Preview

Pigeon Laboratory Experience With B F Skinner Summary

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1252 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pigeon Laboratory Experience With B F Skinner Summary
The purpose of this article was to describe C. B. Ferster’s pigeon laboratory experience with B. F. Skinner at Harvard in the 1950s. Ferster focused this article on his experience within the laboratory as well as the significant support that was offered by Skinner throughout the entire process of conducting experiments. A successful experiment was explained, which led to conversation about data, differentiating devices, new experiments, and original ways to improve the experience within the laboratory. This article also included communication between Ferster and Skinner that was based on the comparison of schedules. Eventually, the individuals had such a widespread repertoire that they made similar decisions on the process and could agree on …show more content…
Ferster presented his position by accurately explaining his thoughts on the experiment and how his experience with Skinner went. He stated his personal position through the article and he supported his statements accurately. Additionally, the findings were supported through Ferster’s own experiences by examples of the time spent at Harvard working on the experiments. Specifically, Ferster explained how he formulated a hypothesis and built equipment in order for the testing of the experiment to be successful. The purpose of this article was significant in explaining the dedication, time, effort, and collaboration that took place in order for the pigeon laboratory experiments to be …show more content…
More discoveries were found and there were more accomplishments made due to not being concerned about the outcome. The individuals knew that all of the time and effort would pay off in the end. Specifically, the individuals valued the results and did not necessarily get upset when there was a minor problem. There is always a fear of the unknown, but Skinner and Ferster made the most of the uncertainty and it always resulted positively. Additionally, it is substantial that the pigeon laboratory was a place where individuals could rely on new discoveries and accomplishments to occur due to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Professor Jerome Kagen Smokes, a man who worked with Skinner, suggested that no one can make anyone do something they do not want to do (17). Some argue whether or not Skinner placed his daughter, Deborah Skinner, into a box and raised her inside of this box as an experiment. In order to verify this, Slater searches and searches for Skinner’s daughter. She did not find his daughter, but she did find his other daughter who wanted to advocate for her father, Julie. She tells Slater how much both girls loved their father, how he did nothing but support them, did not believe in punishment, and cared a lot about science and people. She loved him so much she even preserved the very last piece of chocolate he ate. Many suggest he was a man of cruelty and loved science more than his own family, but his own family suggests he was kind, loving, and cared about people. Slater tried to find out more about Skinner, and within this chapter, I believe he was misunderstood and complicated. I do not believe we should hurt animals, but sometimes science comes at a cost. We will never know if he truly put his daughter in a box, but science has come a long way in psychology because of his discoveries and we cannot deny he changed history…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus I verified and established each step of my course in its turn before advancing to the next. These experiments were made painstakingly in the London Zoological Gardens, and covered many months of painstaking and fatiguing work.” (Twain, The Damned Human Race) The experiments were mind blowing and cruel. Twain stated, “In truth, man is incurably foolish. Simple things which the other animals easily learn, he is incapable of learning. Among my experiments was this. In an hour I taught a cat and a dog to be friends. I put them in a cage. In another hour I taught them to be friends with a rabbit. In the course of two days I was able to add a fox, a goose, a squirrel and some doves. Finally a monkey. They lived together in peace; even affectionately. Next, in another cage I confined an Irish Catholic from Tipperary, and as soon as he seemed tame I added a Scotch Presbyterian from Aberdeen. Next a Turk from Constantinople; a Greek Christian from Crete; an Armenian; a Methodist from the wilds of Arkansas; a Buddhist from China; a Brahman from Benares. Finally, a Salvation Army Colonel from Wapping. Then I stayed away two whole days. When I came back to note results, the cage…

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silence was published in 1966 by a Japanese Catholic author, Shusaku Endo. The setting takes place in the 17th Century, in Japan. Priest are banned and the government becomes more strict on Christianity, which then pushes people into hiding. Father Ferreira’s two former students, in Rome, are in denial to believe that the missionary could betray his faith. This is where we get introduced to two former European Catholic Priest, Father Rodrigues and Father Garrpe, they want to travel to Japan to see it all for themselves to try and make sense of it.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say I Say Ch5, 1

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gershoff’s theory of animal testing being beneficial is extremely useful because it sheds light on the difficult problem of animal testing.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harlow’s experiments are wrong because their outcomes do not justify the death and inhumane treatment of the monkeys. Lauren Slater states in her book Opening Skinner’s Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century, “I, for one, am unsure whether [Harlow’s experiment] provides us with new knowledge, or simply confirms what we all intuitively knew, at the expense of many monkeys’ lives” (147). Basically, Slater is saying that the outcome of Harlow’s killing and torturing of monkeys was not new knowledge, but only confirmation of what we already knew. Experiments are justified in sacrificing monkeys if the outcome of the experiment is the discovery of new knowledge. By contrast, experiments are not justified in sacrificing monkeys…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: N.A. (2011). Animal Experimentation: Guide To Critical Analysis. Points Of View: Animal Experimentation: 4. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bird Lab

    • 432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this inquiry lab, we explored natural selection using a laboratory. We wanted to see…

    • 432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you want a bird who can talk, a Quaker parrot is the one you're looking for because parrot Quaker training is easy. It is a fast-learner, develops a bond with the owner and loves to be around people. Results would be better if just one member of the family would teach a parrot how to talk. Even so, you can hear the bird imitating the other members of the family as well.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kyle

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Before particularizing any of the experiments, I wish to state one or two things, which seem to more properly belong in this place than further along. This, in the interest of…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Knight describes how the cruel treatment of test subjects is not only inhumane but can lead to inconclusive tests, meaning these animals are abused and killed with nothing to show for it. He describes gastric gavaging, which is when a tube is forcibly inserted into the esophagus to administer test compounds. Tactics like this, along with stressors like limited space, no interaction with other animals, and mental torture lead to unnatural test results. In Knight’s words, “these stressors can alter physiological, hormonal, and immune statuses and even cognitive capacities and behavioral repertoires, in ways that are not always predictable.” More stressors come into play when test subjects are pulled from the wild.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    `”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of experimenting on animals has always been controversial. In pursuit of scientific knowledge, animal testing is essential, but as the word testing implies, such experiments are often harmful or ineffective. Over the decades scientists have had to choose whether to put morals over advancements, ultimately determining the fate of countless animals.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay About Animal Testing

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moreover, sometimes in experiments in which animals are tested upon, there is not a world-changing discovery that changes the medical field and save thousands of people’s lives. Nevertheless, those experiments do not go to waste. In fact, a lot of information can be taken from the experiments whether a cure is found or not.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people argue that animal testing is morally correct because it is necessary in order for science to evolve and to protect human health. Psychologist like Ivan Pavlov and Harry Harlow used animal testing and discovered critical knowledge of development and the human brain. Without these animal experimentations, a lot would still be unanswered about the way the human brain functions. The Institute for Laboratory Animal Research of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences thinks virtually every medical achievement in the 20th century has had to use animal testing in some form. This is because even with all the highly sophisticated technology, nothing can model the exact interactions between molecules, cells, tissues, organs, and organisms, which makes animal testing a necessity in many cases. Suppporters of animal testing say that these advances are critical, and that without animal test subjects the advances would not occur, would require human testing, or would result in untested products being offered to the public without being fully researched.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animals are usually confined to small cages and being exposed to harmful fumes for human benefit.In their “Animal” Journal, Elisabeth H. Ormandy and Catherine Schuppli claim that "the use of animals in research fosters a diverse range of attitudes, with some people expressing the desire for complete abolition of animal research practices, while others express strong support (392)." Animal testing has stirred up an argument between two opposing sides regarding the ethics of the practice. The two opposing sides are those who disagree with animal testing and those who agree with animal testing. Nuno Henrique Franco author of "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective" state that "Animal experimentation has played a central role in biomedical research throughout history. For centuries, however, it has also been an issue of heated public and philosophical discussion."(238) Those who are in favor of animal testing believe that it is beneficial to improving medicine. Those who are against animal testing believe that it is harmful to animals and that their are other ways to benefit humans. Being an animal lover, I oppose of animal testing for several different reasons. The first reason being animals are being subjected to all forms of suffering and isolation. The second reason is animals are not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays