Preview

Political Science Research Paper

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Political Science Research Paper
Ajmal Kasab was sentenced to death after the very evident 26/11 terrorist attack in Mumbai, he was guilty for a total of 80 offences which included murder, waging war against the country, being in possession of explosives and other charges. His death sentence was signed after verifying all the evidences of the crime [1]. On similar count Afzal guru was hanged for playing a pivotal role in the 2001 Parliament attacks, providing a hideout and transport. The difference between the two hangings was the role politics, evidence and transparency played.

The Indian government has still allowed capital punishment only for the rare and the serious offences. But since 1995, death sentence has been issued only 4 times which shows the considerable reduce in these hangings. The official data collected by the government statistics say that only 52 people have been executed since 1947 whereas the research conducted by the People’s Union of civil liberties proves otherwise.

The number of death sentences in the country when taken in relation with the total population of the country happens to be a very minute number. Even then 77 defendants were sentenced to death in the year 2005, and according to the Prison statistics of India there were 273 convicts which included 6 females were under death sentence by the end of 2005. Only one person was executed in 2004, the first that happened since 1997 but none in 2005 and 2006[2] .The last death penalties were issued on February 8, 2013 and November 21, 2012 executing Mohammad Afzal Guru and Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab respectively [3] .

The entire theme of the of the research paper is to understand and notice the use of Capital punishments in India and how certain section of the society is affected by it? How politics does play a role in death sentences? The history of Capital Punishments in India, the clemency pleas, the hanging of Afzal Guru and his role in the Parliament attack of 2001, why should there be capital punishment in our



Citations: 1. "Ticket to paradise in a brutal world". November 22, 2012. Retrieved November 22, 2012. 20. (February 9, 2013). "Afzal Guru hanging: voice of affirmation across political spectrum". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 21 22. A Political Hanging: Nirmalangshu Mukherji .MARCH 18, 2013 by Shuddhabrata Sengupta. 23

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    b) Both grow at the same rate, but for diff reasons: Rich dictatorships repress labor/grow through capital investment. Rich democracies pay labor more/grow through innovation.…

    • 4257 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is something that has been debated over by the public for ages whether if it is impartial to take away another human’s life. For politicians it’s a way to extract dangerous criminals, but is it appropriate to take another human life due to a crime? “A Hanging” by George Orwell presents the perspective of a guard ordered to take a prisoner to the gallows for hanging as a result of an unknown crime. Throughout the essay Orwell uses symbolism of life and death to convey his animosity towards the capital punishment through the perspective of a guard in Burma during British Imperialism. “A Hanging” a hanging by George Orwell uses examples of life and death to assert Orwell’s distain towards capital punishment before the hanging of the prisoner, at the gallows, and after the hanging.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Science Midterm

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If Jefferson and Hamilton could return to the US today, who would be happier with the way the country has turned out and why? Also, what political party would they join and why?…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bern Death Penalty

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment is a punitive measure in which an offender is found guilty through the traditional judicial process and the punishment delivered is execution. Depending on the state the offender was processed in, execution may be delivered in many ways ranging from lethal injection to death by electrocution. Crimes for which capital punishment is applicable for are known as capital crimes. Since capital punishment is essentially about the use of the death penalty, it must be asked whether it is a rational and effective way to react to and address capital the crimes. This writing will explore both the moral and practical implications of capital punishment and also look at it from an ethical viewpoint.…

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think this a big topic to say about hanging- I feel it good to give a person such kind of punishment. It helps in thinking about the person why he was given the punishment of hanging. It makes people to realize what going to happen if some make a mistake in the society. Let me speak about some thing that happened in my country 11/26 attacks in Mumbai, India. In this incident a person who attacked and killed many people and the government finally after seeing many consideration from both view and given him the punishment of hanging. I feel that’s a wise decision taken by the government to hang a person who killed many innocents. By this it states that to the people if some on who make a mistake like this; they are going to punish by the hanging. I think in this kind it will make a person in committing such kind of mistake in future.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Approximately thirty-five years ago, only 16 countries had abolished the death penalty (“Death Penalty” 1). Today, the number stands at 104 (“Death Penalty” 1). The countries that do still have laws on capital punishment are abolitionists in practice, meaning that they have not executed anyone in over 10 years (“Death Penalty” 1). Every year, executions only take part in a few countries, and the United States is one of them. America is the only major western country that still executes its prisoners. From 2007-2011, the United States carried out 220 executions (“Death Penalty” 1). In fact, the frequency of executions in the United States is only matched by five other countries: China, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and North Korea (“Death Penalty”…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why would we kill people who kill people to show that killing remains wrong? Often times in the justice system, a suspect with a heavy crime brought against them, have a high chance of getting sentenced to the death penalty. Although many times the verdict comes back correct, what about the lives of the innocents? Their life became limited once they got wrongfully convicted. Throughout this paper I will explain why capital punishment should not remain an option in the justice law system with first, explaining how sometimes innocent peoples verdict can result in the sentencing to death; second, the wrong message the death penalty sends to society; and third, a solution. In essence, the death penalty prove to have a high risk taking innocent lives.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Valbhav Goel, explores the issue of capital punishment through the lens of human rights law and a sociological context. Goel goes on to examine the very nature of capital punishment and explores the barbaric and unethical component attached to the practice. He does so while incorporating the debate of proponents and critics of the death penalty and also looks at trends developing in the past decade in terms of utilization of the death penalty. Goel also explores famous uses of the death penalty such as the Sadaam Hussein execution and whether certain individuals merit the use of capital punishment. This paper can help me establish trends taking place on a global scale with regards to capital punishment while also exploring the legal analysis of the issue of capital punishment and whether it contravenes human rights law as well as international law.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1976, when the Death Penalty was reinstated by the U.S. Supreme Court, 1,394 people have been executed [As of December 2014] (Fins). The Death Penalty also recognized as Capital Punishment is an immensely controversial problem in the United States. Although some criminal’s acts are unforgivable, all lives are sacred and nobody gets to decide who lives or dies. Americans should be against capital punishment because it claims innocent lives, it’s expensive, and it’s arbitrary.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Honor Killing

    • 3289 Words
    • 14 Pages

    In March 2010, a Karnal district court ordered the execution of the five perpetrators in this case, the first time a court in India has ordered justice be served in an honour killing case. The court gave life sentence to the khap head who ordered the killings but did not participate, while the driver in the kidnapping was sentenced to seven years.…

    • 3289 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum 101

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This article basically talks about extra judicial killing which is not acceptable in a society. Though it is reduce crime, but ethically it is not a proper judgment. Only because of that Most of the people are becoming safe and happy. In 1972, the paramilitary group Jatiya RakkhiBahini came into force and had become renowned for its extra judicial executions. Now Rapid Action battalion (RAB) started such are killings again and introduced new terms of crossfire which is not totally acceptable in a society.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice or Revenge

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ndia’s first execution of a death penalty in eight years, the speed with which Ajmal Kasab (the only perpetrator of the 26 November 2008 killings to have been held) was hanged after his mercy petition was rejected by the president, the public celebrations that erupted in a few parts of the country and the manner in which the media has reported/commented on the hanging in Pune on 21 November must force us to ask ourselves: Are we a society that seeks justice or prefers to lust for revenge? Kasab’s action four years ago on the night of 26 November was no ordinary crime. He was a volunteer in a plan to show India’s state and society that a small group could inflict largescale violence and wreak massive human tragedy in public places. Kasab himself was part of the two-member team that caused the largest number of deaths and injuries that terrible night, mowing down dozens of innocents on the concourse of Mumbai’s main railway station. The cold-blooded murders that Kasab committed may qualify for the Supreme Court’s “rarest of rare cases” criterion under which capital punishment could be handed down. Yet, has justice been served in the Mumbai killings by the hanging of Kasab? Is justice in general served by the death penalty? The full extent of the planning and execution of the Mumbai crimes is yet to come to light and the masterminds who recruited the foot soldiers remain free. There will be no closure with the death of Kasab and there can be no end to the grief of the hundreds of families who suffered that night. EPW has consistently argued against the continuation of the provision for capital punishment on India’s statute books (most recently the editorials on 15 May 2010 and 3 September 2011). The arguments against the death penalty are well known. First, the right to life of all citizens is inalienable and cannot be taken away by anyone, not even the state,…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays