Preview

Plato and Thrasymachus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1065 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato and Thrasymachus
Platos Notion of Justice vs. Thrasymachus, Why Be Moral?
By: Khonstance Milan
Plato has a different sense of justice than what we ourselves would consider to be justice. Justice starts in the heart and goes outward. Justice is about being a person of good intent towards all people, doing what is believed to be right or moral. Plato believes that once a person has a true understanding of justice that they will want to be “just” for its own benefit regardless of good or bad consequence. Though being just is known to have good consequences also makes being “just” a positive trait. (Clark, 2003, 13) Living a “just” life is good and good is the “well being of well living, the best life is supreme good.” (Bao, 2011, 259) The cause of our happiness is better than being happy itself, which is why this is powerful. We can look at supreme good as experiencing all good things without feelings of regret. (Bao, 2011, 259) Throughout history “just” people have received rewards and praise for being so. Plato believed that any man would be judged for his actions because he believed in an afterlife. He encouraged the myth of Er and believed that people were judged in their afterlife and would pay for the acts they did whether good or evil. Plato saw the soul as being immortal and able to withstand any good or evil that could prevail. Because of this he practiced and encouraged others to “practice justice with reason in every way.” (Clark, 2003, 14) There are three parts to a “just” person. There is reason which should lead the other two parts with the best interest for the whole person. The others, appetite is desire for the things we should do or consume in moderation and spirit is about self honor and victory. (Clark, 2003, 16) When reason leads, a person can be happy and makes them a new kind of strong. This new strong is good and should be dominant. Being “just” from the inside protects the true ego because desire can be seen as external to our personal



Cited: Bao, L. (2011). 'Justice is happiness '?-An analysis of Plato 's strategies in response to challenges from the sophists. Frontiers Of Philosophy In China, 6(2), 258-272. Clark, Kelly James. (2003) The Story of Ethics Fulfilling Our Human Nature. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Rosen, Stanley. (2005). Plat’s Republic: A Study. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/lib/grandcanyon/docDetail.action?docID=101 70841.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thucydides vs Plato

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare and contrast Thucydides’ and Socrates’ analyses of the fate of Athenian democracy in war, of why the Athenians went to war, and of how and why they failed.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politically, Plato explains the paradox of justice and the law. Plato believes that absolute justice is the same for everyone without exception. This justice goes beyond power and or money. He feels justice is not necessarily the law. "Law is an imperfect form of justice." What is legal is not necessarily moral. In Book 1 of Plato 's The Republic, Plato explains that justice is a balance between reason, courage and man 's needs or in other words, the head, the heart and the stomach. He goes on to explain that justice or fairness does not always mean equal. The law may change but justice remains constant. A good rule or law however is a just rule. Plato felt that to get people to act justly one must teach them ethics and values. He also believed that along with these ethics and values we must have a reasonable understanding of these rules. An understanding of these rules is needed so people are more apt to comply with them and therefore maintain a just and fair society.…

    • 2775 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    are right and wrong no matter the content of the act. It should be completely wrong to not treat everyone with respect based on who they are. Race, religion, sex and even medical diagnosis shouldn’t matter. Plato was an absolutist and he thought that as well as things being right and wrong, he thought that goodness itself really exists even after life itself. The highest form, the form of goodness had brought up the question of ‘What is goodness itself?”. Plato thought that goodness itself was the highest form of reality, which is an objective or absolute thing that existed eternally, beyond our limited world. He valued goodness very highly, comparing it to having the same importance that the sun has. We can look at this as having values and realizing that everything is important and good as well as all people. All people have a meaning to our society. We are all different because if we was all the same, we would be complaining of how bored we was. Plato thought that every moral situation was either right or wrong, and that our minds which were “distorted between pleasure and pain” could not perceive circumstances correctly, because we could not…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus once said, “It doesn’t pay to be just”. Ever since the ancient Greek times people have been in search for the perfect meaning of justice. Some have come up with a good definition but even then, there still remains a point to argue proving that the definition incorrect. In Plato’s Republic he starts off with book one, a discussion on what justice is through Socrates. Throughout book one, Socrates argues with Cephalus, Polemarcus and Thrasymachus on why their definition of justice is incorrect. Through the arguments he provides examples as to why people might disagree with the definition. Through the conversation Socrates has with the men Plato proves a connection to his book seven the allegory of the cave. The allegory of the cave is based on how people on only so educated on the area around them because that’s what they grew into. While Dr. Tom Brickhouse, provided a lecture on how to understand Plato’s Republic. Even today people still argue on the true meaning of justice but ones understanding of justice can be is only so because you only know what you have seen and heard.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice played a very important role in Plato’s philosophy. After chastising different theories of justice, he came up with his own theory, he said justice was a human virtue; it is what makes a person good. Individually, justice can make a person good and self-consistent, but socially it could bring harmony to society. Plato’s idea of justice was all about virtue and goodness. Plato also believed that justice was an essential part of an ideal society. Because it brought more light and could cure bad things.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thrasymachus argues for the view that justice is the advantage of the powerful – that it is “simply the interest of the stronger” (Plato’s The Republic, translated by Richard W. Sterling and William C. Scott, page 35). Laws, he says, are specifically “designed to serve the interests of the ruling class” (36). Of course, the ruling class is the strongest class, so it follows that the laws serve the advantage of the strong. The citizens under the ruling class serve “interests [of their strong unjust ruler] and his happiness at the expense of their own” (41). Thrasymachus concludes that “the dynamics of justice, then, consistently operate to advantage the ruler but never the subjects” (41).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His arguments that lead to a just life as the best choice of life are reasonable. If the tyrant is unjust and lives an unhappy life, then it is not worth it. If there is an afterlife, it makes sense that unjust man will be miserable even in the afterlife. Plato is refuting each of the claims that Glaucon makes and that is partially successful. Plato resumes in comparing the just man and the unjust man. The just man is happier compared to the unjust man. Furthermore, after the long argument about the character of the tyrant (587b), Plato resumes the main argument and compares the just and unjust man. He mentions that there is appetite, spirited, and rational desires (437b -580d). These desires determine one’s character. There are three main points here. When Plato argues that fundamentally there are three different desires, I think this a reasonable argument to make the argument for justice…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Just And Unjust

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How does one know if their unjust actions are just? To authentically judge a society one must isolate the just and the unjust. As stated in The Republic by Plato, Now, if we are to form a real judgment of the life of the just and unjust, we must isolate them; there is no other way and how is the isolation to be affected? I answer: Let the unjust man be entirely unjust, and the just man entirely just; nothing is to be taken away from either of them, and both are to be perfectly furnished for the work of their respective lives. (Plato 214)…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his writings he has describes two contrasting views of the important issue that is ultimately asking the question, why be moral? Plato and Thrasymachus represent the different and some-what opposing ideas on this topic of morality and self interest. Thrasymachus believes that the right thing to do is act unjustly or unmorally because one should always proceed to act in one's own self interest. He states, "Why should I be moral when it is not in my interest to be so?" This is called egoism proper. In his mind the perfect life would be to have a great reputation for living in perfect justice while being completely unjust. This would constitute a life of benefits, pleasure and rewards of injustices while still maintaining the reflection of a good…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Republic

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The idea of harmony is very important for Plato to definite justice. As Plato explains: “Justice, I think, is exactly what we said must be established throughout the city when we were founding it that everyone must practice one of the occupations in the city for which he is…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Plato, individual justice mirrors political justice. He discusses the tri-partite soul in his Republic. The tri-partite soul consists of three parts: the rational, the spirited and the appetitive. The rational part of the soul searches after the truth. The spirited part desires honor and is responsible for our feelings of anger and indignation. The appetitive part is lust, especially for money. Justice in the individual is analogous to justice in the society. An individual is just when the three parts of his soul are fulfilling their intended roles. The rational part rules the soul, the spirited part supports the rule of the rational…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critism in Plato

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As Plato 's position forms throughout the Republic, we learn that because of the imbalance of injustice and justice, along with the very intellectual thoughts and beliefs of Socartes and the others, Plato thinks that there are only a few individuals in this world who actually and truly understand how we as human beings should live our…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays