Preview

pooop

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
pooop
poooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- ooooooooooooooooooooooop poop poooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- ooooooooooooooooooooooop poop poop oppppppo dfjdfjkdv hgfkjhk gfkfgjfkf poooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooop pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- ooooooooooooooooooooooop poopAbout 827,000,000 results (0.88 seconds)
Search Results

Wikipedia www.wikipedia.org/‎ العربية • Български • Català • Česky • Dansk • Eesti • Esperanto • Euskara • فارسی • Galego • 한국어 • हिन्दी • Hrvatski • Bahasa Indonesia • עברית • Lietuvių ... Wikipedia Deaths in 2013 - Portal:Current events - Wikipedia - History - ... Simple English Wikipedia Search the 104,775 articles in the Simple English Wikipedia · How ... Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia‎ Editing. In a departure from the style of traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia is open to outside editing. This means that, with the exception of particularly ... ‎Jimmy Wales - ‎Collaborative editing - ‎Larry Sanger - ‎Wikimedia Foundation Wiki - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki‎ A wiki is usually a web application which allows people to add, modify, or delete content in a collaboration with others. Text is usually written using a simplified ... Wikipedia:About - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About‎ English Wikipedia right now.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of John Seigenthaler's Essay
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of John Seigenthaler's Essay

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sock Monkey Analysis
    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sock Monkey Analysis

    My initial plan was to remove the advertisement-like tone that was flagged by a Wikipedia user. I assumed they thought that since most of the information was cited from the same book, that it therefor gave the impression that the book was being advertised. I also wanted to change the introduction because I didn’t think that a simple definition was enough. I viewed having only two sentences was too plain. I also wanted to add and reorganize information in the origins and Sock Monkeys Today section for a more informative and logical flow. One specific piece of information I wanted to add was Tony Millionaires comic book since it has its own Wikipedia page and I wanted to be able to hyperlink it to that page. I also intended to research different pieces of literature or movies sock monkeys make an appearance in. The third section of Wikipedia was the Sock Monkey Festival. When I first made my editing plan, I didn’t think the festival was important because there was not enough information that would indicate significance and there were also no citations. I also hoped to add a picture on the Wikipedia page even though there was already a picture on the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Apa Research and Bibliography Activity Essay Example

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 2 Research Paper Assignment
    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unit 2 Research Paper Assignment

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531
    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ldr/531

    Wikipedia is a virtual library that offers its readers a diverse range of information from articles, books, dictionary, references, thesaurus, timelines, and current events.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Philip Lau's Essay The Limitations Of Wikipedia
    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Philip Lau's Essay The Limitations Of Wikipedia

    Thirdly, the writer explains how as a result of anyone being able to modify a post on Wikipedia, the chances of the user modifying his or her bias opinion is immensely high. The essayist also provides a definition of opinion making it clear to the reader that Wikipedia posts tend to be one-sided. Furthermore, Philip adds Wikipedia’s quote warning users “not to believe everything they read including the information on Wikipedia”. Philip then illustrates how political figures and subjects like abortion are slandered and vandalized on Wikipedia, making it harder for a student to find useful…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Inf 103

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales
    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jimmy wales

    Main point A: Wikipedia was only a simple dream of Jimmy Wales, to build a “growing-content” encyclopedia. (Jimmy Wales, n.d.)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Attachment in Children with Asd
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Attachment in Children with Asd

    Rector, Lucy Holman. (2008). Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 22. Retrieved December 19, 2010, from the World Wide Web:…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Wikipedia
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Wikipedia

    Wikipedia does not have an apocalyptic view about this because its core audience knows the site very well and it has all the necessary experience to get exactly what they want. The loyal users use internal searches or they head directly to the page they want to see. This somehow works like in the case of the top affiliate networks. People know what they want and where they should go to find it.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia
    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Credible Source of Information
    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Credible Source of Information

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Wikipedia A Valid Academic Source?
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is Wikipedia A Valid Academic Source?

    So what does that mean to the academic student? Who is this community? According to the Wikipedia website, anyone can contribute and make changes to “almost every page” in their site (Wikipedia: Introduction, 2014). Let us look at this a little closely as see how valid the information in Wikipedia is.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia Is Not A Reliable Source
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wikipedia Is Not A Reliable Source

    This small excerpt from Wikipedia’s disclaimer page shows that it recognizes its own unreliability. Using Wikipedia as a source is like taking advice on writing papers from someone who says they don’t know much about writing papers. When using information from a source it must be relevant. Relevant meaning that the information given must relate to the topic. Wikipedia also holds itself to the standard of relevance (Relevance), but sometimes the editors can go off on tangents and the information becomes less related to the topic and more obscure.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Blue Ocean Strategy Analysis of Wikipedia
    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Blue Ocean Strategy Analysis of Wikipedia

    The value proposition offered by Wikipedia was markedly different from that being currently offered by the online encyclopaedias (dominated by www.brittanica.com). Wikipedia added a missing component of people participation into the scheme of things. They realized that the main use of the encyclopaedia was to gain quick and easy-to access information on a particular topic. The costs that went into copyright and into proofreading…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics