Pocahontas, a well known figure in history, was the main topic of John Smith’s letter to Queen Anne of Great Britain in 1616. John Smith was incredibly fond of her and believed that she should be welcomed and respected in England. John Smith speaks highly of Pocahontas, as well as Queen Anne in this letter. John has had many encounters (both good and bad) with Pocahontas, and he mentions these instances in a positive and respectful way. John Smith creates emphasis and uses different techniques to convey his message to Queen Anne. He uses hyperboles as well as personification to enhance his main idea. While this letter is meant to be about Pocahontas, he also speaks about Queen Anne herself in order to help persuade her.…
The Non-Fiction Historical Book 1776 By David McCullough is a historically accurate and in depth view of The American Revolution; starting from The Battle of Bunker Hill, Boston, Brooklyn, New York, Fort Washington, and ending its Analysis at the Battle of Trenton in 1776. There are many fascinating features, trends, themes, and characteristics used in 1776 that make the book a fluent and enjoyable read. Also the book gives a very detailed and informative account of the battles and military life from the Battle of Boston to the Battle of Trenton. Finally the author, David McCullough, of the book as many other works and experiences that tell the reader why and how 1776 is such a credible source as well as expertly written. 1776 gives an expertly written view by David McCullough and a historical accurate account of The American Revolution’s battles and skirmishes.…
During inception the natives agreed to trading provisions to the colonists in exchange for metal tools. In 1609 John Smith the governor, started establishing raiding parties for food from the natives. The Powhatan fled further away from the Jamestown fort which caused a period of famine for the English from 1609-10. Many investors including The London Company became concerned about the future of the Virginia Company and how it would survive. Peace had been established and both parties knew they could benefit off of one another. The Powhatan wanted metal hatchets and copper and the colonist needed food. This didn’t last long before the Powhatan figured out the true intentions of the colonists. “Your…
The author of “There is No True History of Westward Expansion,” Robert Morgan, believes that Westward Expansion was pursued by the common people of America, and the government followed the people. This belief is false due to the fact that the American government was the source of the idea of expanding to the West. The American government, specifically President Thomas Jefferson, was the main push for westward expansion.…
If not, tension always arises, creating a recipe for conflict and war. In New England, when the English settlers came, tensions emerged among the settling communities as well as the Native American communities. Land was a key factor in the tensions, driven by increasing English settlers and inter-tribal politics; the Pequot people carried the burden of what Philbrick terms as “European-style genocide”. The devastating brutality of the resultant conflict led all sides to seek accommodation and end the conflict. In both books, the themes, ideas and the driving forces that dictate the course of actions are similar, only that they happen at different centuries (Philbrick…
Newspaper editor John L. O'Sullivan first used the term manifest destiny in an 1845 article to describe the inevitability surrounding the annexation of Texas. Since then it has come to describe the belief among American settlers and political leaders that it was their God-given right and duty to expand U.S. territory, customs, and institutions throughout North America from coast to coast. The concept gained traction during the nineteenth century as immigration and land acquisitions, including the Louisiana Purchase (1803), drastically increased the feasibility and pace of westward expansion.…
7.He uses this story to show how some of the colonist tried to advoid war.…
Pocahontas’ initial presentation reveals a character with a dependency on others to save her from unpleasant situations. Her language choice is highly influential in constructing this surrounding stereotype of dependency. Rather than think of how she could save herself, her character asks where John Smith is because “He’d know what to do.” (Taylor 14). Considering Pocahontas’ decision to cast aside her potential independence and instead display helplessness illustrates the stereotype that, as a native woman, she is incapable of saving herself due to…
When presenting her argument, Kupperman only gave accounts based on English perspective. For example, she writes, “he further argued…or, “Smith recorded”, basing most of her conclusions from colonists (Kupperman, 1977, p.276). It would have been more advantageous for her had she provided accounts from the Natives themselves; this piece does after all talk frequently about them. Another issue present is Kupperman’s failure to discuss in depth about the effects of mistreating the Natives. Initially she writes, “In practice… severity, was found to be more useful”, describing the process in which Englishmen, “[dealt] with the salvages” (Kupperman, 1977, p.267). She was vague in providing details of what happened after the said mistreatment.…
In the Chesapeake Bay the Powhatans were originally the dominant power among the Native Americans. The Powhatan tribes flourished under the Powhatan Confederacy until the arrival of the Europeans. Tension arouse between the natives and the settlers as the new colonist began establishing their town and had a scarce amount of food leading them to raid the Powhatan’s food source. The natives fought back and attempted to restore their supply of foods when Lord De La Warr declared war against the Powhatan’s therefore marking the beginning of the Powhatan war. The Powhatan villages were raided, burned and the cornfields were torched down cutting off their main food source. A peace treaty ended although it was shortly broken after the Powhatans attacked the Settlers due to them further expanding and into English territory. Like many wars the gain of territory is one of the fundamental reasons as to why many people start a war. The Powhatan were defeated due to lack of unity despite of their confederacy while they were attacked by diseases and the Europeans advance weapons which gave the Europeans the upper hand.…
The third reason why Jamestown colonist died was because of their bad relationship with the Powhatan Indians. The English and the Powhatan Indians didn’t get along. Maybe it started with the Indians or maybe it started with the Englishmen? I know that during the first weeks of settlement the Indians killed two of the Englishmen. I also know that within the first year Francis West along with 36 men went up the Chesapeake Bay to trade with the Powhatans and they ended up cutting two off their heads taking the grains and instead of going back to…
The reason everything was going good for them had left. John smith had a peace with the indians. Pocahontas would bring food for the colonists as long as john smith was there. Which led to the starving times.…
8. What is the main type of conflict in this story. Provide examples from the story to explain your answer.…
Descriptive details in this novel help tremendously by, showing us the pain the slaves have been through. The adjectives they used elaborated the suffering times and their “Masters” attitude. Visuals in a book paint a picture in one’s mind so we understand the story. In the story it says Delie was stripped and the men bowed their heads to show respect for Delie. The picture in my mind was they were all surrounding Delie in the Spring House, with their sweat dripping down their bodies, and hearing the loud snap as it tears Delie’s skin. That one reason why the novel’s better.…
With the Natives being pushed out of their homeland, and Slaves getting forced to do many things or being punished, both groups figured out ways to act and show how they felt. Looking at both how slaves and natives were treated by the English, and how they responded and how they used agency gives historians more information of how people really lived and interacted during this time. In history, if people just looked at one perspective during the time they would not get the full sense of what we going on, and it would be hard to see causes and effects of big events that happened in history. By looking at documents from Natives and Slaves, and from Colonist we get to see the big picture of what was really going on between these groups. Also, it helps to see that the Natives and Slave did not just sit around but actually tried to get freedom and land that they deserved. Natives and Slaves used many forms of agency to try to defeat the Colonist. By doing so they changed the perspective of some Colonist and they found ways to hurt colonist to put them in debt and made it hard to live in the New…