Preview

Position Paper on Andrew Linklater

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
873 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Position Paper on Andrew Linklater
[Text eingeben]

Critical Theories in International Relations

Andrew Linklater
Andrew Linklater is known as one of the most influential thinkers on Critical Theory in International
Relations of contemporary times. He currently holds the Woodrow Wilson professorship of
International Politics at Aberystwyth University in Wales, UK. He also used to teach at the University of Tasmania, at Monash University and at Keele University. Among his publications are Men and
Citizens in the Theory of International Relations (1982), Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations (1990), The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-westphalian Era (1998), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science
(2000), or Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, sovereignty and humanity (2007). His works have had great impact on CTIR, giving the discourse a strong impulse towards a normative turn in IR theory, “recover(ing)” ethical reasoning (Devetak: 2009) and the idea of a universal, cosmopolitan human community without exclusionary borders. Linklater’s normative approach originated from the lack of understanding about the conceived separateness of political theory and International
Relations (Linklater: 2011). He thus developed his thoughts particularly around the question of the relationship between “men and citizen”, natural and public law, the according moralities and the tension between them, and the matter of borders and the boundedness of identities to them.
Linklater has been influenced inter alia by Kant (Enlightment, emancipation, universalism), Marx
(borders of classes, power relations and ways to change them), Rousseau (discussion of natural law and public law), Hegel (self-created freedom) and Habermas (post-national citizenship and community), approaching the topic of emancipation from exclusionary borders by investigating the possibilities of expanding communities

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s key viewpoint is that all men are born free, but end up being in chains everywhere in the course of their lives (Rousseau and Cole 2 ). Rousseau argues that modern political states repress the basic freedoms which men possess as their birthright. These political states then lead men into the civil society in which the civil freedoms of men are not secure. Most importantly, Rousseau points out that the legitimacy of political authority can only be a product of social that all citizens agree upon motivated by the need for mutual preservation. Throughout the book, Rousseau makes key distinctions that make the basis of the discussions in this essay.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau concludes that the progression of the sciences and arts are the cause of the corruption of virtue and morality. This discourse won Rousseau fame and recognition, and it laid much of the philosophical groundwork for a second, longer work, The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Rousseau’s praise of nature is a theme that continues throughout his writing career.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is an American Historian of the Cold War and grand strategy. He graduated from the University of Texas with a PhD in history and won the Pulitzer Prize in 2012 for his famous biography George F. Kennan: An American Life. That’s one of many famous writings he has published. He was also known as the “dean of Cold War historians”(New York Times). The Cold War: A New History was written to help students better understand the many details and struggles that the world was facing from 1945 to 1991.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pathophysiology Paper

    • 3017 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Mr. F. is a seventy-three year old Caucasian male who is twice divorced and lives alone in Sweetwater, Texas. He has two children living, and two deceased children. Both of his parents are deceased; his father died at the age of sixty-nine of prostate cancer, his mother at the age of seventy-two of a stroke. He is self-employed, owning a local dirt contracting company for about thirty years now. Mr. F. stands five-foot and nine inches tall and weighs two hundred sixty pounds, exhibiting moderate obesity and has been for the past twenty-five years. He has a longstanding history of hypertension; approximately twenty years as well as a history of diabetes mellitus type two for twelve years, never having been insulin dependant. He has a smoking history of about fifty years smoking two packs per day and has been diagnosed a few years ago with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, making him oxygen-dependant for two years. He claims to only drink alcohol on a social basis. Prior to his current admission, he stated that he has not been compliant with his diabetic diet, that he does not check his blood glucose regularly nor has he been following his medication regimen as he should. His last doctors appointment was two years ago.…

    • 3017 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This idea of social relations is what Lefebvre sees as the crucial cause of the Revolution: the conflict between the long-standing aristocracy—with their exclusion from political power but still-existing seat at the top of the social hierarchy due merely to birth—and the newly-forming bourgeoisie—who held economic power through supplying money to the monarchy but were continuously excluded from the legal structure (1-2). “Such a discrepancy never lasts forever” (2) and the Revolution would bring about the transformation to restore “harmony between fact and law” (2). The battle between the economic and legal powers started the Revolution, but it would take the urban workers and peasants to bring about the true meaning of liberty and equality for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau describes the conception of inequality in A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by asserting, “there is hardly any inequality in the state of nature, all inequality which now prevails owes its strength and growth to the development of our facilities and the advance of the human mind…” (Rousseau, p. 116). Within the state of nature, Rousseau explains “equality might have been sustained, had the talents of individuals been equal…but, as there was nothing to preserve this balance, it was soon distributed…” (Rousseau, p. 94). Eventually, property rights “gave rise to the first rules of justice…” (Rousseau, p. 94) and “[man] perpetually employed in getting others to interest themselves in his lot…[and] find their advantage in promoting his own” (Rousseau, p. 95-96). He further explains that this inequality is made “permanent and legitimate by the establishment of property and laws.” (Rousseau, p. 116). Rousseau contends that the rich in society began to…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Rousseau, the General Will presents itself as a way to recover a natural freedom that men lost throughout History. By giving up remaining liberties for civil liberties granted by the general will, society becomes coordinated and unified : “What generalizes the will is less the number of voices than the common interest that unites them” (Book I-2). For Rousseau's view of a will guiding the people to occur, individual will must be subordinated and filtered through the general will. In such a perfect society, harmony reigns as individuals accept that their liberty and equality grounds on their subordination to the will of all. In this optic, one cannot disagree with the collective will because by its definition it is always fair and based…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Rousseau describes the state of nature and the origin of chance events that gave birth to a civil state, where men build social relationships and developed reason. His description of state of nature is very different from that of Locke and Hobbes, as he believes that state of nature is actually better than the civil society. According to Rousseau, civil state is the culprit behind destroying the rudimentary man. It is surprising to note that Rousseau prefers state of nature over civil state, where savage humans live amicably. Rousseau indirectly criticizes Hobbes’ way of examining original man’s traits that developed because of living in a society. Through his thought experiment, Rousseau tries…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In ancient times all men lived in a state of nature until hardships and the necessity to form a civil society between one another became eminent. Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract,” analyses the steps and reasoning behind this transition. In Rousseau’s work he focuses on several key terms in order to define this transition clearly, they include: state of nature, social contract, civil society, general will, and the sovereign.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smiths, S. Owens, P. (2008) The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1967 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself living in world with no social expectations, no competitions and no submission to the social hierarchy. Imagine yourself being free, peaceful, strong and powerful. Jean-Jacques Rousseau calls this state the natural state of man, the state that everyone should aspire to live in and that brings power to an individual. By exploring the natural state of man we are able to see how Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed a new understanding of the individual.…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Social Class |The “Age of Montesquieu” |The “Age of Rousseau” |The “Age of Voltaire” |Post-Napoleon |…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Realism vs. Liberalism

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kegley Jr. C (1995) Controversies in International Relations Theory. Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. Belmont, US: Wadsworth…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict and tension will always be around when two parties do not share the same belief or concepts. These concepts take shape when several distinctive personalities are left unsupervised. The outcome of the end results can almost leave many groups divided and prejudice against one another. Many nations are divided and often left in ruins. Many extraordinary conflicts are seeded in our nation foundation and are located throughout the course of what is known as, American Literature.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abstracts Samples

    • 2884 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This article focuses on a third generation of qualitative methods research. Third-generation qualitative methods provide a unique bridge between the single-logic-of-inference and interpretivist communities. Accepting comparison and intuitive regression as part of its underlying justification, the third-generation case study approach is readily compatible with large-n studies, as well as being accepting of many of the claims of the comparative advantages offered by quantitative methods. The article considers some of the ways in which the third generation has developed and suggest potentially fruitful directions for future research. It focuses on some key innovations in…

    • 2884 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays