Preview

Phl458 Famous Thinkers Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1543 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phl458 Famous Thinkers Research Paper
Famous Thinkers

PHL458
August 12, 2013
Charles Crenshaw

Famous Thinkers: Peter Singer and Bill Gates A thinker is an individual who reasons intellectually; this individual generally shares his views and theories with other thinkers and with society. The contributions made to humanity can be valuable and frequently encourage others to ponder the same issues. Other thinkers may become supporters or challengers to another. There have been many famous thinkers that have influenced society; I will be examining two men who have contributed to our culture, Peter Singer and Bill Gates. Peter Singer’s philosophies are controversial although he is considered an intellectual thinker. He contributed to society much of his time and his own money as an active founder of the modern animal rights movement and his work in bioethics (Duignan, 2013). Singer’s philosophy centers on utilitarianism. In his book Practical Ethics he claims his reasoning of utilitarianism captures the general nature
…show more content…
He also said there are other things we can do using creativity and knowledge to improve our world. There are many people in the world who live without their basic needs being met. People die from diseases that are easy to treat and prevent in developed countries such as ours. His thinking states “I believe that my own good fortune brings with it a responsibility to give back to the world” (Gates, 2005, p. 2). He founded the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a foundation that partners with organizations worldwide to challenge serious problems. The foundation works with the poor and poverty, harness advances in science and technology to save lives in countries that are still developing, and improve U.S. high schools and post-secondary education (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Singer, Peter (1946- ), Australian philosopher and bioethicist. Born in Melbourne, Australia, Singer studied at the University of Melbourne and at the University of Oxford, in England. He began his career lecturing ethics at Oxford from 1971 to 1973. He subsequently worked at various universities in North America and Australia. In 1977 he became a professor of philosophy at Monash University, in Melbourne. Singer also became closely associated with the university's Centre for Human Bioethics, which is dedicated to the study of the moral implications of biomedical discoveries. He served as its director from 1987 to 1991 and as its deputy director from 1992. In 1999 he became a professor at Princeton University's Center for Human Values.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The file PHL 458 Week 4 Individual Famous Thinkers Paper has solutions of the following task:…

    • 462 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The value of life is a notoriously difficult ethical question.” (1993, p. 62). However, like all utilitarians, Singer applies the 'greatest happiness principle' in order to begin addressing this dilemma. Utilitarian ethics dictates that we make decisions in such a way so as they result in the greatest net utility (or happiness) for the greatest number and this Singer regards as being the true only measure of good or ethical behaviour. Singer contends that there is no reason why such considerations considerations should not be extended to other animals. The term 'speciesism' was first popularised by Singer to label the prejudice of privileging humans and their interests over those of other animals. Singer's utilitarian viewpoint is grounded in what he commonly…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Care Ethics and Animal Welfare” is an article written by Daniel Engster from the Journal of Social Philosophy, published by Wiley Periodicals in 2016. Daniel Engster received his PhD from the University of Chicago and is a professor in the Political Science department at the University of Texas in San Antonio.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The foundation currently supports other non-profit organizations that work toward the foundations goals. If Bill Gates could turn the foundation around and actively work towards their goals by doing something themselves, they may achieve greater success as other organization seeking support can follow their lead.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, who later this month begins teaching at Princeton University, is perhaps the world's most controversial ethicist. Many readers of his book "Animal Liberation" were moved to embrace vegetarianism, while others recoiled at Singer's attempt to place humans and animals on an even moral plane. Similarly, his argument that severely disabled infants should, in some cases, receive euthanasia has been praised as courageous by some — and denounced by others, including anti-abortion activists, who have protested Singer's Princeton appointment.…

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I think of famous thinkers a vast number of people come to mind. Two thinkers that genuinely stand out to me are Bill Gates and Martin Luther King Jr. Bill Gates has virtually become a household name because of Microsoft. Martin Luther King Jr. is famous for his “I Have a Dream” speech. Bill Gates and Martin Luther King Jr. had numerous contributions to society and they worked through great lengths to make it happen.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    B. Singer then turns to the substantive issue of “what are the implications of utilitarianism for our treatment of animals?”…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer’s “Down on the Factory Farm” and E.B. White’s “Death of a Pig” illustrate practices of raising animals for human consumption. The care and environment provided for the animals by both White and the factory farmer’s that Singer discusses can be labelled as ‘animal husbandry’. White and the factory farm worker’s animal husbandry methods can be deemed as ethical, or unethical. Bernard E. Rollin defines good animal husbandry as “keeping the animals under conditions to which their natures [are] biologically adapted, and augmenting these natural abilities by providing additional food, protection, care, or shelter” (6). Through this definition of ethics and the criteria established by the “Principles” found in James P. Sterba’s “Reconciling Anthropocentric and Nonanthropocentric…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author argues inherent value. Regan points out animals should be able to experience life with inherent value of their own. Addressing commercial animal agriculture, the author declares "The fundamental moral wrong here is not that animals are kept in stressful close confinement or in isolation, or that their pain and suffering, their needs and preferences are ignored or discounted." Regan continues the only way to right the wrong would be to stop…

    • 684 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan's Position

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Argumentative essay that looks at and breaks down the philosophical difference between Tom Regan’s position on Animal rights and, Peter Singer’s position on Animal liberation as a basis for better treatment of animals.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Famous Thinkers

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Famous thinkers can come from all walks of life and can be from our generation and others. Reaching goals can be done in many ways. The similarity famous thinkers is that they are all share creative minds and are all creative thinkers. Creative ideas are the foundation of creative process (Goodman & Fritchie, 2011). Famous thinkers base their ideas on searching for solutions to problem, need, or the way others think or view specific issues. When I think of famous thinkers a vast number of people come to mind. Two thinkers that genuinely stand out to me are Steven Spielberg & Grace Hopper. My article will provide more details on the influence and accomplishments of these great thinkers.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Singer's Utilitarianism does give some sense of moral equality between humans and animals. He felt that animals have identical interests that are equally morally important as humans and that they must be treated with equal concern. Singer says: "Speciesism. . . the belief that we are entitled to treat members of other species in a way in which it would be wrong to treat members of our own…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Bill Gates, there are huge gap in the understanding of more energy and time between rich and poor countries. The meaning of more time and energy in rich country would only means more time to spend with family, more time to watch movies, and more energy to work extra hours. However, more time and energy have a whole different meaning for poor country. More energy for them means that the access to electricity more modern stuff like refrigerator, light bulb, and maybe computer. By having electricity, which is energy, accessible by these people would make a huge…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays