Politicians Should Show Us Productivity Improvement Case Study
Episode 514: Politicians should Show Us "Productivity Improvement" Practically!
Work-life balance of politicians and bureaucrats </ h3>
As in other developed countries, Japan is also facing the limits of existing "welfare state line".
In other words, every political parties agree on the basic policy of "streamlining the administration" (simple and efficient government). Cannot go against the flow of the times.
* Through the chain of bankruptcies that occurred in the 1930s (the Great Depression), human beings denied "laissez-faireism" and affirmed "social security" by a big government. After the economic stagnation (Oil crisis) that occurred in the 1970s, human beings to be aware of "inefficiency of welfare state" and accepted a recurrence …show more content…
The direction of reforms to be discussed is diverse, for example, 1) to stop "Hanko administration", 2) to promote the "privatization of special purpose entities", and 3) to unify collection of health insurance, pensions and income taxes". However in any direction it seems that it is not easy to form an agreement on "how to make it smaller" or "the procedure to shrink" the government that has grown big.
As a result, the Diet members repeat similar questions and the Cabinet repeats the same answers.
"Questions" are submitted at midnight, "Responses" are created in the middle of the night, "briefing to Minister " is held early in the morning. The National Assembly itself is promoting 'enlargement of administration'. "Productivity improvement" they say is already a nonsense.
How to make question by Diet members
In the first place, the work of Diet members is not "performing in the galleries" to be looking good on TV. To the private sector, the committee deliberations seem merely 'long-term meeting' which detain people who are paid high hourly wage like the Minister from 9 o'clock in the morning to late evening. What do the investors think if the "Board of Directors" was held from morning till evening, and ended up with some of the directors "appealing to leave …show more content…
I am very fond of that to set the banner of overtime reduction / telework promotion, and put it into practice. But yet, we need to discuss "That is fine. But aren't there more points to be improved?" That is because, changing "workers" or "workplace" alone will not lead to drastic productivity gains.
If I dare to suggest the "reforming policy", the policy would be "committee time is up to 2 hours in the morning / 2 hours in the afternoon at the most in a day".
And by designing the Business Processes based on that policy, we aim at labor saving and "productivity improvement". Politicians and a bureaucrats who are good at studying could realize "9 to 5" (9: 00 - 17: 00) and show a model of productivity improvement to the people.
It is too late when someone concerning in the National Diet has committed "overwork-induced
Work-life balance of politicians and bureaucrats </ h3>
As in other developed countries, Japan is also facing the limits of existing "welfare state line".
In other words, every political parties agree on the basic policy of "streamlining the administration" (simple and efficient government). Cannot go against the flow of the times.
* Through the chain of bankruptcies that occurred in the 1930s (the Great Depression), human beings denied "laissez-faireism" and affirmed "social security" by a big government. After the economic stagnation (Oil crisis) that occurred in the 1970s, human beings to be aware of "inefficiency of welfare state" and accepted a recurrence …show more content…
The direction of reforms to be discussed is diverse, for example, 1) to stop "Hanko administration", 2) to promote the "privatization of special purpose entities", and 3) to unify collection of health insurance, pensions and income taxes". However in any direction it seems that it is not easy to form an agreement on "how to make it smaller" or "the procedure to shrink" the government that has grown big.
As a result, the Diet members repeat similar questions and the Cabinet repeats the same answers.
"Questions" are submitted at midnight, "Responses" are created in the middle of the night, "briefing to Minister " is held early in the morning. The National Assembly itself is promoting 'enlargement of administration'. "Productivity improvement" they say is already a nonsense.
How to make question by Diet members
In the first place, the work of Diet members is not "performing in the galleries" to be looking good on TV. To the private sector, the committee deliberations seem merely 'long-term meeting' which detain people who are paid high hourly wage like the Minister from 9 o'clock in the morning to late evening. What do the investors think if the "Board of Directors" was held from morning till evening, and ended up with some of the directors "appealing to leave …show more content…
I am very fond of that to set the banner of overtime reduction / telework promotion, and put it into practice. But yet, we need to discuss "That is fine. But aren't there more points to be improved?" That is because, changing "workers" or "workplace" alone will not lead to drastic productivity gains.
If I dare to suggest the "reforming policy", the policy would be "committee time is up to 2 hours in the morning / 2 hours in the afternoon at the most in a day".
And by designing the Business Processes based on that policy, we aim at labor saving and "productivity improvement". Politicians and a bureaucrats who are good at studying could realize "9 to 5" (9: 00 - 17: 00) and show a model of productivity improvement to the people.
It is too late when someone concerning in the National Diet has committed "overwork-induced