Preview

Political Parties Vs Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
866 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Parties Vs Federalists
During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area …show more content…
Any decision that had to be made, the Republicans believed they should use the Constitution as the authority to make the appropriate decision. If the Constitution did not delegate the power to the Federal government, Republicans thought that the States should have the authority. Jefferson stated this in the Kentucky resolution when he wrote, “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively or to the people”.
Freedom of speech was also an area of dispute. Freedom of speech came under attack in The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were written, many believed, to weaken the Republican party. This act consisted of four laws that were targeted at the Republicans’ power and ability to grow in numbers as well as grow in strength. The Naturalization Act made it more difficult for immigrants to become citizens by extending the timeline from five years to 14 years. During that time, most immigrants favored the Republican party, so this would hurt the growth of the party. The Alien Enemies Act allowed for male citizens of other nations during war to be deported or arrested, and the Alien Friends Act gave the president the right to deport immigrants that they suspected were spying or plotting against the government. The last law which was the Sedition Act was the law that limited the freedom of speech
…show more content…
They felt this was the best way to keep control. Republicans wanted the people to have the ultimate say. Republicans felt that the First National Bank was going to favor northern businesses as opposed to southern businesses. Jefferson wrote, “To make a thing which may be bought and sold, is not to prescribe regulations for buying and selling.” The First National Bank gave more power to the Federal government than the States. The control of the Federal government over the States continued to be evident in the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Kentucky Resolution pointed out the desire of Republicans to favor local government over Federal government when Jefferson stated, “the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP US DBQ

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson wrote to Gibeon Granger about the powers of the states. Jefferson believes the country is too large to have a single federal government. He believes that the states should have some power too. Jefferson says the Republicans have accepted these rights from the Constitution and the federalists have opposed them.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When the Federalist party was organized in 1791, those people who favored a strong central government and a loose constitutional interpretation coagulated and followed the ideals of men such as Alexander Hamilton. The first opposition political party in the United States was the Republican party, which held power, nationally, between 1801 and 1825. Those who were in favor of states rights and a strict construction of the constitution fell under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson. These Jeffersonian republicans, also known as anti-federalists, believed in strict adherence to the writings of the constitution. They wanted state's rights and individual rights, which they believed could only be granted under strict construction of the constitution. Thomas Jefferson, the third president, and James Madison, his successor, were close friends and lifelong political associates. Long regarded as advocates for liberty, Jefferson and Madison believed in the principles of government and sought to restore the spirit of the revolution of 1776. These republicans spoke out against anti-monarchial attitudes and opposed the aristocratic and elitist attitudes of the federalists (Peterson, 1975). A weaker central government by the people was the goal of the republican party. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were two presidents who believed in the theory of the republican party, but due to circumstances within the parties and the increasing conflicts between Britain and France abroad, they found it increasingly difficult to act in a manner which coincided with their republican beliefs and at times had to reconcile their actions.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They are multiple between federalist and Democratic-Republicans. They are Differences Between the First Political Parties. Some of the differences between federalist and Democratic-Republicans is that federalist leader is Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans leader is Thomas Jefferson. The federalist has an alliance with British and the Democratic-Republicans has an alliance with French. Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson always disagreed on many things.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, the Republicans changed their perspectives once facing certain political, foreign and religious problems and this caused a change concerning their strict interpretation of the Constitution. Republicans, who did not accept the Elastic Clause, started making use of it. For example, the Louisiana purchase was thought to be unconstitutional but president Thomas Jefferson argued that it was a very beneficial territory, making this his argument for the government to come and accept it. The people lost their right of protection during the republican presidency because they made use of the…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jefferson's resolution for Kentucky, he went even further by declaring that ultimate sovereignty rested with the states, which empowered them to reject federal laws to which they objected. He stated, "To their resolutions passed at the last session, respecting certain unconstitutional laws of Congress, commonly called the alien and sedition laws, would be faithless indeed to themselves, and to those they represent,…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History DBQ

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Federalist and Dem-Reps parties constantly used to debate their views of government. The Dem-Reps were argued against Federalists beliefs that were unconstitutional as shown in Document D , Thomas Jefferson stated the Federalist National Bank unconstitutional and Document C James Madison (Jefferson’s Dem-Rep assistant) the “Virginia Resolutions” ruled that limited liberties was unconstitutional. Thomas Jefferson though a Dem-Rep constantly contradicted his own views with his various actions when he felt they were necessary .Although Dem-Reps had a strict interpretation of the constitution it neared toward a loose interpretation during from Jefferson and Madison’s actions , these actions included attacking the Barbary Pirates, the Embargo Act , and the Louisiana Purchases.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions were written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They declared the Sedition Act to be in violation of the First and Tenth Amendments. These resolutions stated that the states had the right to deem any law passed by congress unconstitutional if it violated the Bill of Rights. They argued that the Constitution was an agreement between the states so the government had no right to exercise powers not delegated to it and if they did then the states had the right to void them. In other words, the states…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson and Madison DBQ

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Jefferson first took office he took a strong stand against the ideas and beliefs of the Federalist Party. Jefferson alleged that the nation “can never be harmonious and solid while so respectable a portion of its citizens support principles which go directly to a change of the federal Constitution” (Doc. A). Jefferson initially viewed the use loose interpretation of the Constitution to make laws and policies, as a direct challenge to state power which the Democratic - Republican Party so strongly believed in . He believed that Federalists were wrong in their way of interpreting the Constitution and that they were trying to “sink the state governments, consolidate them into one, and to monarchies that” (Doc. A). Jefferson believed that the “country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government…” (Doc. A) And feared that with too much power a monarchy could soon consume the United States again. Jackson believed that with loose interpretation of the constitution things such as even religion could be controlled by the government. Jackson stated that “no power to…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That was, that both sides were loyal to the constitution and both sides respected it. One party may have viewed things differently than the other, but for the most part both sides applied it to their lives. Jefferson points out, “We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists” (Jefferson). He praises the government and says that he believes we have the best and strongest government of anyone and that this…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back when George Washington was first elected president, there were no political parties. Soon after, in 1796, the Federalist party, founded by Alexander Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republican party, founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were formed. The point of these parties was to form alliances with those who share the same beliefs as you. If you wanted something done with the country, you needed some help, and joining a political party is just the way to get it. Though the two parties were created for the same purposes, they both had many different political views.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two political parties in the United States of America and those two political parties are , federalist and Anti-Federalist. Both of these political parties were made in the 1600’s , which was a very long time ago. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist both have separate opinions about things ,so they dont always agree. In fact ,ever…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alien And Sedition Acts

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alien and Sedition Acts- During the presidency of Adams he decided to pass the Alien and Sedition Acts in the year of 1798. These new Alien set of laws, three in total, made situations worse in the United States by controlling immigration more and giving more power to the president. With this power, the president could throw anyone out of the country thought to be a risk to the United States or even by sharing certain political ideas. The Sedition Law allowed authorities to fine and even imprison people thought to be plotting against the United States. The president thought these acts would help with the security of America, but many citizens thought the laws were prohibiting their choice of speech in which case there were rebellions. This…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thought was that the federal government had a few enumerated powers that it could not exceed (absent amendment) whereas the states can do as they see fit to ensure the safety and welfare of their residents. For example, states can pass laws criminalizing a wide range of conduct such as murder, burglary, rape, robbery, etc. The federal government is limited in its authority to proscribe states are often called (by both courts and politicians) laboratories of democracy. The same basic issues exist is basically every state; how to keep people safe, how to make sure people safe, how to make sure people get needed medical care, how to improve education. While many states may approach the same issue in the same manner, other states may adopt novel approaches. For example, Massachusetts and Utah both tackles healthcare reform, Louisiana is using state money to send kids from bad schools to private schools, and other states have legalized medicinal and/or recreational marijuana. If something has a positive effect on quality of life issues, it is often adopted by money other states, and perhaps nationwide.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays