Preview

Plato's philosophy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's philosophy
Plato
Plato's theory of forms was the cornerstone of most of his reasoning, an essential part in his entire philosophy and we can see its influence in all of his philosophy, no matter if his thought is concerned with metaphysics, epistemology or aesthetics.
His the existence of forms was obvious for him. He gives various evidence to support his theory in his dialogs. Plato did provide reasoning to support the existence of the forms. For instance, in one of his dialogues he claims that when he view the world we recognize imperfection in objects. When we look at circular objects, for example, we notice that they fall short of a standard. How do we know that they fall short? Because we have a standard (a form) in our mind of the concept of circularity which is perfect and unchanging. Plato also uses a slave boy's (seeming) knowledge of math (without being taught) to provide reasoning for the existence of the forms. He believed in mind-body dualism and claimed the soul existed before insertion into the body, where it comes to know the forms and "forget" them once housed in the body.
The fact that we are able to perceive perfection in certain objects, that we have understanding of how perfect is supposed to look also seemed as a proof of the theory of forms to Plato. There is no such thing as a perfectly straight line or a perfect circle in the real world, but we have concepts of how they are supposed to look. This means that those concepts, though they are nonspatial, nonphysical and nonmaterial, do exist.
He transferred the idea of existence of ideal form to absolutely every object, created the "realm of forms", a place where the ideal form of every type of objects( or even phenomenon) is stored.
Plato's theory of forms is an elaborate synthesis of Parmenidian and Heraclitean ideas, creating a concept of universe. On the bottom material level we have a Heraclitean world that is constantly changing, but at the same time, on the upper level we have Parmenidean

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The theory of the Forms suggests that there are two worlds in which we live, one is through reality (world of Forms), whilst the other is accessed through our minds (world of Particulars). He highlights that there is only one of each Form while there are many copies of that Form, however, they all share common factors to the Form allowing them to be recognised and compared to. Plato describes the Forms to be perfect, eternal and un-changing whereas the Particulars are imperfect, finite and changing. This can be related to Plato’s conflicting ideas about education in his era, as he believes that the world of Particulars is based on opinion rather than knowledge and so does not approve of this world- the theory of the Forms and the Form of the Good allowed him to express these views showing how the Forms portray the creation of a better, conceptual world. Additionally, Plato describes the Forms to be intelligible, rational and non-corporal which means that his world of Forms cannot be accessed physically and so disproved. This therefore shows the Particulars to be material and corruptible which became a strong ground for us to relate to his theory as the imperfection and continuously changing world…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Plato’s theory of forms proposes that all sensory objects are imitations of Forms, which, like the simplest mathematical equations, are imperishable and forever true.” (Fiero I: 98)…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest criticism Plato faces is what if his theory of the forms, on which he basis his whole philosophy, is not existent? Plato was unable to prove or provide much detail on the forms and what they are, thus many argue against him suggesting that the forms are not…

    • 1451 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before going further into the Forms, knowing more about Plato’s perspective of the world is imperative. The simplest way to describe this is by saying Plato believes instead of one world, two worlds exist. Plato also believes things…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an ongoing debate as to whether Plato’s Theory of Forms truly teaches us anything about the physical or empirical world, with many scientists and philosophers throughout history having very contrasting views. Throughout this essay I will lay down both arguments for and against the above statement and evaluate the outcome.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an Ancient Greek philosopher whose writings and theories have greatly influenced the development of Western philosophy. Perhaps his most famous theory is that of the Forms - pure ideas or concepts of what a THING is. It was Plato’s belief that as well as this world, the material world - or the world of Appearances, as he called it - there exists another dimension, where the true Forms of everything in the material world reside; Reality, or the realm of the Forms.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parmenides and Zeno both influenced Plato in his theory of the Forms, which was intended to satisfy the Parmenidian requirement of metaphysical unity and stability in knowable reality. Zeno's paradoxes aim to prove that Being is single, finite, motionless, and unchanging by examining the absurdities of the opposite "common-sense" hypothesis that several things exist. For example, (pg. 69) the distinction between the visible and the invisible. The body is visible and deceived by the senses, whereas, the soul is invisible and searches for understanding and knowledge on its own. The soul is divine and rules whereas the body is mortal and is ruled. Thus, the conclusion is that the body is human, mortal, multiform, unintelligible, soluble, and never consistently the same, whereas, the soul is divine, deathless, intelligible, uniform, indissoluble, and always the same as itself. The Forms must be incomposite since they are constant and invariable and particular objects in the world are variable and composite. Thus, the Forms are invisible and can only be apprehended by the mind, whereas, the material things can be sensed by the…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Plato uses the forms to discuss almost everything. Forms are general concepts that are used to classify different physical concepts. The forms are non physical, mental concepts. Plato utilizes the forms to prove mind-body dualism. The forms are real things, they exist, and are considered to be more real than physical things. It refers to things that are eternal, perfect, unchanging, and universal. The mind is also eternal, not the brain. Forms are concepts or ideas that help categorize objects. The essence of the Forms is concept and this makes it different from physical objects, and for this reason makes it endless. The senses are not the basis of true knowledge, as they are physical, because they are temporary, changing,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all, his reasoning in the final passage and its conclusions do seem to conclusively prove the existence of the soul after death. However, I am not so convinced that Socrates gives sufficient argumentation to support his premise of the idea of Forms and of a few of the intermediary conclusions. Though Socrates does explain his theory of the Forms for a fair amount in the dialogue and despite it appearing to provide useful explanations to the conception of the ideas of addition and subtraction, which had previously troubled Socrates, argumentation for the foundational aspects of his theory are lacking. There is no explanation for why one ought to accept there being Forms to which any object must have characteristics of or what exactly the relation is between an object and its characteristic Form. This is rather…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato has two main arguments to prove the existence of the soul; the first is the argument from knowledge which argues that learning is simply remembering what the soul has previously known in the world of the forms. We just need to remember it, and this shows that things exist before we learn them for example; gravity existed before we knew it. However, many people argue that learning is not a matter of remembering, but instead is a matter of acquiring new knowledge. The second is the argument for opposites in which Plato argued that the physical world consists of opposites such as big and small, light and…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He thought that everything had a sort of ideal form, like the idea of a chair, and then an actual chair was a sort of poor imitation of the ideal chair that exists only in your mind. One of the ways Plato tried to explain his ideas with the famous metaphor of the cave. He said, suppose there is a cave, and inside the cave there are some men chained up to a wall, so that they can only see the back wall of the cave and nothing else. These men can't see anything outside of the cave, or even see each other clearly, but they can see shadows of what is going on outside the cave. Wouldn't these prisoners come to think that the shadows were real, and that was what things really looked…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays