Plagiarism Lines Blur For Students In The Digital Age

To plagiarize means to steal and pass off as one’s own the ideas or words of another. Today’s society revolves heavily around technology and the internet, which creates a generation that has different ideals and standards about plagiarism. The simple act of cutting and pasting as described by author William Gibson in "God's Little Toys: Confessions of a cut and paste artist" is no longer simple; it is complex. Instead of viewing it as wrong, which is done in Trip Gabriel’s article, “Plagiarism Lines Blur for students in the digital age”, it should be seen as a new form of creation and expression. The digital age’s expansion requires new standards and interpretations of plagiarism because of the growing use of mixing and matching of ideas.
He explains how students growing up in the internet age show a lack of understanding that information found on the internet does not belong to them. Gabriel speaks of multiple cases of students that believed information and texts found on the internet did not need to be cited because it was assumed to be common knowledge. These days, students fail to see that lifting texts or words from the internet and pasting it into their own work is a serious offense. This generation believes that information found on the web is fair game for anyone to take because of how easily accessible it is. Ms. Bookover, an undergraduate Trip Gabriel interviewed about the cheating going on in college life, describes how walking into a library and actually holding the article is different than viewing it online. Being in the same place one downloads music and video gives the researcher the sense that everything can belong to you. She discusses how students feel it is O.K. to uses someone else’s words as long as you don’t care and do it purely for a grade. She emphasizes that if the educational system loosens plagiarism standards, creativity will decline and laziness will grow. Bookover believes one major factor for the growth of plagiarism is the lack of preparation and education given in high
Gabriel emphasizes shared texts as being a problem and labels it as plagiarism, whereas Gibson explains how it is a new form of creating work in an ever changing age of the internet. Gabriel describes a one dimensional evaluation of the topic and Gibson a multi-faceted assessment. Instead of viewing “mixing and matching” as a crime that “does not foster creativity”, it should be seen as more of a way to bring together great ideas that have already been written and creating new works of art (Gabriel). Just like DJ’s around the world who are “deconstructing recorded music” to create their own “versions”, writers who use the idea’s of others create their own (Gibson). Applying the same methods, writers use an endless “recombinant” process that actively uses ideas from past work as a jumping off point and expand upon them (Gibson). This characteristic of today’s digital media age should not be frowned on by the academic community, but rather viewed with an open mind. The availability of information on the internet is a useful tool that was meant to be taken advantage of. Students feel confined when they fear the possibility of accidentally using an idea that was not originally theirs, and as a result, stifled