Given the fact that there are recent evidences to support that if the company’s emission level stays the same, the fish in the lakes and rivers in the area might soon be unsafe for human consumption, it is only the right thing to consider and do install the necessary technology. This is in the interest of not only of the environment but of the ultimate benefactor of the environment which is the human beings. The motive here can be simply considered as a form of psychological altruism in which we value benevolence or kindness towards others. In the perspective of a company, it can be considered a form of being socially responsible. This can also be viewed under the principle of duties, specifically duties to others. The others refer to the environment and the human beings. Even if the factory’s emission is within the legal limits levels, given the fact that new evidence are coming and knowing that the government is always lagging behind scientific evidences, the motivating to do is to install the new technology.
However, it can be argued as well in the perspective of self preservation. The company fears that backed by public opinion the company maybe force to not only install the new technology but also requires monthly emission level reports which is much expensive and time consuming.
What motives would the company have to delay installing the new technology?
As stated the company’s environmental compliance budget is tight. The company needs to show profit for the year if it has to survive with stocks and investors confidence. The motive that can be argued or considered here would be on the basis of duty to oneself, for self propagation and interest. Psychological egoism can also be argued here. It can be discoursed that in the interest of the factory’s workforce or personnel, to remain able to provide job, tax and overall to the “in-line” benefactor (e.g. worker’s family, the government) the company has to survive and thus should be able to show profit for the year instead of consuming it towards installing a new technology. The fact that the government has not yet imposed a new regulation and the company is legally following the government requirement on its emission it can be considered as doing its responsibility and that installing the new technology is irrational and can be argued as unethical which is tantamount to self destruction. Self preservation is important for the company.
Why might companies in this region prefer for the government to impose new regulations?
There are a few things to think along this line; one is that the companies would want to show to their clients and investors that the reason they might not be posting profit is that because they are socially responsible, installing expensive and time consuming new technologies for the benefit of the environment. This may encourage more investors especially those which possess and highly respects social altruism. This might come up if the government had been quite up to date in its environmental regulations.
The second thought however, would be that for their own benefit and posting of profit for the year, the companies would prefer the government to give the go signal since the government is always delayed in its environmental policies and regulations. Therefore, the companies would benefit from the time delay of the installation of the expensive new technologies. This is along lines of self preservation and interest.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Polluter Corp, has recently spent $3 million to purchase emission allowances, with a vintage year of 2012, in order to meet the need for additional EAs in the fiscal years 2010-2014. They will also need to sell EAs, with a vintage year of 2016, in order to offset the costs of the purchase. It is to my understanding that the need for EAs arose because of the significant amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the Company 's antiquated manufacturing facilities. In order to remedy this situation, plans were made to upgrade the facilities in 2014. The reduced gas emissions that the upgraded facilities are expected to provide will render EAs with vintage years beyond 2014, useless, as they would no longer be needed to meet the gas emission standards. Consequently, the Company took action as explained above.…
- 1435 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
* At the end of a compliance period, Polluter Corp. must provide sufficient EAs to the government or pay a fine.…
- 596 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One issue with the company is the significant amount of greenhouse gases emitted. Polluter Corp. is an antiquated manufacturing facility that produces gas and has plans to decrease the greenhouse gas emissions to a lower level by 2014. The company believes they will need additional EAs to upgrade but with the decrease in gas emissions this will create excess EAs. The company plans to meet its need…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the proposed “Option 2”, the ethical issue is the plant’s continued emission of waste products into the river. Here “Theory of Relative Development” is particularly useful. Since Malaysia is a developing country, it may not seem fair to apply the same environmental standards that are applicable to developed countries like US. One may argue that, in such developing countries, human survival is the immediate concern than the long-term effects on the environment. However the same theory also makes us think about the global consequences of this local action. Further, Deontological theories (specifically Kant’s categorical imperative) challenge’s us to reason “What if everybody acted this way?”. If every company makes the same excuse, then its global…
- 933 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Polluter Corp. is a company that operates three plants in the United States. They make different cleaning products which are sold to customers. The U.S. government sells or gives out emissions allowances to companies, including Polluter Corp., which determines a set amount of pollutants and greenhouse gases a company can let into the environment. These are given out to help discourage pollution by companies. “EA’s” are assigned a year that a company can use in, and they also can be bought and/or swapped with other EA’s from different companies, as long as the swapped EA’s have the same usage year. When the usage year for the EA is over, they are returned to the government. If the company emits more pollution that the allowed amount on the EA, then the company will pay a fine. Polluter has recorded their EA’s as intangible assets.…
- 644 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Polluter Corp. is a company that operates three manufacturing facilities and produces household cleaning products in the United States. The U.S. government grants this company with emission allowances (EAs) that can be used during 2010 to 2030. According to The Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions (FERC), Polluter Corporation records emission allowances as elusive assets with a cost basis of zero. The fiscal year is December 31.…
- 1051 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
And also and ethical problem in this case is “Would it be ethical, when company good willingness of environmental enforcement by policies initiation compromised by the interest of financial issues and local situations?” The intention of EITs requirements compromise came from MearlCan. MearlCan see that EITs implementation will costly, and unnecessary due to existed standard which already…
- 440 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2) What keeps other companies from having the commitment to environmental sustainability that NBB has evidenced?…
- 317 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Students can print this template prior to viewing the online Video Lesson. These are the same questions found online! You only need to watch each video and select the best of the multiple choice options you feel best answer each question.…
- 1015 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
After several deaths in a small town, a local Tannery is suspected of somehow poisoning the water supply from illegally dumping out toxic waste. The Tannery and another company were later found guilty of dumping toxic waste and were fined for their actions and forced to clean up the toxic materials and restore the land they destroyed. Unfortunately, the dumping that occurred there was not the first case of illegally dumping toxic waste and it probably will not be the last. And, who knows how many countless others, that happened many years ago, are yet to be discovered. One of the biggest reasons that companies continue to illegally dump waste is that it is simply too expensive to dispose of it properly. The cost of proper disposing of the material outweigh the benefits of not. So, in other words, it decreases profits. Another thing to point out here is that even if a company gets caught, it is still less expensive to pay a fine or get a settlement agreement, than to dispose of the waste properly. The article, “The Problem of Social Cost”, addresses this issue. It says that you can regulate these companies by decreasing the amount they produce. This can be accomplished by increasing the social cost, which will lessen the demand for products that produce pollution. This in turn will assist companies in ensuring that marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost. Other…
- 891 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The key aspects of the role of a teaching assistant are to help raise educational standards in the classroom by providing support for the pupils, the teacher and the school. They must also promote a quality learning environment and contribute to making a positive, quality and effective classroom environment. Which in turn shall maximise learning, minimise behavioural problems and help to create a safe and positive environment.…
- 1834 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
(4.) Explain why it is in the best interest of industry to pollute rather than operate in a…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The costs are not greater than or equal to the benefits, thus offsetting any benefit from installing the equipment and the pollution reduction. In order to determine whether or not the cost of installing the capital equipment outweighs the benefits of the equipment, one must fix the level of pollution reduction and determine the optimal level of pollution reduction. According to our text, “the optimal level of the activity—the level that maximizes net benefit—is…
- 1330 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
After reading Jimmy Carter 's essay on assault weapons, I have come to an agreement with his position that the government should reinstate a ban on assault weapons. Americans do not need to be in possession of semiautomatic assault weapons like AK-47, AR-15,and Uzis. There is rarely a necessity for the average American to even use or own them.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Business today has so many responsibilities. Aside from making a profit, they are forced to take on a different responsibility, one that involves the environment. Even though, they already have many regulations set by the government, they are still being asked to answer to the call of helping out the rest of society take of nature. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of corporate responsibility for the environment through the agent-of-society and agent-of-capital views.…
- 1470 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays