Ferster presented his position by accurately explaining his thoughts on the experiment and how his experience with Skinner went. He stated his personal position through the article and he supported his statements accurately. Additionally, the findings were supported through Ferster’s own experiences by examples of the time spent at Harvard working on the experiments. Specifically, Ferster explained how he formulated a hypothesis and built equipment in order for the testing of the experiment to be successful. The purpose of this article was significant in explaining the dedication, time, effort, and collaboration that took place in order for the pigeon laboratory experiments to be …show more content…
More discoveries were found and there were more accomplishments made due to not being concerned about the outcome. The individuals knew that all of the time and effort would pay off in the end. Specifically, the individuals valued the results and did not necessarily get upset when there was a minor problem. There is always a fear of the unknown, but Skinner and Ferster made the most of the uncertainty and it always resulted positively. Additionally, it is substantial that the pigeon laboratory was a place where individuals could rely on new discoveries and accomplishments to occur due to the