Preview

Popper Torture And Refutation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1088 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Popper Torture And Refutation
PHL250 Introduction To Philosophy of Science
Chapter 4 Review: Popper, Conjecture and Refutation
Felix Walpole: 998737256 - TA: Greg Lusk
February 13th 2012
Karl Popper presents a way of perceiving science that is appealing for a number of reasons, he argued a few simple and outstanding claims with which he attempted to revolutionize the way we see and practice science. In the chapter, Popper, Conjecture and Refutation, Goddfrey communicates the basic ideas that set Popper apart from other philosophers of science, and explains how his theories are still important half a century after their conception. I will first outline the components of Poppers theory, and then continue to summarize the known objections to his theories. It will then
…show more content…

Although Popper was not a logical positivist, he did communicate and disagree with them. Popper’s initial goal was to ‘understand science;’ he began to develop a system with which to distinguish science from ‘non-science’ or ‘pseudo-science’. Popper coined this obstacle ‘the problem of demarcation. He attempted to deal with this problem by proposing a solution which he entitled ‘falsificationism,’ which claimed that ‘a hypothesis is scientific if and only if it has the potential to be refuted by some possible observation.’ Popper’s whole conception of how science should be understood and practiced was centered around the belief that when investigating a scientific theory, we should never increase our confidence in the truth of a theory as it has simply not yet been proven wrong. Popper maintained that we should never assume one theory to be closer to the truth than another as it is impossible to ever prove a theory, and in this sense we should approach scientific theories tentatively. Upon this framework of understanding, Popper attempted to build a practical way of pursuing science. He proposed a system of perceiving scientific change that involved a simple two-step cycle: First, conjecture, the proposition of new theories; the best of which are bold and striking. Secondly, attempted refutation which if succeeds draws us back to conjecture. Popper believed that this was a practical and physical way of dealing with science which should naturally evolve and push us towards developing new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alan Chalmers, a British-Australian philosopher of science and best-selling author, suggests a common view of science by which scientific knowledge is ‘reliable’ and ‘objectively proven’ knowledge that is derived from facts of experience, experimental procedure and observations. This essay aims to discuss the problems that are likely to be highlighted by a Popperian hypothetico-deductivist when confronted with Chalmers’ adverse views on the validity of the scientific method. Both Alan Chalmers and Karl Popper - renowned for the development of hypothetico-deductivist/falsificationist account of science - represent the two major, contradictory theories (falsification and induction) regarding the functionality of science. I will be structuring my argument around these two models and the several complications surrounding the inductivist’s account of science that are seemingly solved by Popper’s alternative.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his paper, “Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and Aim-Oriented Empiricism,” Nicholas Maxwell proposes the latest version of his conception of natural science, which he calls aim-oriented empiricism (AOE). Maxwell states that AOE “is a kind of synthesis of the views of Popper, Kuhn, and Lakatos, but is also an improvement over the views of all three.”(181) It is Maxwell’s conception of aim-oriented empiricism (hereafter referred to as AOE) that this paper is addressed to. There are two central reasons for Maxwell’s conception of AOE. First is his claim that physics has an implicit, persistent assumption about the universe, “that the universe is such that no seriously disunified, ad hoc theory is true.” (181) Second is Maxwell’s assertion that “the assumption is pure conjecture, substantial and influential but bereft of any kind of justification.” (182) One of the problems that Maxwell states that his conception of AOE is designed to solve is ”how can rival versions of the assumption be rationally assessed, so that what is accepted by physics can be improved.” (182) The rational for the conception of AOE is predicated on the assertion that there is no justification for the current assumption that theories should be unified and universal, “and thus (the assumption is) all too likely to be false.” (182) I will argue that there is justification for the assumption that theories should be unified and universal rather than disunified and ad hoc.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Influenza

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Geosci Motherload

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In looking at a painting, we can ask different people what they think, or we can make up our own mind on whether we like it or not, and that is perfectly valid. In science, we have to ask: does the idea fit with the way the world works? Can I predict the speed of a falling object better using Newton's ideas or Aristotle's? As it turns out, Aristotle’s ideas didn’t predict things very well, and Newton’s did.…

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As one sociologist Popper argues that science is a open belief system where every scientist’s theory can be falsified, as science can be open to criticism and tested by others. For example if scientist argues water boils at 100 degrees Celsius this can be tested (falsified). However with religion this is impossible as you are unable to test religious ideas on what happens after death. This leads to religion not being falsified and science ruled by the theory of falsification. Thus leading to Popper to believe science has been successful in explaining and controlling the world becoming the main ideological influence in society today.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main theoretical points in his paper are the six commonly used criticisms of the scientific basis of psychology and his rebuttals. The first one, “Psychology is Merely Common Sense” says just that. That everything in psychology is a commonly known fact amongst the…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mach began to develop a following for his way of thinking ([3] 87). While some people followed Mach’s philosophy, his philosophy was flawed ([3] 172). The flaw is that if science…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Multiverse

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The multiverse (or meta-universe, metaverse) is the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including the historical universe we consistently experience) that together comprise everything that exists: the entirety of space, time, matter, and energy as well as the physical laws and constants that describe them. The term was coined in 1895 by the American philosopher and psychologist William James.[1] The various universes within the multiverse are sometimes called parallel universes.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Popper

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "The greatest disease in the West today is not Tuberculosis or leprosy; it is being unwanted, unloved, and uncared for. We can cure physical diseases with medicine, but the only cure for loneliness, despair, and hopelessness is love." This quote, spoken by Mother Teresa, describes why I aspire to be a nurse. The technology and medicine we have in the world today is extremely advanced. However, this advanced technology and medicine would be worthless without the compassion and quality care given by trained nurses.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ereditato’s priority was towards the advancement of the scientific community, rather than personal gain from this potential discovery. The fact that Ereditato increased the scope of his scientific observation to find this error furthers Popper’s concept of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socratic dialogue

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For the first question brought up about, if Feynman’s idea about science was a widely excepted idea at the time, I found out that it was not widely agreed upon. Although at the time Feynman wrote about this his idea was becoming more popular, and today it is now commonly accepted. It is interesting to know that during the time this article was written it was kind of seen as a radicle idea and not containing much logic.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reflexivity

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Popper (1957) was the first to establish a different perception of the concept of reflexivity based on a scientific approach; as a result this produced the definition of what we know as the 'Oedipal effect'. This theory then inspired others such as Flanagan (1981) and Nagel (1961) to explore it concept in greater depth, demonstrating the problems that occur by scientifically analysing reflexivity as a science. They argued that reflexivity complicates all three of the traditional roles that are typically played by a classical science in terms of the explanation, predication and control, as if a prediction can lead to changes in the system that the prediction is made in relation to, it then challenges the possibilities to assess scientific hypotheses by making comparisons with the predictions they entail with and the events that actually occur.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays