The philosophy …show more content…
Practices such as norms regarding decency and dressing may be localized to a given area since they are dictated by people’s thoughts and belief. Conversely, other practices such as political repression, torture, and slavery may be judged wrong universally despite the different beliefs that exist among the many diverse cultures.
Other philosophers claim that the wrongness or rightness of an action or practice is governed by the norm and customs of society. That implies that the members of that society are prisoners to the custom. They continue to say that this kind of a scenario enhances social conformity whereas it eliminates moral opinions and social consensus. For example, in society, people differ ideologically on what is wrong or right a good example is the lack of social consensus on the topic of abortion.
Most importantly, from what seems to be the strongest critic of ethical relativism is that universal moral standards exist regardless of the difference in the beliefs and moral practices among cultures. People can still acknowledge the presence, the different beliefs, culture, and their influence and again acknowledge that practices are morally …show more content…
The morality of a practice is dictated by what a particular ethnic group thinks is wrong or right. Any action or practice is only considered true if it is within the confines of the community’s customs and norms. This is what the theory of ethical relativism states. The theory has faced a lot of critics from different philosophers such as Luis Pojman saying that the fact that a practice or an action is considered wrong by an individual ethnic does not hinder the same practice to be declared wrong universally since basic principle applies to all