From their earliest establishment, political parties have been controversial aspects of society that have both made the United Sates strong and weak. However, though beneficial in some ways, the early political parties served a harmful purpose by moving politicians' focuses away from the majority's needs and instead onto political desires and party expectations.
In particular, Presidents George Washington and John Adams enacted strictly Federalist views through Washington's Whiskey Tax and the Alien and Sedition Acts, while Republican Presidents Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson continued to stop the United States with their political allegiances by obstinately following party beliefs despite what was best for the country, as in the case with Jefferson's limitation of the American Navy and Jackson's Bank War.
The Federalist presidents cramp American prosperity by favoring the upper class and limiting the Republican Party with restrictive and unconstitutional policies. During Washington's presidency, Alexander Hamilton enacted two new taxes in an effort to raise governmental funds: a tax on the distillers of alcohol, particularly whiskey, and a tariff on imports. However, since only common men made up the whiskey distillers, this new tax in no way affected the social elites; instead of catering to the desires of the majority population, Washington and Hamilton's policies served the interests of the upper class alone. This Federalist favoritism caused outrage amongst the common majority, and in 1794 Pennsylvanian farmers rose up against the tax in the Whiskey Rebellion.
The issues caused by political parties continued on with the next Federalist president, John Adams. In an attempt to limit the rival Republican Party, Adams enacted the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. By making the process of becoming an American citizen more difficult while allowing the government to persecute anyone guilty of sedition, Adams both deterred immigration to America and temporarily limited freedom of speech. Instead of upholding the values of the United States, Adams became set upon the destruction of a rival political party and lost sight of serving the people's best interests.
These issues persisted with the slanderous election of 1800 and Adams' midnight appointments based entirely on biased political preference.
During the early Republican presidencies, strict adherence to party beliefs continued to hinder the American political system. When Thomas Jefferson won the election of 1800 and became the first Republican president, he began to undo certain Federalist institutions in accordance with his Republican distrust of centralized power, as with his downsizing of the armed forces. This act, motivated by Republican reasoning, soon proved to actually endanger the country. The emergence of the Barbary pirates in the Mediterranean during the late 18th century and their sudden harassment of American ships caught the United States with no means of self-protection, and Jefferson was forced to build up the American navy once again.
The impeachment of Samuel Chase and Jefferson's policy of nullification further demonstrate ways in which unfaltering political allegiance during Jefferson's time negatively impacted the entire political system. President Andrew Jackson's distrust of centralized power also caused severe political issues; by waging a war against the bank and with it Nicholas Biddle, Jackson caused the collapse of the U.S. economy, all due to differing political views.
The creation of political parties initially resulted in a system greatly hindered by rivalries and filled with distractions that diverted politicians from serving the American public as a whole, while dividing and corrupting American politics. However, political parties of the modern world have greatly evolved since this time and today are sophisticated factions that better serve to represent the citizens.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During Jefferson’s presidency, he implemented an embargo that required a strong central government to enforce.(Doc F) As a result of the embargo, manufacturing grew more rapidly under Jefferson than that of the federalist leader. With the band of trade, America became dependent on nation made products which helped grow the manufacturing industry drastically. By 1812, John Adams began to approve of the two Republican presidents’ restoration of the taxes and the Navy.(Doc G) Jefferson had restored taxes while he held office, while Madison worked on building back up the Navy. Even though the Founding Fathers were both finding a moderate ground, others were not adjusting. During both presidencies, the tariffs kept and enforced were disliked by some Republicans. Southern Democratic-Republican farmers rejected the protective tariff created by Madison because it lead to higher prices.(Doc H) These tariffs were set by Hamilton, and enhanced by Republican…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Everywhere in American history, there are differences in ideas on how to run a country. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were no exception while they were members of George Washington’s cabinet. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton both had opposite views on how to run the country. Jefferson was the Secretary of State and an Anti-Federalist and Hamilton was Treasure of State and a Federalist making them opposite political parties and hating each other. The Federalist were a group of wealthy people and pro strong federal power, on the other hand anti-Federalist were pro protecting the state and equality for all people. Both these men wanted to run the country in the way of their political party. Both men had similar and opposing views on the Constitution, economic issues, and individual rights for people. The opposing views between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the separation of the political parties.…
- 293 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Thomas Jefferson differed from federalists because he represented predominantly the southern states and their agricultural values. Many democratic-republicans did not care for commerce and manufacturing in spite of it being the federalists, primarily northerners, backbone of economy. Jefferson believed that a society would best succeed with rural, self-sufficient farmers. He, along with most Democratic-Republicans, or Republicans, thought a strong central government would lead to oppression of the people living under the government. Hamilton favored a strong federal government. He believed without one, the economy could not flourish.…
- 755 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Jefferson and his followers felt that Hamilton’s financial schemes, including the suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion, were problematic for states’ rights. They felt that the states were being overshadowed by a federal colossus and so Jefferson and Madison organized their opposition to the Hamiltonian program, which…
- 336 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…
- 875 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamilton and Jefferson supported their party’s views. The Federalists wanted to remain neutral to avoid a sanction from Britain on American goods because they were highly concerned about paying off the national debt and ensure a strong economy by exporting manufactured goods. Conversely, Jeffersonian Republicans and his leader, an author of the Declaration of Independence, supported the motif of the French Revolution and believed that the Americans should support one similar to theirs.…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamilton spent his whole life career fighting the Jeffersonian people. He thought that the focal point of governing should be done by the federal government. The government and Jefferson’s ideals succeeded over Hamilton and the federalists. The government created the separation between powers and also passed the alien sedition acts of 1798. They were some of the…
- 312 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamiltonian Federalism- Alexander Hamilton wanted to form a strong union with the states and federal government. He sought an increase in the power/control of the federal government over the individual states. Hamilton also wanted a bank of the State so that loans could be put out to manufacturers and commercial enterprises. He felt like it was necessary to create a large national debt so that the government's credit would be built up over time. Finally, he wanted to place/raise tariffs on foreign goods to promote American manufacturing and the affordability of the products.…
- 248 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Whereas the Republicans argued that Jay’s treaty was too appeasing, yet the Senate still ratified it. Particularly, in the Election of 1796 when John Adams became president this weakened the Republicans even more. Adams upheld the Federalist pro-British foreign policy and supported Hamilton’s financial plans. As mentioned above, the Federalist attacks against the French Republic raised a great disturbance and protest among the people at home. The rivalry came to an enactment of coercive acts by the Federalists in order to limit the rights of the party system.…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some functions that parties perform are, they help elected leaders gather support and power. They’re stable coalitions that work between elections, as well as during them. Parties promote stability and act to moderate public opinion due to their pragmatic drive to win elections. Parties provide linkages among branches of government. They allow the often disparate parts of our political system to work together. Because parties must win national elections, they can also function as unifiers of the counter. They damper sectionalism and give people in remote parts of the country something in common with the…
- 2390 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
Political parties are key institutions at the heart of the political system. However, the claim that political parties are in decline puts forward the case that the significance of the party role is diminishing. It suggests that other institutions and processes are increasingly carrying out the functions of political parties, and that these alternatives are now dominating these roles and carrying them out more efficiently.…
- 623 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…
- 1211 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The UK's three major political parties are the Labour Party, the Conservative Party, and the Liberal Democrats, who won between them 616 out of the 646 seats available in the House of Commons at the 2005 general election. Most of the remaining seats were won by parties that only contest elections in one part of the UK such as the Scottish National Party (Scotland only), Plaid Cymru (Wales only), and the Democratic Unionist Party, Social Democratic and Labour Party, Ulster Unionist Party, and Sinn Féin (Northern Ireland only.…
- 401 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays