Physician Assisted Suicide Papers

Physician-assisted suicide grants the opportunity for a doctor to lethally inject drugs into a consented patient. This controversial topic has sparked a huge moral issue. The feud between whether it is morally acceptable ultimately pays no key role. People have been committing suicide in gruesome ways for hundreds of years and will continue to do so. If their only ambition is to die, why not let them do it peacefully? Even though this subject is seen as morally unacceptable, physician-assisted suicide should only be legal in certain circumstances, including the following: when a patient is terminally ill, with validation from their doctor, inmates in prison sentenced for life, and patients in an irreversible coma. Unfortunately, completely legalizing physician-assisted suicide across the globe could lead to an outbreak of patients taking advantage or abusing this privilege. After figuring out a temporary problem that may cause short-term depression, it could easily shift a person’s mind into thinking about suicide if the option is always available. Limiting this opportunity to victims with an everlasting problem could
The death penalty played a dominant role for a long time executing prisoners who violently disobeyed the law. Since the banning of the death penalty, the overcrowding of our prisons has been at an all-time high. Wasting your existence in prison, especially at a young age, is not an ideal lifestyle. Numerous inmates have requested a lethal injection rather than growing old behind bars. In Sarah Blake’s newspaper article, “Inside Story on How Martin Bryant Lives — and Will Die,” she introduces Martin Bryant as a man who brutally killed 35 innocent people and was sentenced for 1035 years of prison. Sarah also told us that Martin Bryant shortly began attempting to commit suicide after understanding his sentence. He said, “Imprisonment for life, with no hope of parole, is torture”