Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Political And Economic Reason Of Englis

Good Essays
733 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political And Economic Reason Of Englis
Jack Zhou
11/05/2014
AP European History
Mr. Fisher
Political and economic problems that leads to the civil war At the turn of the 17 century, England, like many other European countries started centralizing their government. The country become stable and powerful under Elizabeth’s polique rule. However, after her death, leaders such as James I and Charles I undo her improvements, as they create political and economic problem that eventually lead to the civil war. During and at the death of Elizabeth, England was unarguable at a Golden Age. It’s an English renaissance that is symbolized by renewed national pride, increased central power, religious peace and naval triumph over the hated Catholic Spanish armada. On comparison, The Stuart period seems much darker. The first Stuart on the throne, James I, had experience of ruling as the king of Scotland. However, this did not prepare him for England, as the lack of parliament make him used to doing whatever he wants, without the opinion and voices of the nobles. He often disagree with the parliaments, thus in a way slowing fracturing England into two side. He also came up with the new extended version of the “divine right of kings”, which greatly distressed the parliament for it promotes absolutism. In reaction to that, the parliament often acted to obstruct and stop the king instead of helping him and the central government. His religion also become a serious problem, as unlike Anglican and Catholic, who have no difference in worshiping and services, Puritans have huge difference between the Anglican. Puritan does not have any showy things, such as elaborate services and churches, and hymns. This isolates the Anglican Englishman, as James should be the leader of the church, not someone of other religious. Also the facts that James is English farther discredit him from the people. His successor, Charles the first, did much worse. He had many conflict with the parliament. Notable when he raised the short parliament to ask for money to deal with the bishop war. The parliament denied his request and was dissolved 3 week later. He is forced to call them again at the end of the year, and lose many rights and privileges in order to pass the emergency tax. This no doubt made the king a laughing stock, and made more people believe that it’s possible to defeat the “divine” king. After this the parliament now have the power of the purse, power to control all new taxes in England, and many other rights. Both side become more hostile toward each other, and the idea that Charles called the Irish catholic to attack England further alienate him. The last string is when Charles tries to arrest two member of the parliament for high treason, but cannot find them. In early 1642, all cities declared their sympathies toward one faction or the other. The Civil war begins. Another big reason of the civil war it’s the crown’s economic problems. The English crown must rely on the parliament for taxes because of the power of the purse. This made dealing with them more difficult, as James must see them more often than they wanted, as they often argue about other thing during it. In his meeting, they grant Charles 1 year of tonnage and poundage, rather than the custom lifetime grant. After the year, Charles keeping taxing, without parliament’s approval. During his Personal Rule, Charles revived many old taxes, for example the collection of forced loan. These taxes not only slowed down economic growth of England, and also anger the populace and made them more likely to take side against him. The Stuart also wasted a lot of money for personal interest, as they patrons many art and projects, most famously King James Bible. Later when the Scots rebelled, Charles is forced to call the short parliaments, but dissolved it in anger as they present many requirement for the money. He is forced to call another parliament it 6 month later, and granted them the privileges. The economic reliance of the crown no doubt encouraged the parliament to no end. This parliament eventually led the rebellion against the king. Overall, all these problems, both economic and political, are caused by James and Charles. Their different ideology and ethic separated the close relationship between the crown and the parliaments that Elizabeth so carefully work on, which eventually lead to war between the two.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Ap Euro Review Packet

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The House of Stuart is a European royal house. It was founded by Robert II of Scotland, and the Stewarts first became monarchs of the Kingdom of Scotland during the late 14th century, and subsequently held the position of the Kings of Great Britain and Ireland. Their patrilineal ancestors had held the title High Steward of Scotland since the 12th century, after arriving by way of Norman England. The dynasty inherited further territory by the 17th century which covered the entire British Isles, including the Kingdom of England and Kingdom of Ireland, also upholding a claim to the Kingdom of France. The significance of the Stuarts is that they were the first kings of the United Kingdom and that they brought disaster to England.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap American History Dbq

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 1630 's, there was a religious civil war. This war was between the Puritans, also known as the Protestants, and the Cavaliers, also known as the Catholics. This relgious war lasted from the year 1642 until the year of 1651. During this time, King Charles I was the monarch of England. His father, James I was ruler prior. James did not change anything about England after Queen Elizabeth 's death. He did not change the government, nor the religion. Unlike his father, Charles believed that Catholicism must be enforced in England. Because of Charles and his changing of religion, the civil war in England took place.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    determinant of the American Civil War. The North was invested into a fast moving industrial…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the American revolution Britain received a tremendous shock to its system with the loss of the thirteen colonies. The war revealed Britain’s limitations and this heightened dissension and escalated political antagonism towards the monarch, George III, and his ministers. At this time the main issues concerning parliament were now representation, parliamentary reform, and government retrenchment.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Queen Elizabeth I passed away, James Stuart took over as ruler, which led the New England society to be based on “religious and economic forces.” (Jones, Wood, Borstelmann, May, Ruiz 35). The New England colonies were founded in search of seeking religious freedom from the Anglican Church, leading to Puritanism. Jones, Borstelmann, May, and Ruiz argued from the textbook that the Anglican Church shouldn’t be secured to a monarchy, but should be self-governing based on certain religious beliefs. (40). New England’s economy was also suffering around this time. “New England faced peculiar disadvantages, beginning with the soil…New Englanders found no staple crop that could be sold back directly to Britain to create a balance of trade.” (Jones, Borstelmann, May, Ruiz 117). The economic downfall that New England was facing led them to go out to sea to alleviate the economy.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a beginning push to the movement of the revolution. England eventually found a new power…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Charles I and James I tried to rule without parliament’s consent, but parliament’s control at the time was so great that neither Charles nor James were able to successfully decrease its role in English government. In the Bill of Rights, it is declared by parliament that certain actions are illegal without consent of parliament. For example, “The king’s supposed power of suspending laws without the consent of parliament is illegal” (James Madison). The English were not ready to give all the power of government to a single person because they had been under the combined rule of both the king and the assembly for such an extended time. Parliament, where members could be elected and changed as necessary, as opposed to an absolute monarch with no restraints, was supported by land-owning nobles and merchants. In 1642, differences between parliament and Charles I sparked England's civil war, which was partially caused by the refusal of parliament to give up their power in government and partly by royal stubbornness to share control of the country. This was the chief turning point for absolutism in England. Beginning with Charles II, monarchs realized the amount of power Parliament had and knew that instead of working against one another, they had to work with each other. Since parliament was so centralized and so stalwartly entrenched into the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To fully understand the causes of the breakdown we need to look what inherited problems James had to face. Elizabeth had created a debt of £400,000 which was passed onto James, so already he faced severe financial problems. On top of this was the 16th century price rise, which had created an inflation of 400%. This created the ‘Canker of want' (James) where income was less than expenditure. Inflation had seriously decreased the value of subsidies granted by parliament from £140,000 in 1500 to £72,500 in 1600. James was not happy with ‘the greatness of my debt and the smallest of my means'. Fixed rents and poor management of his feudal dues created even more problems for James; he could no longer ‘Live of his own' and had to rely on money from parliament. As Russell said ‘ The Stuarts inherited a financial system that was already at the point of breakdown'.…

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1558 Elizabeth inherited a throne encumbered with various internal and external problems, due to the actions in previous reigns of the ‘little Tudors’. Internal problems referred to predicaments occurring in England and personal issues with the monarch, e.g. the religious settlement of Catholicism in Mary Tudors reign and rebellions posed a significant problem of domestic policy at the beginning of Elizabeth’s reign. External problems refereed to dilemmas occurring outside of England, e.g. Mary’s loss of Calais in 1558 produced the external possibility of French invasion during Elizabeth’s reign. Along with debasement of the coinage and inflationary pressures, it is evident that Elizabeth was presented with formidable problems at the beginning of her reign.…

    • 2462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late fourteenth to mid-sixteenth century, Great Britain underwent massive changes throughout the entire realm. From the new system of deposing kings to religious upheavals, England during this time had a hard time finding peace. During those two hundred years, personal ambition of kings and nobles was the most disruptive to English society, which was exacerbated by the religious break instituted by Henry VIII in 1534.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initially, both the Yankees and the Rebels approached the task of acquiring intelligence in their own way. During this…

    • 5565 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1861 delegates from all over the south met in Montgomery, Alabama, to establish a new nation. This new nation would be called the Confederate States of America, declaring itself a provisional(temporary) Congress. “The countries that attended this convention were Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas. Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens were chosen unanimously as the provisional president and the vice president in order to convince the other undecided slave states to join the Confederacy. A committee spent five weeks composing a national constitution, that was later approved on March 11. The document closely followed the U.S. Constitution-including its Bill of Rights-with a few notable differences. Language supporting "the general welfare" was taken away, while the right to own slaves was clearly assured even though foreign slave trade was not allowed.”#…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first ever civil war broke about between King Charles I and his parliament. To name, there are many causes which lead up to this, three major which are: money, power, and religion. It was said that Charles I wasn’t a strong king as was his father (King James VI and I) yet some blame parliament for their arrogance to the new power. This essay will explain the three causes, their triggers and which was the most important cause of the first ever Civil War in England.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays