BC, "If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to then He is not omnipotent. If He is able, but not willing then He is malevolent. If He is both able and willing then whence cometh evil? If He is neither able nor willing then why call Him God?" (Mastin)…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of suffering probably is the hardest for me to bear as a Christian, because it is the result of evil in the world, and since God’s allowance of evil is hard to explain, it is an atheist’ best argument against Christian faith. My views on why God allows suffering are based on C.S. Lewis’ book “The Problem of Pain”. Lewis’ thoughts basically show that there is sufficient evidence that God is real and that pain exists because the all-powerful God created creatures that aren’t happy. Since the fall of man, we are never content with what we have and are always in on the pursuit of happiness that even our forefathers recognized. This explains evil in the world; that we feel like we deserve more than we have been given, so we fight for and take what we can get, often wickedly. Our general discontent leads to evil, which leads to…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays