Assistant Professor J. Masiweimai
EN120a
Argumentative Essay Loosing a love one is the most painful thing anybody can go through. However, watching them suffer is the most painful. I have not yet experienced it; however, when the time comes I will have to be strong for my family. Everyday people die it’s a part of life whether it is more than one person it is still death. However, if I were given a choice to help a person to die or not I would have chosen to help them die. I might sound a bit harsh or cruel but I’m not saying that I am trying to murder someone because that is for a fact that I am not. Furthermore, I am merely trying to find a solution to end their misery on this Earth. However, if I were to help someone die I would use the practice called Euthanasia which is from a Greek word meaning “Good death” refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia). Therefore, I agree that physician should be allowed to assist people who want to die. In addition, my reason would be because of financial problems, suffering of family members and victim, and off course the victim is already dead. I might sound a bit evil in a way but I am just stating my opinion. As we all know we live in a world that sings money, money, and money. Nothing is free we have to work to earn money to survive and live. Nowadays, no one really goes gardening that much, no one really goes fishing or catching craps and they are ones that are practically free. Most people will just go to the store to get what they need such as, can meats, rice, soda, and others. Therefore, my point is nothing is free if we want something we work for it or sometimes if we can’t offered it we steal it and that’s not good. In addition, we have a financial problem which is one of my reasons that I would agree that physicians should assist people who want to die. For example, if one of your love ones is in a comma and has been in the hospital for three years that the only thing keeping him or her alive are cords, wires, oxygen tube and a machine but still hasn’t come out of it what would you do? Can you still keep on paying his or her medical bill? Can you watch that person sleep while you leave everything behind just to take care of him or her? Even if you have that much love for that person that you’re willing to stay beside him or her no matter what it won’t change anything and it won’t bring that person back. You would be just paying for everything that needs to be paid and taking care of everything that needs to be taking care of and would be left with nothing but yourself. Secondly, Suffer is a major problem that we have to go through also. That is why it is one of my second reasons. We are already suffering just by working as hard as we can just to survive. Therefore, for us to end up with an unexpected situation that involves one of our family members being in a comma and can’t get out of it would be heart broken. Not just for the family members but for the victim also. For example, if I were to the one who has end up in a comma and has to be taken care of for the rest of my life I would not want my family members to be in pain just because of my unexpected disease. I would want them to move on with their lives and be grateful that they get to see the next sunrise. In addition, if a physician does not have the guts to help me end my life I would be the one to do it myself because making my family suffer is the last thing I would want my family to go through. They have already taken care of me since I was baby such as, feeding me, protecting me, loving me, and taking care of my financial needs. Therefore, I would not want them to repeat the same cycle all over again. Lastly, if you have been in a comma for three years that the only thing keeping you alive is an oxygen tank that’s controlling your breathing, machine that’s making your heart pump blood through your blood streams, and an IV that feeding you everyday so you won’t go hungry. By not doing anything at all such as, moving, breathing, feeling, and eating you are considered dead. I was told by my father “That if you cannot do anything in your life you can might as well kill yourself to end your suffer”. Therefore, to hear my father say that to me I was encouraged, instead, of discourage and rebel like any most teenagers will do. That is why I would prefer to help that person die in a way that will end his or her pain and suffering. However, there are many people that would say that physician should not be allowed to assist people that want to die. Therefore, in most case a person that does not have the strength to go through with it would be against it. I can think of other reason why they would not agree and they are because it will cause animosity for the family. For example, family members that do not want their love ones to die but had to endure the pain of loosing him or her anyway would cause separation between family members and animosity. Secondly, loosing a love one would be painful to bear. As a result, they will be heart broken and empty throughout their lives unless they seek out closer and thirdly physician does not have the right to end someone’s life which is true. However, it may seem that way even if you do not want that person to die it wont change the fact that he or she is going to die. In conclusion, I know that loosing a love one is the most painful thing anybody can go through. However, seeing a love one suffering for a very long time is the most painful. I might not yet experience it but to my own observation that I have see from others I know that they would not want to loose a love one in vain. Therefore, I agree that physicians should be allowed to assist people who wan to die. In addition, my reasons would be because of financial problems, suffering of family members and victim, and off course the victim is already dead.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Instead of embracing this act of death, we should respond to suffering with compassion and solidarity. (Anderson, Screen 1) Many of the patients seeking to end their lives in this way usually suffer from depression or other mental illnesses, but also from loneliness. Instead of us giving them pills to kill them, the doctors should provide the suitable medical care they need. As for the patients in physical pain, pain management drugs can be administered to improve their quality of life. The terminally ill patients are provided with hospice care and fellowship to accompany them on their last days of life. Doctors should help their patients die a dignified death of natural causes, not assist in killing them. (Anderson, Screen 1) Physicians take the oath to always heal and care, never to kill intentionally. Palliative care focuses on the patient’s quality of life and improving it by alleviating pain and other distressing symptoms of a serious illness. At any age or stage in illness, palliative care is available to help improve the patient’s life as a whole. It does not matter if the illness is curable, chronic, or even life-threatening, medicine can improve your symptoms dramatically, helping you live with your…
- 1073 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Physicians and patients debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide is okay to do in any circumstances, because there are pros and cons to every side. One might say that if a physician assists in the suicide it may help someone not suffer through a slow painful death. Another person might argue that if a physician does assist even by just prescribing the medicine is morally wrong and against the oath the physician takes at the beginning of his or her career. Understanding some people are terminally ill and want to just die versus putting up the fight is a hard situation to understand, but some physicians do “understand”. Even though they understand does not mean that they will agree to assist in taking the pain away from someone. On the other hand a patient may want to live as long as possible and prosper every bit of their life even if it means being in a vegetative state.…
- 1256 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…
- 2132 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…
- 616 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A patient should have the liberty of choosing to end their suffering. Although, it may see has an extreme option, is an option the patient should have the right. However, some doctor think that Physician-Assisted Suicide goes against the oath they made. According to the article” Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List”, one of the con of this practice is “Violates the Hippocratic Oath”. Which was that every life is sacred, therefore, commanding respect. So, just because the patients give permission, doesn’t make killing right. Still, by respecting the patient’s wishes and taking him/her out of his/her misery, the doctor is respecting their life. Physician-Assisted Suicide helps the patients in many different ways like being prepare or ending their suffering. Physician-assisted Suicide helps them retain their dignity. Terminally ill, coma, or mentally competent patients are suffering every day. For some, the pain is so much, that they don’t consider themselves “living”. Physician-assisted suicide help patients properly said goodbye to their love ones at their own pace and at their own comfort. It gives them the opportunity to be surrounded by the people they love and the things they love. An article called “Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List” by Nyln.org, it stated that “Physician-Assisted Suicide makes grief easier to handle” (Nyln). Since, everyone its inform of the patient’s…
- 904 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Physician assisted dying is a very controversial issue and it is only becoming more controversial with more cases coming to light. Many people believe that assisting a patient in dying goes against the moral code that doctors should follow. Their job is to go to any measures to sustain the life under their care, but what about individuals suffering with no hope of getting better? Wouldn’t doctors then be obligated morally to relieve these individuals of their agony and put them to peace? Considering that, some argue in favor of the sick and believe they deserve a voice and a right to choose how much suffering is enough suffering. Should someone who is suffering from a terminal illness that…
- 1035 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…
- 2102 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Bioethics is considered by some to be the decisions made by a person or group using logic and knowledge of right or wrong as it affects current biological issues. It is a growing concern in today’s world where people are caught in a balancing act of human nature and law to determine right and wrong regarding biological and medical issues concerning them. A bioethical issue that has been around for years is physician aid in death. Although this issue is said to give terminally ill patients the comfort and dignity of ending their lives on the terms they choose, some say that decisions are influenced by doctors and infringe upon human rights.…
- 1448 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Terminally ill patients, like Brittany Maynard, that sit in hospitals for the rest of their days generally feel their liabilities hovering over them. The main issue these patients have is watching their family have to pay all the hospital bills. Patients usually feel guilty about this because they know that when they die, their family will go into financial debt. According to an article that is for the legalization of assisted suicide, “The cost of maintaining a dying person has been estimated as ranging from about two to ten thousand dollars a month" (Torre 1). If the patient were to die naturally it would be painful for the patient, and it would leave the family in financial ruin. We, as citizens, must also consider that in the final stages of a patient’s life, the medicine does not take away the pain as much as it used to because the body has adapted to the frequent use of it. Assisted suicide would be a good option for a scenario like this because they would die in a calm area without any burdens. Not only would it fix the financial problems within a family, but often times when a patient…
- 1344 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Many of us have felt the pain of watching a loved one’s life slowly diminish in a hospital bed. Today, modern medicine and doctors can only go so far to care for terminally ill patients. Even with the knowledge of this country’s best medicine and most extraordinary doctors, many of the terminally ill suffer persistently; they become unhappy, and some are not able to fend for themselves in ways healthy individuals find to be easy and are able to do. The simple every day actions begin to be tremendous struggles such as eating, moving, and even communicating. In extreme cases, terminally ill patients may no longer find the will or strength to move forward. Physician-assisted death can be constructed to have reasonable laws, which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life, easing the patients suffering when nearing the end of their life. Physician-assisted death is ethical and is a compassionate response to unbearable suffering. Physicians should be required by law to help terminally ill patients, with no hope, which have a strong desire to end their lives.…
- 2942 Words
- 12 Pages
Better Essays -
End of life medical issues are a very sensitive subject for doctors, patients, and family members. Some support the patients’ right to terminate their own life. Euthanasia loosely called physician assisted suicide is when one takes deliberate action to end life when faced with persistent suffering and certain death (Medical News Today, 2012).Many feel that patients should not have to suffer unjustly when faced with serious pain and debilitating illness. Often times it is just as difficult for family members to stand by and watch loved ones suffer. As someone that has witnessed both my grandmothers die on hospice care in the last six months, I know that watching someone die can be more painful than losing them all together. With as much compassion as I have for people in pain, I do not believe people have the right to end their lives whenever they chose. I oppose euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) because I believe that it is a doctor’s duty to keep patients alive, it may create financial and ethical issues when it comes to patients and insurance companies, and God should be the only one who decides when ones journey has been completed.…
- 844 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Most individuals, especially those fond of medical dramas, know of the Hippocratic Oath and its primary obligation of doing no harm; however, the vow physicians take before graduating medical school is being challenged by physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS. Individuals diagnosed with a terminal illness that causes pain and suffering towards the end of life will pick a date to painlessly die before their disease progresses too far. As this practice becomes more widespread, arguments over the ethics of medical doctors aiding in the suicide of their ill patients have erupted. Some argue that in doing so, doctors violate the Hippocratic Oath while stripping the patient of their personal autonomy. Those who support the decision to commit…
- 1418 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
As a society we associate doctors and health care professionals with the idea of healing; and having physicians be able to assist in the suicide of a patient might alter people’s opinion on doctors as a whole. In Jon Fullers article, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: An unnecessary Crisis”, he states, “granting [this] power to physicians would sully subconscious image[s] of the healer” (Fuller 10). Fuller believes that allowing physicians to take part in ending someones life, would change how health care professions are viewed. Fuller also writes that participating in the,“ taking of life crosses a threshold and threatens the trust in beneficence that is the root of the physician-patient relationship”(12). It takes a strong relationship between doctor and patient to come to the consensus that there are no other options for that patient. There has to be a great deal of trust for a patient to believe the physicians profession opinion on their course of treatment is accurate. For the patient having the their doctor help them end their life is an act of beneficence. The laws for physician assisted suicide are clear on the fact that the patient must be terminal with less than six months to live. Many people choose physician assisted suicide because they don’t want those last six months to be full of suffering and the worse months of their life. To the patients…
- 1633 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…
- 1126 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays