Preview

Pojman's Theory Of Ethical Relativism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pojman's Theory Of Ethical Relativism
People are what they believe, what norms and customs, and laws governing them, people are their culture. Morality is the set of principles or system of conducts in society that distinguish between right and wrong or bad and good behaviors. The morality of society varies with the customs and the beliefs of the family. Ethical relativism is one of the philosophical theories that assert that the vindication of morality is relative to one’s culture. The fact that whether an action or value is morally upright is dependent on the norm of the society. The action proven as morally upright in one society can be proven as wrong or right with another. This underscores a critical discussion on the theory of ethical relativity according to Pojman.
The philosophy
…show more content…
Practices such as norms regarding decency and dressing may be localized to a given area since they are dictated by people’s thoughts and belief. Conversely, other practices such as political repression, torture, and slavery may be judged wrong universally despite the different beliefs that exist among the many diverse cultures.
Other philosophers claim that the wrongness or rightness of an action or practice is governed by the norm and customs of society. That implies that the members of that society are prisoners to the custom. They continue to say that this kind of a scenario enhances social conformity whereas it eliminates moral opinions and social consensus. For example, in society, people differ ideologically on what is wrong or right a good example is the lack of social consensus on the topic of abortion.
Most importantly, from what seems to be the strongest critic of ethical relativism is that universal moral standards exist regardless of the difference in the beliefs and moral practices among cultures. People can still acknowledge the presence, the different beliefs, culture, and their influence and again acknowledge that practices are morally
…show more content…
The morality of a practice is dictated by what a particular ethnic group thinks is wrong or right. Any action or practice is only considered true if it is within the confines of the community’s customs and norms. This is what the theory of ethical relativism states. The theory has faced a lot of critics from different philosophers such as Luis Pojman saying that the fact that a practice or an action is considered wrong by an individual ethnic does not hinder the same practice to be declared wrong universally since basic principle applies to all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cultural Relativism is defined in Lewis Vaughn’s “Beginning Ethic: an Introduction to Moral Philosophy” as the view that an action is correct morally if the culture deems it so (pg. 30). This differs from Objectivism, which believes that some moral truths “are valid for everyone” or universal (pg. 29). All cultures have different views on what is right and wrong from a moral standpoint. The beliefs in one place are different in other place because both cultures have different heritages. This does not make the other cultures moral views any less correct than that of you own. Therefore, the concept of cultural relativism true. Supporters of the objectivism would say that having universal truths would prevent, in their view, action deemed morally…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of us like to believe that we are all born of sin and into sin regardless of what culture, race, ethnic identity, or class. We all have a sense of what is morally right and the relativity of it. There are traits, customs, and beliefs that make us distinctive to certain cultures, races, and classes, which due to the differences we all follow, a set of different moral standards. Each culture tackles moral questions based on their own moral beliefs. Universal moral requirements are presented to show that through differences there is still a huge connection of moral beliefs to show that we are more alike, than we as humans are willing to admit. Relativism maintains when it comes to right and wrong there is neither, because what is virtuous within a particular individual, culture or societies morality must be understood and taken into consideration (Mosser, 2010).…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Ethics universal? Is it wrong to steal from someone regardless of what the culture you are in says on the matter? What about funeral customs? Is there a right or wrong way to deal with the bodies of those who have died? Some philosophers believe that there is no universal right or wrong and that the correct way to do things is based on what the morals of individual cultures say. Others, such as James Rachels, believe that there is a universal code of ethics that transcends the moral codes of individual cultures. In his essay, “Morality is Not Relative”, Rachels discusses ethical relativism, or as he calls it “Cultural Relativism”, and the logical problems that are associated with this code.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Pojman stands for objectivism instead of relativism in morality. Ethical relativism is “the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles”. Ethical relativism however is different from moral doubt where valid moral principles do not exist at all. Pojman argues that what is considered as morally right or wrong varies from society to society. Pojman proposes that ethical relativism can be seen as a good thing but can get hard when getting into the details.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What one may believe is right and worthy in their own culture may seem taboo in another culture’s standards. This is because of the use of cultural relativism, which is the belief that something is good or wrong if and only if it is approved or disapproved in a given culture. Right and wrong values vary from society to society; therefore, there is no standard base to judge what is universally right or wrong between the different cultures. Because of this, societies may disagree about the morality of what is right and wrong. Gensler believes that if cultural relativism is true, then there are no right or wrong moral values within a culture’s belief, because objective truths can still exist.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality and ethics create the bridge between the savage and rational side of each human being. With the intent of explaining morality, Pojman displays three different types of ethical backgrounds. The first being ethical relativism which states that an individual’s beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of the person’s own culture. This idea explains whether or not morality is only a fragment of a person’s cultural norm instead of anything truly universal. For example, in some countries, torture, racism and sexism is part of the cultural norm compared to some others countries, those behaviors are intolerable.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm Outline

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral relativism is a plausible doctrine, and it has important implications for how we conduct our lives, organize our societies and deal with others.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What's ideal for my way of life won't really be what's appropriate for your way of life. No ethical standards are valid for all individuals constantly and in all spots. Moral relativism speaks to the position that there are no ethical absolutes, no ethical set in stone.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics