Pointillism: Application Is Value Of Knowledge Or Not?

Mr. John Dewey’s words are as valid as they were at the time. Knowledge is assurances, information, and capacities acquired through experience or preparing and the speculative or down to earth appreciation of a subject. As I see it, this statement talks about whether application defines value of knowledge or not. On firth thoughts, I am inclined to believe that application is indeed important for knowledge to hold value. Suppose there arises a circumstance wherein this information and these capacities are increased through experience and preparing. In this case, if the application or utilization of that specific learning or knowledge were not to be done, then the preparation or practice would be lost; accordingly the knowledge’s value would
Pointillism is a strategy of painting in which little, unmistakable specks of shading are connected in examples to shape a picture. The procedure depends on the capacity of the eye and psyche of the viewer to mix the shading spots into a more full scope of tones. The routine of Pointillism is in sharp differentiation to the conventional systems for mixing colors on a palette. Pointillism is practically equivalent to the four-shading CMYK printing procedure utilized by some shading printers and vast presses that place specks of Cyan (blue), Maroon (red), Yellow, and Key (dark).Pointillism would not have been useful until and unless he applied it, sold the painting and made that technique famous. Therefore, in this case application of knowledge was
Let’s take one of the painting made by Picasso for instance, Man with a Pipe;when it was kept for sale the purchase though didn’t have applied it but was able to appreciate it on the basis of prior knowledge or theoretical knowledge he pursued. Functional information or Hypothetical learning. Both are great. Regardless of the possibility that one doesn't make a difference, in actuality. A few times hypothesis is every one of the one can do and later on somebody can test it and apply this and may be even tweak that I know how to play a violin in principle and basically. Be that as it may, I don't show nor play. That’s, doesn't mean the information or aptitude is squandered. It has satisfied me in a way and I will above and beyond, may be accomplish something else than turning into a violin player. Simply having some information doesn't mean we have to put practically speaking. I know how to make a cavity. I don't have to impart this to everybody. In doing as such, envision the annihilation I will be in charge of. Some information are sacrosanct privileged insights. Its best if not imparted or presumably shared to choose few, likely never put practically speaking. On the off chance that you are searching and putting away information not out of