Preview

Plato and Socrates Relentless Question

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato and Socrates Relentless Question
Socrates knew the trial brought onto him by three citizens of Athens was not just and the official accusations of corrupting the youth and impiety are not the true reasons for the trial. He was put to death because of his method of challenging others in the search for wisdom and knowledge. Socrates was given the opportunity to defend himself and choose not to beg for his life but praise his life and to honor his mission. He opposed the charges by a cross-examination of the people who put him on trial to show they had not put enough thought into their claims. Socrates' downfall, was that he made his defense in the same method he spent his life work by making many wealthy and powerful people reveal their own ignorance and lack of knowledge. The love of life, however did not outweigh Socrates' love of principle and honor.

It was Socrates' mission to spend his days seeking wisdom. His method to gain wisdom was asking a series of questions of his fellow Athenians. This process would be repeated until an acceptable agreement would be reached or it was determined not to be profitable to go further with the discussion. This tactic, in many cases, pointed out ignorance and irritated the people of Athens. During his defense, Socrates denounced his accusers of not telling the truth and states that many times "he will tell the truth." Socrates soundly defends the charge that he is the only person who is responsible for corrupting the youth in Athens. Through a process of questions with one of his accusers, Socrates concludes "then every Athenian improves and elevates them; all with the exception of myself; and I alone am their corrupter?" (Apology, 4) Metetus the accuser agrees with this statement. By Metetus agreeing that only Socrates has corrupted the youth provides evidence that this claim has little merit. I believe that it is ludicrous to claim that only Socrates corrupts the youth of a city. No one person can have that much influence on people. As

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Socrates Guilty

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Is Socrates actually guilty of either of the crimes with which he is charged: impiety and corrupting the youth? Are these crimes dangerous for a political community? Is Socrates, in his Apology, fully persuasive that he and his way of life pose no threat to the city? (To answer these questions, you will need to ask yourself what is the foundation for Athenian or, indeed, any political society.)…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates believed that his purpose, as a moral individual, was to achieve true wisdom of virtue and justice. With this considered, one may ask, "Then why did he accept punishment for crimes he didn't commit?" Socrates didn't care for fate, because he was only concerned for whether or not he and others were doing the right thing. This belief is shown to be evident when Socrates says, "You are sadly mistaken, fellow, if you suppose that a man with even a grain of self-respect should reckon up the risks of living or dying, rather than simply consider, whenever he does something, whether his actions are just or unjust, the deeds of a good man or a bad one." (Defence of Socrates, 28a).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates begins by attacking Meletus, using Meletus’ charge that Socrates is the only person in Athens who is not beneficial to the youth, that he is the only corrupter. Socrates points out that Meletus had never show any concern for the youth until he had the opportunity for a big trial. This is a valid point that Socrates makes and it points out the ridiculousness of the…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates chooses to sacrifice his life to justice. He thinks his motherland raised him up and he had already made the agreement with his State, so he should obey the rules. Besides, he thinks he ought not to return an injustice or an injury to any person, whatever the provocation, so he would not escape from the prison, because this behavior may injure his State. Moreover, it is really important thing is not to live, but to live well, which is the same thing as to live…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was put on trial because he was charged with crimes. The first was “corrupting the youth.” (43) The second was “refusing to acknowledge the gods acknowledged by the city.” (43) The third count was “introducing new divinities.” (43) The reason Socrates was put on trial was because he was going around challenging men about their knowledge and wisdom. He was told by an Oracle that he was the wisest man who lived, but he was skeptical about it, so he went and tested out that theory. He went around questioning men, usually different groups such as politicians or rich men who thought they knew everything about the world. However Socrates always showed them up and they got so angry they decided to take him to trial, for what they call “corrupting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Apology by Plato, Socrates defends himself against the accusations claiming that he corrupts the youth with his teachings. As a Philosopher, or in the context of the text, a juror, or a judge , it is important think critically and logically when examining arguments from both sides of the conflict. One of Socrates’ arguments against the charges brought upon him for corrupting the youth is this: “For if I am really corrupting the youth, and have corrupted some of them already, those of them who have grown up and have become sensible that I gave them bad advice in the days of their youth should come forward as accusers and take their revenge” (Plato). Here, Socrates is making a valid and sound argument refuting his accusations, and although there could be other factors that make his argument false, the argument still resonates with me as sound.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates viewpoint about remaining in jail and being executed is all based on the idea that if he breaks out of jail he would be unjust, and just in general goes against his beliefs. “ Socrates wants to abide by the law because he respected the city as well as the laws that governed Athens. Living by such laws allowed Socrates to lead what he perceived to be the just life, therefore the good life. For Socrates “it is never right to commit injustice or return injustice to defend one self against injury by retaliation. “ “ Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him.” If Socrates would to escape, then it would be breaking the law. Even if he felt that the jury was wrong for convicting him, his intention is not to return a wrong for another wrong. Socrates can’t escape if he thinks that doing that action is unjust, he has personal principles which is that just action is the right action and going against that principle would be unjust. To do an unjust action ruins one soul and life isn’t worth living with a ruined soul. Socrates believed that there was no point in living, if his life was not moral and just. To him quality of his life is more important than the quantity of it. In addition, Athens protects him with right and laws and he feels that in return he has to obey them by being just.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Crito

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates also makes the point that it is better to do right than wrong, no matter what the circumstances. He felt that, although the jurors wronged him by unjustly condemning him, it would still be wrong to violate the laws by escaping. He goes on to say that he does not believe in consciously doing wrong to others as a means of retaliation and that it would indeed undermine his whole life's work. Socrates does not blame the laws which sentenced him, but the people. He goes on to tell Crito that the law has already given him a long and successful life. He explains that he actually owes the city much for his life. He believes that he has a contract with Athens, which would be broken, if he dodged his death. It was under…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the jury finds Socrates guilty, he is surprised at the fact that it was such a close case. He feels as though he has proved something to Meletus, Anytus and Lycon because some saw the goodness in him. At the end of his defense he speaks about death and how he 's not afraid of it, because he knows he is a good man. However when it comes time to propose a punishment, he asks for a small fine and to be allowed to hold up public discourses. In the end he is given the death penalty by…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtue Ethics Theory

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Socrates is considered by many to be a martyr for truth and integrity because of his courage and adherence to traditional beliefs. He was charged with charges of atheism, treason, and corrupting the youth of Athens – all death penalties, just for trying to question tradition. In spite of all the powerful people he offended, no one seemed that eager to kill him and his cell door pretty much remained open for him to escape. Yet, when his execution day arrived, he drank his cup of poison and died. Socrates was determined to force the people of Athens to accept responsibility for their choice of comfortable superstition over logic and reason.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates faced a life ending death penalty, although having a well prepared opportunity to escape;…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He mentions that he is so far along in life as it is, death seems timely, and claims that the jurors would have escaped the irksome task of a hearing had they had a little patience and let Socrates die of natural causes. After hearing that one is to be put to death, most would try whatever is left in his or her power to save themselves. Socrates, however, staying true to his beliefs of truth and justice refuses to “weep and wail” because he feels that doing so would not only dishonor himself, but result him in acting unjustly. “I would much rather die as the result of this defense...in a court of law, just as in warfare, neither I nor any other ought to use his wits to escape death by any means” (p.67). Socrates feels that attempting to run from death would result in admitting himself to evil, which he also suggests the jurors are condemning themselves to by prosecuting an innocent man. Socrates believes to die as a just man, rather than live his life any other way, and attempting to escape the finalized verdict would not only be catering to injustice, but would be seen as an insult to everything Socrates has practiced in his life thus. Therefore, Socrates accepts death as a blessing, and also characterizes it as two possible things; a dreamless sleep, or a migration to another place. For the first, Socrates welcomes this possibility, calling it a “marvelous gain”, considering it calming. If death…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For an argument to be sound there must also be 2 principles that must be met. The first principle is that the argument must be valid, which relates it back to the idea of validity. The second principle that must be met is the premises of the argument must all be true (Wireless Philosophy (Critical Thinking Fundamentals: Soundness). Going back to Socrates’ first premise that no one intentionally causes harm to people. One can argue that as being a true statement as Socrates does in this case. “That it’s all mankind that improves the horses, and just one person who corrupts them? Or is the situation quite the opposite of this, that there’s one person or a very small number of people who can improve them, namely the horse-experts, whereas most people, if they even have anything to do with horses, or use them, actually make them worse?” (Plato 25a-25b p. 41). From what Socrates is stating only a select few can improve the youth, while the majority tend to harm them. No one wants to harm the youth though it happens unintentionally which proves the first premise to be true. Socrates’ second premise states that if he corrupted the youth, he did it unintentionally. This statement would also be true…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial, determination of guilt, and eventual death of Socrates, one of the paramount philosophers in history, on the charge of “corrupting the young and of not believing in the gods in whom the city believes” (Plato 24c) in Athens, perhaps the most famous freedom-loving, democratic city-state of the Western world, is puzzling. In his earlier days, Socrates was once seen as an eccentric headmaster of a school of thinking, a harmless character wandering the streets, than a serious threat to Athenian values and democracy. In Aristophanes’ Clouds, Socrates is depicted as an irreligious natural philosopher and teacher of unjust rhetoric. Years later, he is perceived as a dangerous and possibly treasonous individual. Socrates was being prosecuted for four related reasons: his philosophical positions were critical of the Athenian democratic ideology; he proposed a different kind of moral understanding that threatened the norms of ancient Greece; he taught three notorious traitors to democracy - Alcibiades, Critias, and Charmides; and his complex argumentation caused confusion and irritation among the citizens (Apology Commentary). The decision to prosecute and ultimately execute Socrates was most likely based off his prior involvement in the tumultuous history of Athens in the years preceding his trial.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When I first began to read this passage I was a little confused at the message Callicles was sending to reader and to the philosophers of that time. As I continue to study philosophy I get the sense that most philosophers question the same thing for reason of being. The question of “why” and “what makes…” is the common theme with most things I’ve come across in this course. To read a passage that was written which portrays the negative prospective of philosophy was a bit refreshing to be honest and to say the least. I agreed with most everything Callicles wrote and will reflect upon the passage through the questions provided on this assignment.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays