Preview

Power Of The Federal Government Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Power Of The Federal Government Essay
Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been arguments over what power the state governments should have, and the powers the Federal Government should have. More recently there have been instances where the Federal Government was questionable in some of their actions. Today's Federal Government has too much power because issues such as gun control and healthcare would be better handled on the state level.
One example of an issue that would be better handled on a state level is gun control. One reason this should be up to the states is because each state should worry about their own citizens. One topic that tends to come up in gun control talks is hunting. Some people rely on guns in order to feed themselves and provide
…show more content…
Healthcare systems should be controlled by each state because it is easier to talk to a state representative, then to speak to someone at the Federal Government. According to NBC, states have a history of being able to quickly help health insurance customers. Going off of this, If the Government does not do a great job of controlling healthcare, it would be easy for healthcare providers to use “marketing abuse”. Giving the Government power over healthcare would cause a lot of complications. For example, Blue Cross Blue Shield says that Government control of healthcare will cause confusion and problems between the Federal Government and state healthcare regulators. Also, Because states might try different ways of controlling healthcare, there is a better chance that it would be overall better for the citizens.
There are many modern examples of court cases that were state v. Federal Government. One of the biggest modern court cases that had to do with Federal v. state government was Obergefell v. Hodges. The outcome of this court case said that same sex marriage was legal and that states could not say otherwise. In this instance the Federal Government overruled the states. Another example is in the case of National Federation of Independent Business v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services. In this case, many states sues the government, but the supreme court ruled that “Obamacare”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case McCulloch vs. Maryland the main conflict was whether if the state government could interfere with national government laws. The state of Maryland had imposed a tax on the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The powers extended to the state government are issue licenses, conduct local elections, regulate intrastate commerce, and provide for public health and safety. Sometimes there is a conflict between the state and federal governments in defining who an exclusive…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution gives certain powers to the federal government, such as regulating interstate commerce and national defense, while reserving other powers to the states, such as education and licensing. This division of powers allows for a balance between national unity and state autonomy, ensuring that both levels of government can operate efficiently while maintaining their respective authorities. The Federal System helps prevent tyranny by spreading power across different levels of government and allowing for diverse policies to address the needs of various…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who should have more power state or federal? Federal should have more power because federal government can do more things than state can. State can only do things in that state. Federal can do more things than just stuff in that state. State government can do more things in that state for example;if your state allows you to have a gun and you're traveling to a gun range in a different state but that state doesn't allow you to have a gun and you get pulled over and get arrested.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federal Government has power over the United states. The federalist like and view the Federal government with most of the power. The…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    national governments powers. The idea of federalism is mentioned in the constitution and it is the division of powers between state and national governments, however there are often conflicts between these state governments with the national governments on which laws that states can and cannot enact. The tenth amendment of the constitution states the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the states or the people; This is known as the reserve clause and the powers obtained by states from this are known as the reserved powers. The problem with this is that there are many modern day issues that the constitution does not cover such as the topic of abortion. So depending on your interpretation of the constitution you could argue that decisions on abortion should be made by the national government, however you could also argue that since the states and federal governments are both not granted powers on this issue in the constitution that it should automatically be granted to the…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Federalism

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There have been many of the events that led to the change in the relationship between state and federal government. The relationship and authority of states and the federal government are governed by the U.S. Constitution. At first, states had the majority power, but over time federal government gained more control. Their relationship has changed over time because the federal government delegated certain enumerated powers while the state government reserved all the other powers by the Constitution. The constitution prohibited the national government from undertaking certain actions, such as imposing taxes on exports and from passing laws restraining certain things, like freedom of speech or religion. Most of these prohibited powers are listed in Article I, section 9, and in the first eight amendments of the constitution. The federal government power has increased where the relationship among the branches has changed as well. The division of power between the states and the federal government has shifted. Some of these changes have occurred in accordance with the amendment process described in Article V of the constitution. The Tenth Amendment gives to the states reserved powers, which means that any power not given to the federal government or denied to the states is reserved to the states. Some of these numerous powers given by the Tenth Amendment to the states, including the power to regulate commerce within their borders and the power to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Mandate Essay

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With Clinton in office he increased under-funded federal mandates to states. These changes have caused Federalism to change as well, with the age-old question still pondering in the minds of Americans, who actually has the most power, the states or national…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In general society and everything has become more complicated, more laws have been passed. Every one passes the buck and doesn’t want to take responsibility and plays the “blame game”. It is gridlock in Washington DC, the bureaucracy has grown vast and complex, nothing gets done. But if Presidential powers are rolled back the office of the Presidency will lose credibility, power and respect. Public opinion regarding the president’s job performance influences presidential power; the higher the public approval, the more power the chief executive has to influence others within the political system, including Congress. The President may have charisma and influence, but the real power comes from Congress. The Constitution is supposed to prevent…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Government Power

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How much power should the government in general and the President in particular be given in times of national crisis? The powers and duties of the president are defined in Article II of the Constitution making him commander in chief of armed forces, chief diplomat, nominating judges, presenting state of union to congress and having the power to pardon and veto. However, the Constitution grants far less powers to the nation’s president in Article II than it does to congress in Article I. Throughout history the unclear statements have given countless possibilities for presidents to expand their powers. One president who took many drastic steps to keep our nation together was Abraham Lincoln.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first: McCullough v. Maryland. This fits because it is the most landmark federalism case ever decided, which more clearly established the limit of state powers. It’s hard to conceive that any federalism case can be considered without this case. The second is Crawford v. Marion County Election Board: This case revolved around a 2012 Indiana Voter ID Law. The Supreme Court ruled it constitutional, on the grounds that "It is for state legislatures to weigh the costs and benefits of possible changes to their election codes, and their judgment must prevail," which would certainly apply to the California government's argument. The last case is Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc: This is similar to the previous case - it revolves around a state passing stricter voter laws. It was struck down however, because their law was deemed to "preempt" federal voter law. This would support the federal government's case in my…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government of any kind is set up to make a country run smother and with less problems. The United States government should have less ability to override state policy without proof of why it should be overridden. It should be something that each state has the ability to defend against and with a panel. Federal policy is about an overall problem but not the problem at the state level since each state would face cases of different types of problems.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays