Preview

position of English law in the Malay states and its effect to the local law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
674 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
position of English law in the Malay states and its effect to the local law
While, as for the reception of English law in the Malay states, RJ Wilkinson said : ‘There can be no doubt that Moslem Law would have ended by becoming the law of Malaya had not British law stepped in to check it’. Before the British intervention into Malay states, Malays were governed by Malay adat law and for the non-Malays, they were governed by personal laws or if they were British subjects, English law. These laws continued to apply, subject to modifications made by specific legislation, until the formal reception of the English law.

British started to intervene into Malay states using series of concluded treaties with Malay Rulers, in return for British protection against external attack, agreed to accept British advisers whose advice had to be sought and acted upon in all matters except those concerning Islam and Malay custom. It can be seen that through the so-called Residential System, British imposed indirect rule over the Malay states.

The formation of the Federated Malay States (FMS) showed that the Malay Rulers seems started to accept the British intervention into Malay states. Reception of English law into FMS can be divided into informal and formal reception. English law was introduced informally through the Residential System in two ways. Firstly, through the Enactment, on the advice of the British administrators, a number of specific legislation modeled on Indian Legislation which, in turn, was based on the English law. Secondly, through the decisions of the courts established by the British administrators. The higher rank of the judiciary were mostly filled by English or English-trained judges who naturally turned into English law whenever they were unable to find any local law to apply to new situations, particularly of a commercial character, caused by the very fact of British influences.

For instance, in the case of Government of Perak v Adam (1914), where it is a tort case, involving unlawful obstruction of land belonging to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    For example the court case Schenck v. United States (249 U.S. 47, 1919) in regards to the…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3 Levels of Government

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Has authority over external affairs, defence, internal security, justice (except civil law cases among Malays and other indigenous peoples, adjudicated under Islamic and traditional law), federal citizenship, finance, commerce, industry, communications, transportation and other matters etc as stated in the Ninth Schedule (List 1) if the Federal constitution.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The English law system is one of the major European legal systems which strictly formulated by different procedures. At present, it has spread and implement in many other countries such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. This essay would discuss the three main sources of law, which are Acts of parliament, judiciary precedent and statutory interpretation and also evaluate the relationship between legislation and judicial precedent. Furthermore, the rules of interpretation that contain Literal Rule, Golden Rule and Mischief would be explained in the second part of this essay by several appropriate cases.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Direct and Indirect Rule

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the British colonized Malaya, the sultanate was allowed to be preserved, though a framework of bureaucratic changes were added. In the case of Western Malaya, Malay rulers were still allowed to rule, however, under the guidance of a British resident, who could touch on all matters except those relating to religion and custom. Instead of Burma where they were completely abolished, the traditional icon of rule, the sultans, were preserved, and hence Malaya could maintain some form of national pride, despite they having little real political power.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 2. Fong, C. M. (2005). A Doctrine of Inequality of Bargaining Power and Unconscionability After Saad Marwi? Malayan Law Journal, 4, i-xii.…

    • 2677 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court System in Malaysia

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The High Courts in Malaysia are the third-highest courts in the hierarchy of courts, after the Federal Court and the Court of Appeal. Article 121 of the Constitution of Malaysia provides that there shall be two High Courts of coordinate jurisdiction—the High Court in Malaya and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak (before 1994, the High Court in Borneo). Before 1969, the High Court in Singapore was also part of the Malaysian courts system (see Law of Singapore).…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    English Law in Malaysia

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The application of English Common law could be illustrated by the situation when there is no law governing by a particular circumstances, Malaysia case law can be applied. If there is no Malaysian case law, English case law can be applied. In the case “Commonwealth of Australia v. Midford (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd”, it was held that the doctrine of sovereign or crown immunity which was developed in English Common Law after 1956 should apply in Malaysia. It was said that any developments in English Common Law after 1956 should apply in…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial powers of the country are exercised by the subordinate courts, the High Courts and the Federal Court, organized in a hierarchy with the subordinate courts at the lower level and the superior courts (comprising the High Courts, the Court of Appeal and Federal Court) at the higher level. At the apex of the hierarchy is the Federal Court, which has been in existence since 1 January 1985.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malaysian Legal System

    • 4160 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Federal Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. It was established pursuant to Article 121(2) of the Federal Constitution. Its decision binds all the courts below. Prior to 1st January 1985, the superior courts system in Malaysia was three-tiered, namely :…

    • 4160 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts in Malaysia

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Federal Court is the highest court in Malaysia. The Federal Court may hear appeals of civil decisions of the Court of Appeal where the Federal Court grants leave to do so. The Federal Court also hears criminal appeals from the Court of Appeal, but only in respect of matters heard by the High Court in its original jurisdiction (i.e. where the case has not been appealed from the Subordinate Courts).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malaysian Legal History

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Hindu-Buddhist political control and cultural influence ended with the expansion of Islam into South-East Asia sometimes in the 13th century. Malacca became a Muslim kingdom under Sultan Iskandar Shah and by the end of the 15th century she had become a power of great importance in South-East Asia. Discuss.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Written and Unwritten Law

    • 4416 Words
    • 18 Pages

    As Malaysia is a federation of thirteen states, it has altogether fourteen constitutions the Federal Constitution and thirteen State Constitutions. Johor was the first state to have a written constitution, granted in 1895 by Sultan Abu Bakar.Terengganu was granted a written constitution by Sultan Zainal Abidin III in 1911. Each of the other states in the peninsula, apart from Penang and Melaka, was given one under the terms of the respective State Agreements concluded between the United Kingdom and the Malay Rulers just before the conclusion of the Federation of Malaya Agreement (FMA) in 1948. Penang and Malacca receive theirs under the Federation of Malaya Agreement (FMA) 1957. Sabah and Sarawak were each given a new constitution under the Malaysia Agreement 1963. Each State Constitution is required under Article 71(4) of the Federal Constitution to contain the so called “essential provisions” set out in the Eighth Schedule so that it is harmoniously integrated with the Federal Constitution. If it does not, Parliament may legislate to give effect to the prescribed provisions. Thus is ensured not only compliance of State Constitutions with the Federal Constitution, but also uniformity in the State Constitutions concerning the structure of government. We will look into the Supremacy of Malaysia and the characteristic that upholds the Constitution of Malaysia together.…

    • 4416 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Malaysian court system is organized in a hierarchy like a pyramid with the subordinate courts at the base The administration of justice in Malaysia is a federal matter and courts are therefore federal. Even if the issue being litigated is one involving a state law, land matters, it would be tried in the courts constituted by federal law. The only state courts are: the Syariah Courts and the Native Courts in Sabah and Sarawak…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malaysian Court System

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    THE SUPERIOR COURTS This consists of the High Court of Malaya, the High Court of Sabah & Sarawak, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. The Federal Court is the highest court of the land. High CourtsThe High Courts have general supervisory and revisionary jurisdiction over all the Subordinate Courts and hear appeals from the Subordinate Courts in civil and criminal matters. They hear matters relating to the validity or dissolution of marriage (divorce) and matrimonial causes, bankruptcy and companies winding up matters, guardianship or custody of children, grants probates of wills and letters of administration of deceased persons, injunctions, specific performance or rescissions of contracts, legitimacy of any persons and generally actions of which the claim exceeds RM250,000-00 (except motor vehicle accidents, landlord and tenant and distress). The High Courts have powers to hear all criminal matters. Court of AppealGenerally, the Court of Appeal hears all civil appeals against decisions of the High Courts except where against judgment or orders made by consent. In cases where the claim is less than RM250,000-00 or the judgment or order relates to costs only or against decisions of a judge in chambers on an interpleader summons on undisputed facts, leave of the Court of Appeal must first be obtained. The Court of Appeal also hears criminal appeals against decisions of the High Courts. Federal CourtAll civil appeals from the Court of Appeal are heard by the Federal Court only after leave is granted by the Federal Court. The Federal Court also hears criminal appeals from the Court of Appeal only in respect of matters heard by the High Court in its original jurisdiction. THE SUBORDINATE COURTS This consists of the Sessions Courts, the Magistrates' Courts and in West Malaysia the Penghulu's Courts. Penghulu's CourtsGenerally, the Penghulu's Courts hear civil matters of…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australian law Essay Example

    • 3645 Words
    • 15 Pages

    After Colony, 1788 to 1900, law of England were to apply all colony, there was no recognition of Aboriginal law;…

    • 3645 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays