Preview

Plato's Two-World Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's Two-World Theory
How Plato Used His Two-Worlds Theory As an Argument Against the Three Predominant Pre-Socratic Theories on Reality One of the ongoing quests in human history is the search for what is reality composed of and what can one use to determine what is real and what is merely an illusion or perhaps part of a false reality. This search can be traced back as far as some of the pre-Socratic philosophers. The three more popular theories that were around came from three pre-Socratic philosophers, Heraclitus, Protagoras, and Parmenides. All three philosophers had a theory of what reality is composed of and what the ultimate reality is. Plato came along and more or less combined the three theories into one larger theory that is now called Plato’s Two-Worlds Theory. Plato’s Two-Worlds Theory is a relatively simple theory. Plato suggests that there are two worlds, or realms. The first world is perfect and is referred to as the World of Being. The second world is the imperfect world, called the World of Becoming. The two realms are separate from each other; however, there is a connection that exists between the two worlds. The only way that the World of Becoming can be connected to the World of Being is through participation. The World of Becoming is inhabited by all tangible objects. The World of Being contains something that Plato refers to as Forms. Forms are essentially ideas, but there are four requirements that must be met in order to classify something as a Form. A Form must be eternal, perfect, transcendent, and objective. This means that an object cannot be in the World of Being, but an object being that object, such as a Douglas fir being a tree. The tree cannot be in the World of Being, but treeness is; therefore, the Douglas fir is participating in the World of Being which is the one connection between the two worlds described in Plato’s theory. This theory was used as a rebuttal against other theories of Heraclitus, Protagoras, and Parmenides.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain the Relationship Between Plato’s Form of the Good and the Other Forms.
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain the Relationship Between Plato’s Form of the Good and the Other Forms.

    The theory of the Forms suggests that there are two worlds in which we live, one is through reality (world of Forms), whilst the other is accessed through our minds (world of Particulars). He highlights that there is only one of each Form while there are many copies of that Form, however, they all share common factors to the Form allowing them to be recognised and compared to. Plato describes the Forms to be perfect, eternal and un-changing whereas the Particulars are imperfect, finite and changing. This can be related to Plato’s conflicting ideas about education in his era, as he believes that the world of Particulars is based on opinion rather than knowledge and so does not approve of this world- the theory of the Forms and the Form of the Good allowed him to express these views showing how the Forms portray the creation of a better, conceptual world. Additionally, Plato describes the Forms to be intelligible, rational and non-corporal which means that his world of Forms cannot be accessed physically and so disproved. This therefore shows the Particulars to be material and corruptible which became a strong ground for us to relate to his theory as the imperfection and continuously changing world…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    By the 1850's the Constitution became a source of sectional discord, ultimately contributing to the failure of the union. This tries to disprove this statement. *AP US DBQ from 1987
    • 1469 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By the 1850's the Constitution became a source of sectional discord, ultimately contributing to the failure of the union. This tries to disprove this statement. *AP US DBQ from 1987

    In the mid-1800's, many events occurred that increased sectional tension between the Northern and Southern states of the Union. These tensions ultimately resulted in the outbreak of civil war. One thing in particular that is considered to be a source of sectional discord is the U.S. Constitution. However the Constitution itself was not a source of sectional tension that caused the failure of the Union. The failure erupted generally from the issue of slavery. combination of the people in general and the differences in economic styles that lead to the downfall. Poor political decisions such as the Kansas Nebraska Act, lead to bad decisions which worsened the tensions of the union. The economic differences ultimately lead to the Civil War because it was the driving force that caused the differences between the North and The South.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    B)to What Extent Is It True to Say That the Forms Teach Us Nothing About the Physical World?
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    B)to What Extent Is It True to Say That the Forms Teach Us Nothing About the Physical World?

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato
    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle vs Plato

    Plato felt that there are two different levels of reality compared to Aristotle who felt that there was only one level of reality. Plato’s way of thinking always came from ideas from within that were applied to the outside world as opposed to Aristotle whose ideas came from the outside world and then were applied within. These contrast ideas were a result in Aristotle believing that there is one level of reality. He believed that there was only one world, and that forms existed in particular things. Aristotle felt that everything was matter, and certain kinds of matter were composed into different things. He believed that form did not have a separate existence, but existed in matter. Plato, however, believed that there were two levels of reality. Physical and mental were two different things in his eyes. Physical is what is real and you can see and/or touch, and mental is what seems to be real but cannot be seen such as air. Plato believed that there are “two worlds” and that everything real has a form but does not symbolize that form.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain the Platonic Concept of Forms
    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the Platonic Concept of Forms

    Plato believed that reality is more than what we sense around the world (e.g. taste, smell, hear, see and touch), he believed that behind these physical realities lies a perfect version of them in which he called Forms and that the greatest thing we can learn is to have knowledge and understanding of them. Plato’s theory means that what we can sense around us (for example a chair) is just a mere shadow of the perfect version which exists in the world of Forms. The perfect version of a chair is one in which for fills its purpose e.g. to be comfortable and to be sat on. Plato believed that everything had a perfect Form, from objects such as pens and books to things such as beauty and justice. He believed that to experience the world of Forms we had to become perfect philosophers.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    As mentioned before, Aristotle has different theories than Plato. He suggests that the forms can be discovered through a examination of the world being natural. Now, Plato believes that forms are farther than what humans can understand, it is way beyond.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Is It True To Say That The Forms Teach Us Nothing About The Physical World
    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To What Extent Is It True To Say That The Forms Teach Us Nothing About The Physical World

    There is an ongoing debate as to whether Plato’s Theory of Forms truly teaches us anything about the physical or empirical world, with many scientists and philosophers throughout history having very contrasting views. Throughout this essay I will lay down both arguments for and against the above statement and evaluate the outcome.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hearsay Evidence In A Criminal Trial
    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hearsay Evidence In A Criminal Trial

    The first quotation is hearsay evidence. I think this because the person giving the testimony overheard the conversation between Micheal and the victim. Furthermore, in the textbook it states" hearsay evidence is evidence of someone other than a witness who said or wrote something out of court that may be relevant to the fact of the case. It is usually related to a private conversation that [has] been overheard by a uninvolved person." The person giving the testimony is someone other than a witness. This means that the person saw nothing, but heard everything.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Imperfection Argument Analysis
    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Plato's Imperfection Argument Analysis

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phaedo: Separation Of The Soul From The Body
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phaedo: Separation Of The Soul From The Body

    Parmenides and Zeno both influenced Plato in his theory of the Forms, which was intended to satisfy the Parmenidian requirement of metaphysical unity and stability in knowable reality. Zeno's paradoxes aim to prove that Being is single, finite, motionless, and unchanging by examining the absurdities of the opposite "common-sense" hypothesis that several things exist. For example, (pg. 69) the distinction between the visible and the invisible. The body is visible and deceived by the senses, whereas, the soul is invisible and searches for understanding and knowledge on its own. The soul is divine and rules whereas the body is mortal and is ruled. Thus, the conclusion is that the body is human, mortal, multiform, unintelligible, soluble, and never consistently the same, whereas, the soul is divine, deathless, intelligible, uniform, indissoluble, and always the same as itself. The Forms must be incomposite since they are constant and invariable and particular objects in the world are variable and composite. Thus, the Forms are invisible and can only be apprehended by the mind, whereas, the material things can be sensed by the…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Forms teach us nothing about the physical world
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Forms teach us nothing about the physical world

    Furthermore, contained within the Realm of the Forms is the perfect version or copy of everything in the world, and everything in the world is just a copy of the perfect version in the Realm of the Forms, hence the Realm cannot teach us about any physical objects in the world if the object in the Realm is different to all the others on Earth. For example, in the Realm of the Forms will be the perfect version of a chair so, according to Plato, all the chairs in the physical world are copies of the perfect version so the perfect chair cannot teach us anything about a physical chair in the world that we know.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    oman
    • 1403 Words
    • 5 Pages

    oman

    Plato: believed there were two coexisting worlds which included an ideal, real world and am…

    • 1403 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Tripartite Soul
    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Platos Tripartite Soul

    Plato’s espousal of a tripartite conception of the ‘soul’ as displayed in The Republic, offers an interesting and valuable account of the human psyche, and for the motivational factors that can influence individual conduct. By virtue of searching for why a man should follow courses of action that are seen to be ‘just’, Plato compliments his ethical answers by establishing a psychological structure that shows that conflict predominantly occurs during our decision making as moral agents. We can also see in The Republic a progression of the soul from his earlier, more primitive account, that saw that man could only act in his best interests (even if these were subsequently flawed). Plato has developed his arguments considerably so as to take into account that there may be lower order appetites and desires that can obfuscate and subvert reason, and that this is the reason why people may error with unjust actions.…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Ideal Society
    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato's Ideal Society

    plato's utopia had several features, but he basically tried to make a perfectly just society. in the republic, he examines a few concepts of justice, including justice being telling the truth and repaying your debts, doing good to friends and harm to enemies, and justice being what is in the interest of the stronger. he rejects all these ideas eventually and says that justice is based on a society's natural division of labor. for example, workers perform optimally when they are specialized- a construction worker can't possibly have expertise in medicine, likewise a doctor cant possibly have expertise in trade. also, each person is naturally suited for a certain task. for example, if you're really smart, you're better off being a lawyer than a landscaper (of course, these aren't the examples he gives, i'm just trying to simplify). so, to plato, each person has their own area of expertise that they must focus on. this is a prerequisite for justice, and justice results when everybody does only their designated role and doesn't interfere with the designated roles of others. the way in which he hopes to establish this is through education.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics