Charge Bargaining and Sentence Bargaining Charge bargaining is a form of plea bargaining. Charge bargaining is when the prosecuting attorney has the capability of negotiating with the accused about the charges that may be filed. This allows for the prosecuting attorney to give the defendant the opportunity to “plead guilty” to lesser charges. (Larry J. Siegel, 2011) An example could be if the accused is pulled over for drinking while intoxicated and has a suspended license; the prosecuting attorney may offer the defendant a plea bargain of pleading guilty to the driving while intoxicated and dismissing the charge of driving with a suspended license. Sentence bargaining is another form of plea bargaining. Sentence bargaining comes in to play when the defendant accepts an agreement to pleading guilty in exchange for spending a less amount of time in jail or prison. (Larry J. Siegel, 2011) An example of a sentence bargain could be if an individual is being charged of murder and they have the death penalty in that particular state; the defendant can plead guilty to the charges in return they receive a sentence of life in prison instead of receiving the death penalty.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Plea Bargaining An advantage for the defense attorney would be that there is less work involved and they still generally will receive around the same amount of money. The main advantage for the prosecuting attorney is they are guaranteed a conviction and can modify the sentencing however they choose. The judicial system relies on plea bargaining in order to keep the criminal justice system going. When there is a case that uses a plea bargain the judge is capable of getting through a case promptly in order to move on to the next case. When it comes to the jail system and the prisons a plea bargain will limit the total amount of inmates that enter into the jails and prisons reducing their time in such facilities or might even suspend jail time and giving probation as part of the plea bargain. There are also disadvantages when it comes to plea bargaining. A disadvantage of a plea bargain would be although the prosecuting attorney and the judge have an agreement, the final decision of the terms of the plea bargain has to go through the court system. The case will go as planned if the courts do not approve the plea bargain. There is a major disadvantage when it comes to the defendant, as soon as the defendant signs the plea bargain agreement and then pleads guilty in the courtroom in front of the judge he or she will no longer be able to file for an appeal.
Due Process Due process in the criminal justice system, a plea bargain will most likely work in the favor of the criminal justice system. A plea bargain can allow for the defendant to get out of a more severe criminal charge by pleading to a charge of a lesser degree. In order to ensure that due process is respected for an individual’s legal procedures generally make it more difficult to arrest, prosecute or sentence an alleged criminal, in order to make sure the defendant’s rights are fully protected. With that being said plea bargaining can help to ensure that an alleged criminal is convicted. Crime control is an effective way to ensure the safety for the communities. Standardized procedures allows for efficient processing of as many crimes and criminals as possible. Minimal infringement of rights is acceptable for crime control.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A Plea is a formal statement by or on behalf of a defendant or prisoner saying weather they are guilt or innocence.…
- 1683 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In other occasions court administrators, prosecutors and judges prefer to go for plea bargains to help reduce case volumes and in other cases granted time to the parties so they can prepare themselves for the case or to obtain further documentation to avoid losing time during the next hearing moving the case for a date where they might not have such big overload. Another option that the court administrators recur is to divide cases upon the crime in order to fit all short non complicated crimes in a day vs. having many complicated cases all together in one day since that would delay the case flow.…
- 1550 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Cole, Plea-bargaining is negotiating a settlement between the prosecutor and the defense attorney, that would exchange a guilty plea for a lighter sentence.. Generally if the prosecutor is willing to lower the sentence, the defense will accept and plea guilty to the crime he or she was accused of. Roughly thirty-five years ago, plea-bargaining was not discussed outside of the courtroom. It was a “secret” of the court and done behind closed doors. Now, people know what plea-bargaining is, and is now a very controversial subject in society. There are positives and negative aspects of plea-bargaining in the case of Councilman…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to plea bargaining, there are two different types that can be offered to the defendant by the prosecutor: sentence bargaining and charge bargaining. Sentence bargaining is when the accused is informed of what the sentence will be with a guilty plea and is useful in helping the prosecutor to obtain a conviction by offering the minimum, instead of the maximum sentence for the charge. If the defendant is facing serious charges and does not want to chance receiving a maximum sentence during trial, they may enter a guilty plea in order to serve the least amount of time possible. Charge bargaining is when the prosecutor offers to either charge the accused with a lesser charge, or to reduce the number of charges that have been filed against him/her, in exchange for a guilty plea. For example, if the defendant is charged with a DUI, driving with an expired license, and driving with expired…
- 1298 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…
- 182 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…
- 177 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There are many functions of any court system. The primary function of the criminal courts in society is to help keep domestic peace. Criminal court is one of the major components of the criminal justice system. When an arrest is made it is the judge and prosecutor who are in charge of deciding what punishment will be sufficient as well as if it is necessary to take the case to trial (Steven Barkan, Law and Society: An Introduction, 279-280. Pearson Education, Inc. 2009). If everything works as it is intended to work, those who are guilty will be found guilty, those who are innocent will be found innocent, and it will not be determined by the defendant’s social class, race/ethnicity, or gender (Steven Barkan, Law and Society: An Introduction, 279-280. Pearson Education, Inc. 2009). Unfortunately, just like most things, the criminal court system is not void of flaws. There are still innocent people that are found guilty and guilty people who are found innocent. There have even been innocent people who have been executed in states the practice the death penalty.…
- 1694 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…
- 240 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Plea-bargaining has been practiced in the criminal justice system for over 300 years. Controversial cases have brought plea bargains to the forefront and have created bias towards this practice. However, if plea bargains were not implemented, a chaotic and expensive justice system would be created. With such cases bringing a negative view to plea-bargaining, this research paper aims to show the positives and negatives of plea-bargaining. Critics of plea-bargaining believe that sentences demonstrate to be more lenient to the defendants, contributes to the issue of mass incarceration, and how the Crown persuades defendants into pleading guilty. Nevertheless, supporters of plea bargains find that plea deals are beginning to including the victims…
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…
- 127 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Plea bargaining is being scrutinized and criticized for a variety of reasons. Many believe that plea bargaining is fair as it gives a possible offender the ability to negotiate a less severe sentence. If the offender is in fact innocent all he has to do is go trial and prove it and he will be released. However plea bargaining has contributed to the imprisoning of innocent individuals. The prosecutor also has an unfair advantage over the defense thus making plea bargaining an unfair practice. These reasons are why plea bargaining is a negative practice and should be changed.…
- 642 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many references found on the subject of plea bargaining project the same message as to why the process has become such a common element of the justice system. The universal missive seems to be advantage for all parties involved, even the victim.…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
An individual is accuse for committing a crime and goes to jail. The court is going to offer a Plea bargain in which the defendant will declare guilty and the sentence will be reduce. This settlement will obligate the defendant to follow certain conditions and rules. Now, who benefits from it? According to the film The Plea, society will. Plea bargains are the best asset for the court system to keep the system flowing. The less people in jail, the less money the government has to spend. The less time with a case the less money being spent. The defendant, in other hands, may benefit or not. The film clearly shows how people’s life can be affected after pleading guilty. First, they will not have the right to have 12 people hear what really happened. Many innocent people are offered plea bargains for crimes they did not commit. The benefits from pleading guilty is that a sentence may be reduce or even revoke. The benefits to society overweigh the cost of the individuals when he/she is guilty of a crime, but it doesn’t when an individual has to declare guilty for a crime they did not commit.…
- 444 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In my opinion, plea bargaining can be a very proactive part of the criminal justice system. In order to achieve this, prosecutors need to be fair when applying charges to the defendants. The defendant by pleading guilty to a lesser charge is not being deprived of his rights; instead he is opting out of his rights by accepting the lesser charge.…
- 2152 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays