9/4/2014
Philosophy
Plato's Theory of Forms are defined as the objects or "things" we believe to see in which are not physically there, but in the form in which they are perceived. These Forms described in Plato's theory are only intellectually comprehended not physically. To Plato, nothing that is physical can be "Perfect," perfect only exists in theory. But these Forms are not Ideas, simply because these forms existed before anyone was around to imagine these things. There were always "things" in shapes, or beautiful things, or quanities of things before there were people having ideas or giving names to these things. Plato was aware of the physical sense of things, but believed they had a lesser reality because they can always approximate their form and are always to some extent flawed. Aristotle on the other hand, disagreed with Plato on his theory of forms because he believed Plato's theory to be meaningless. Aristotle's argument against Plato is referred to as the Third man Argument. Aristotle believed that if everything is connected by some type of outside form that relates everything together, there must be another form connecting that form with the first form and so on. He viewed the forms as Universals-Something that more than one individual can be. Saying that something can be connected to more than one thing, so circularity, beauty, largeness and greenness are examples of universals because more than one thing can be circular, beautiful, large or green. So people, or animals or plants are not universals they are particulars because only one thing can be these things. I agree with Aristotle on his idea of proving Plato wrong with universals and particulars. I think that these forms cannot just end with one thing in common, that more than one adjective can be described per object. If something is circular and that is what is in common, say the example are coins, they can also be silver, ridged, small, large, heavy, light, there are many ways of describing an object and their forms would be never ending.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…
- 1179 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…
- 994 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“Plato’s theory of forms proposes that all sensory objects are imitations of Forms, which, like the simplest mathematical equations, are imperishable and forever true.” (Fiero I: 98)…
- 1084 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Complete the table below with descriptions of at least two different features of a telephone system and how / when they would be used.…
- 2416 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…
- 871 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Aristotle sees universals as being the object of understanding things. Aristotle’s views on forms are more connected with the soul. He see the form as not being eternal, unchanging and outside of space. Like for instance the arrangement of matter, because matter is what things are made out of. His definition of the form determines the activities of objects, and what they do exactly. An example of his view on objects is that all things have a natural purpose, and was made to do exactly what it was made to do and nothing else. Aristotle was basically…
- 940 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.…
- 622 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If you’re from Texas, then you are aware of how huge this state really is. Texas happens to be home to three of the top ten largest cities in the country. According to the 2010 US Census, Houston weighs in at number four; San Antonio at number eight; and Dallas at number nine. These big cities being in such close proximity to one another can lead to even bigger rivalries. Dallas, Texas vs. Houston, Texas is a tale as old as time. However, what’s interesting is that a lot of Texans aren’t even sure why this rivalry exists in the first place and how it’s still going so strong. Well, there are a couple of major factors that play a part in this unique rivalry. There’s the big sports rivalries, pop culture differences and similarities, differences…
- 1005 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Plato’s theory of the Forms is one of the most important philosophical concepts. In short, the Forms set a universal standard that particular objects in the physical world are compared to. In order to better understand the Forms and why they exist, however, one must understand more of Plato’s point of view of the world. One must also understand the Form of the Good. The Form of the Good can be relatively hard to grasp but luckily, Plato gives many analogies to help explain the differences between physical objects, the Forms, and the Form of the Good.…
- 1769 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Yet others might disagree with this saying that most people still live in the shadow copy of reality and therefore we can have no clear idea of what reality really is. Even though Plato is theoretically mentioning and discussing the concept of reality in his analogy we can’t prove that the spiritual world is real and if the world of forms is not visible by humans then Plato has no evidence to back his teachings so it is arguably not valid and therefore as Plato has no proper understanding about what reality is and what it isn’t there is no way his analogy can tell us anything about the concept of it.…
- 385 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Aristotle, although the student of Plato, had a very different outlook on the theory of physical and universal forms. He is well known to have provided one of the most famous criticisms of The Forms in his ‘Third Man Argument’. He derived that if a man is a copy of the ‘Form of Man’ and that every object in the physical world has a copy in the World of Forms; there therefore must be a copy of the copy of the ‘Form of Man’. This creates two questions: Is the man in the physical realm simply a copy of the Form of Man? Or is the man a duplicate of the copy of the copy of the Form of Man? This paradox relinquishes the Theory of Forms as apparently meaningless.…
- 745 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…
- 2371 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Furthermore, contained within the Realm of the Forms is the perfect version or copy of everything in the world, and everything in the world is just a copy of the perfect version in the Realm of the Forms, hence the Realm cannot teach us about any physical objects in the world if the object in the Realm is different to all the others on Earth. For example, in the Realm of the Forms will be the perfect version of a chair so, according to Plato, all the chairs in the physical world are copies of the perfect version so the perfect chair cannot teach us anything about a physical chair in the world that we know.…
- 454 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
He thought that everything had a sort of ideal form, like the idea of a chair, and then an actual chair was a sort of poor imitation of the ideal chair that exists only in your mind. One of the ways Plato tried to explain his ideas with the famous metaphor of the cave. He said, suppose there is a cave, and inside the cave there are some men chained up to a wall, so that they can only see the back wall of the cave and nothing else. These men can't see anything outside of the cave, or even see each other clearly, but they can see shadows of what is going on outside the cave. Wouldn't these prisoners come to think that the shadows were real, and that was what things really looked…
- 958 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Plato a property that is abstract or quality is considered a form; if you were to take a property of a certain object and separate the property from the object, that itself would contemplate a form. A basketball could be taken for example here where you can take the roundness of the object being the basketball in this case and separate the roundness from all of the other properties the basketball has like the weight and the color, focusing only of the roundness would be the form of roundness. Again here according to Plato roundness being the property in thought is a property that exist without even thinking about the basketball; the form in this case is an idea of which will exist individually of the ball itself and individually of whether somebody else is thinking of it. In this case it is important to understand that the form of roundness exist in all round objects not only balls; this form participates in the form of all other round objects.…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays