Police Profiling Essay

Profiling has long been a subject of contempt when it comes to policing. Immediately following the attacks of 9/11, there was a surge in profiling in the United States. One can assume that the uptick in profiling stems from the horrid events that transpired on the day the United States was struck the hardest. In the aftermath of the 9/11 events, the predictive analysis tools were used by the intelligence community to assess and or thwart potential threats. This technique was supposed to be used to collect information that can be shared across the intelligence community. Somehow, the vision for this technique became skewed over time and is now used as a means for policing the general public.
According to Erik Kleinsmith, “Rather than making assumptions about a single person or group solely based on race, ethnicity, religion, or skin color, threat profiling
thwarting threats from enemies of the United States. In any other context, the use of profiling may not be the most ideal way to handle everyday problems within a community. Any profiling other than behavioral that is used by state and local police departments is not only ineffective, it also undermines the confidence the public has in its law enforcement officers. Furthermore, the profiling tactics used by some of law enforcement departments also violates the civil and constitutional rights of American citizens. It is clear, any profiling tactics other than behavioral that is currently being used by law enforcement agencies within the United States must change. In order to be successful in keeping the public safe, law enforcement agencies across the United States have to be able to regain public trust and work together for the common good. The challenge of creating safer communities in the United States relies heavily on whether or not people residing in the community can place their trust in law enforcement leaders to do the right