Contemporary slaves. They sleep, eat, and work in a fast-food restaurant, without a salary nor the opportunity to flee. They all have the same clothes, the same hair, and the same faces because they happen to be clones. Although it is fictitious, this horrendous story featured in a science-fiction novel called Cloud Atlas shocks its readers and yet asks a question. Should scientist be allowed to clone laboratory animals and, moreover, humans? As for now, the operation in which an entire replica of an animal is produced, called "reproductive cloning", is unable to clone humans. However, reproductive cloning should be banned everywhere in the world, since it is a threat to the environment, to human dignity, …show more content…
Mourning individuals could overcome their sorrow by replicating their loved one. However, although this assertion is widely used in debates surrounding the cloning case, it might not be as simple as it seems. First, as BioCentre points out, clones do not behave the same way as their original version, nor do they have the same temperament. Indeed, they are exposed to other settings and circumstances which shape a different personality. Therefore, scientist would never be able to create a literal reproduction of the deceased individual. Second, also according to Biocentre, cloning in order to provide replacement might lead to harmful psychological consequences on a cloned child. In fact, many people worry that parents would not acknowledge his proper identity, while they would continuously compare him to their first child. Thus, being constantly pressured might generate anxiety and strain in the clone's mind. For these two reasons, especially because of sentimental reasons, cloning should be banned, since it causes prejudice to human