Preview

Police Officer Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Police Officer Research Paper
Searches are to protect the officer

First affirmative constructive:

Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially decrease its authority to detain without charge or to search without probable cause

Starting with definitions first is Federal Government “an organization established by the US constitution to make and enforce the laws for the US”.

We would like to draw a distinction between the government authorities ( such as police officers, DEA, FBI etc) and u.s armed forces, The distinction from the military is important, especially because the military may be an enforcement arm of the government. but under posse comitatus active military personnel cannot be used to “execute the laws” except where explicitly authorized by Constitution or Congress (for examples cases of martial law).
(Making this distinction narrows the scope of the resolution a bit since posse comitatus has been law since Civil War reconstruction.

The second term we would like too define is
…show more content…

The problem with states quo is that it stacks authority in the governments favor, Giving them the ability to justify searches whether or not they have probable cause or justifiable means to conduct those searches. This is our plan to solve the authority imbalance with the status quo

1. The exterior of your house has the same legal protection as the inside of your house, both are private property this must be recognized by all local and federal courts of justice and cannot be disputed. Congress

Sub A) The exterior of a private domain is not under the same legal implications as someone with possession of drugs or weapons on public or government property.

2. An officer cannot search for drugs at a traffic otherwise legal checkpoint unless probable suspicion of intoxication is evident.

Sub A) sobriety test must be failed for officers to ensue a following search on the subjects vehicle or private


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Two men were suspected of bootlegging. The police pulled them over and discovered illegal liquor in the trunk of their automobile. The defendants argued there was no warrant served allowing police to search their vehicle, therefore, the evidence should be suppressed. The Court disagreed, reasoning it was impractical to obtain a warrant due the mobility of an automobile. The Court noted difference between buildings and automobiles. Automobiles have the ability to leave the jurisdiction, taking the evidence with them, before a warrant could be obtained. The ruling in Carroll v United States enacted warrantless searches of vehicles are permissible if there was “probable cause” to believe contraband could be in the vehicle and belief that the vehicle could be moved before the officer could get a warrant. This became known as the “automobile…

    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant (2009) SCOTUS rule held that the Belton rule was revised as the justices stated that it did not give authority for the police officers to search an arrestee’s vehicle if the occupant had been arrested and therefore could not access the interior of the car. This implies that the police should only search the arrestee and places that could be reached. Gant could no longer reach the interior of his car, and there was no reasonable ground to suppose that a search would produce evidence to support the offense of driving on a suspended license. Gant v. Arizona established that a search of a vehicle after an arrest is permissible when the arrestee is not confined, and the passenger compartment is within their immediate reach.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8)Did the court find that there were sufficient parts and instructions available to conclude that the defendant did, in fact, possess an illegal weapon?…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. May a law enforcement officer conduct an automobile search as an incident to all lawful arrests, or must the officer reasonably fear for his own safety or for the integrity of the evidence before searching the automobile?…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robinette was stopped for speeding. After running his license through the system, Robinette was issued a verbal warning from the officer. The officer then asked Robinette to step out of the car and if any illegal weapons or drugs was in the vehicle. Robinette responded “no” and consented to the officer’s request to search the vehicle. A small amount of marijuana and a MDMA pill was found in the car. Robinette was then arrested.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 'Empire', of Saturday 3rd October 1863, again stated and as had been continually reported in the all the newspapers, that dissatisfaction with the NSW police force was raging through the NSW Parliament, with many members outraged over the conduct of the police force during Ben Hall’s current depredations to date against the local populace and the blatant lack of effort of the states police force. Mr. Cowper was under sustained attack and the members were wrestling with the call for change led by Mr.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Constitution, Officer Wheetley did not have any legal right to search Harris’ car prior to the walk about with Aldo. Once Aldo indicated that there may be drugs in the car, then a limited warrantless search was appropriate, which resulting in the finding of drugs. But was Aldo even needed in this situation? Officer Wheetley had no reason to suspect Harris of having drugs in his vehicle, except that he was acting suspicious, which should not be enough probable cause because thinking that someone is ‘acting suspicious’ can be subjective. Furthermore, the use of drug sniffing dogs in general has been questioned due to their inconsistency of detecting the drugs that they are trained to locate and apprehend in various…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ssd4 mod 1

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. who retains the authority to approve use of combat command resources for assistance to civil authorities?…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dui Assignment

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    B) Refusing to perform chemical test when being arrested for dui will cause you to lose driving privileges for a minimum of 6 months to 1 year.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    States broke many of their rights as U.S citizens like their right of freedom from vacant searches,…

    • 788 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department is an agency of highly disciplined and trained people whom sometimes, although not terribly often, do the wrong thing. We were taught at an extremely young age that the police are friends of the community. There are honest and dishonest people in all societies, as well as in the police department. A police officer’s mission is to enforce the law which citizens mandate through Congress.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I find that the evidence would still be valid based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. The good faith exception states “that If officers had a reasonable, good-faith belief that they were acting per legal authority, such as by relying on a search warrant that is later found to have been legally defective, the illegally seized evidence is admissible” (Busby, 2009). The good faith exception was established by a 6-3 U.S Supreme court decision in the United States v. Leon 468 U.S. 897 (1984). The majority opinion, as written by Bryon R. White, was that the exclusionary rule was established to deter law enforcements violations of the 4th amendment warranting against illegal search and seizure. Therefore “reliable physical evidence seized by officers reasonably relying on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate” did not violate the exclusionary rule and the evidence was to be admitted (Kaye, 2011). The good faith exception was reviewed and expanded in Arizona v. Evans 514 U.S. 1 (1995), a case that I feel directly correlates to my decision reference the admissibility of the evidence in the example given. In Arizona v. Evans an officer conducts a legal traffic stop. Upon running the driver’s license the officer discovers an outstanding warrant for arrest. Pursuant to the arrest a search was conduct and marijuana discovered. When charging Evan’s when possession the officers discovered that the warrant had been quashed. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that this was not a violation of Evan’s 4th Amendment rights since the evidence, though obtained based on an illegal warrant, was legal based on the good faith…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Limited Government-the power of government to intervene in the exercise of civil liberties is restricted by law because it has been written in the constitution…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. The officer’s observation of the evidence must be lawful, meaning the officer had a legal right to be at the location, or the suspect did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location,…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    is the use of a Militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays