AB POLISCI – III
“Resolved that, there be total gun ban during elections in the Philippines”
1st affirmative speaker
“Mr. Chairperson, honorable judges, worthy opponents, ladies and gentlemen: Good afternoon!”
“The resolution before us today is that there be total gun ban during elections in the Philippines. We, the affirmative side, define total gun ban as prohibition against any person who bears, carries or transports firearms or other deadly weapons outside his residence or place of business and in public places even if licensed to posses or carry the same. In addition, the ban covers airguns, airsoft guns and replicas/imitations of firearms in whatever form that can cause an ordinary person to believe they are real. The only persons/entities allowed to carry firearms during elections should only be the officers and members of the Philippine National Police, Armed Forces, and other agents of law enforcement or government security agencies.”
“The affirmative side believes that total gun ban is indeed necessary for several reasons. One reason is that, this measure is seen to curb violence especially during election period which is historically marked by bloody clashes among conflicting candidates. Case in point incidents like the murder of 3 village persons in Zamboanga del Sur, just last October 2012, for supporting a particular candidate. Two clans who were supporting different candidates were stabbed and shot after a political gathering. And who would ever forget the gruesome and ever infamous Maguindanao massacre? Even COMELEC passed resolution drawn from Section 261 (q) of the Omnibus Election Code which identifies carrying firearms during election period is an “election offense”. Also, candidates running in the 2013 polls are prohibited from enlisting bodyguards including members of the Philippine National Police or the Armed Forces, unless warranted and assigned security detail by the COMELEC. The government had earlier identified high-risk areas for the May 2013 polls with history of election-related violence, private armies, running family feuds as well as rebel and criminal groups.” Public polls and surveys even shows that people are in favor of total gun prohibition.
“Another reason would be the further worsening of irresponsible gun use, like the most recent incident of shooting spree which killed and injured bystanders and market vendors in Kawit, Cavite last January 4. Or even the devastating incident of death by a 7-year-old girl and 4-year-old boy who were hit by celebratory gunfire or stray bullets during the New Year’s Eve celebrations. Pro-life groups, Roman Catholic Bishops and even members of Congress added voices calling out for a total, permanent gun ban not only during election period. Among their gun-control measures were the proposed Citizen’s Protection Act of 2010 which had been unfortunately gathering dust in Congress. In due course, “possession by civilians or private persons of such deadly weapons is not a matter of right”. “It assumes the predominance in our society of the law of the jungle tacitly encouraging a ‘war of all against all’ and ‘every man for himself and the devil take the hindmost’ rather than indicating trust in the government and our duly constituted authorities.”, it says. “
“Another important reason is that authorities failed to seize illegal firearms which led to the increasing violence involving gun-use. According to Dr. Jennifer Santiago Oreta, in her work entitled “Gun Proliferation and Violence”, PNP estimated of loose firearms in the country in 2009 was at 1.1 million. The highest number of illegal firearms were reported in the areas of Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, CALABARZON, Central Visayas, Southern Mindanao and Metro Manila, which was not surprising, considering that certain parts of the region were conflict areas. Based on these PNP datas, of the estimated 1.1 million loose and illegal firearms, 559,326 have expired/ not renewed licenses; 15,676 illegal firearms are in the hands of threat groups like the Moro Islamic Liberation Front or MILF, New People’s Army, the Abu Sayaff Group and 5, 725 illegal arms are in the hands of criminal elements.”
Ladies and gentlemen, considering all the definitions and justifications, I now appeal to all of you to approve and support the stand of the affirmative side that there be total gun ban during elections in the Philippines. We, the affirmative side, believe that the means of prohibiting gun-use would be of greater good to all Filipino people.
Thank you!
I now stand for the cross-examination.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Therefore, both Soudani and Grisez have persuasive reasons for or against gun control. Their opinions represent the two contradicting attitudes towards gun-control laws. One group prefers tighter restrictions on firearms selling and circulation. However, the other group views it as an infringement of their Second Amendment rights ("Gun Control"). All in all, an examination of gun-control laws, from various perspectives, reveals we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the political and social…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness is the work for which Abbey is best known and by which he is most frequently defined. It contains his views on a variety of subjects, from the problems of the United States Park Service to an angry indictment of the evils of technology masquerading under the guise of progress. No voice is more eloquent in the praise of America's remaining wilderness nor more vitriolic in attacking those who would exploit and destroy it for profit.…
- 1142 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
While comparing the two articles ‘The Case for Banning Guns’ and ‘The Case Against Banning Guns’ the one that makes the most sense and is the most logical is the latter choice. While both sides made realistic arguments, the author, Paul Waldman, choice of words point the reader to believe that he realizes his view is unobtainable. Throughout the second article, the author, Shiha Dalmia, had many valid points, including the example used to reiterate her point about the fact that the biggest mass murders in America in the entire last century have been done without the use of guns.…
- 775 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In her essay “Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed,” Nan Desuka brings for the issue whether handguns should be outlawed except to police and other service units. I disagree with Desuka’s position on banning handguns. This essay offers arguments why they should be banned without offering realistic solutions to the problems Desuka states in owning handguns. Retaining legalized handguns affects all of us. It’s essential to Collectors and sportsmen, and vital to all our safety. I do not believe that banning handguns will overall decrease violent crimes or the deaths due to violent crimes.…
- 1132 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
With the rising mass murders across the country, many citizens are wondering if we need more gun control. Pro gun control advocates are saying it is necessary for three reasons of many: high capacity magazines, suicide rates, and active gun laws having loopholes. Anti-gun control advocates are saying it is not necessary because of the decrease in homicide, mental state of murderers, and the right to self defense. Citizens are not just taking sides too, so are presidential candidates. Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton is for pro- gun control, and Donald Trump, a Republican candidate, is for anti-gun control.…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
He inspires change in this article, in hope of extending that to his readers. His use of facts, and a well structured essay make for an overall convincing argument. He does not appear to use much of his own voice or opinions in the paper, helping to make it seem unbiased and more so a speculation and analysis of gun control.…
- 885 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Ever since the ratification of the 2nd amendment to the Constitution, one of ten amendments in the Bill of Rights, people of the United States have right to keep and bear arm in order to protect themselves. However, the extent of firearms’ usage is not limited to just people protecting each other and themselves. Accompanied with the right to keep and bear arm is the thread of gun violence. Mass shooting incidents, apparent evidences of gun violence have been seen all over the country. Gun violence has been causing fear for the people and endless loss for the country overall.…
- 1955 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Amidst all the raging debates regarding gun control, it is important to evaluate the issue from the perspective of the role that guns play in the lives of citizens. Crime has been on the rise in several American states. The rising cases of homicide in the past few years have prompted several states to implement stringent gun control laws that restrict purchase and possession of firearms by civilians. The American constitution allows civilians to own firearms for their own protection. However, this is not the main argument why gun control should not be allowed. This argument supports the need for Americans to protect themselves and their families. America does not need gun control but stringent policies that address the causes of gun misuse (Lott 83).…
- 2832 Words
- 12 Pages
Best Essays -
There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…
- 369 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Only through the blatant abrogation of explicit constitutional rights is gun control even possible. It must be enforced with such violations of individual rights as intrusive search and seizure and the most severely victimizes those who most need weapons for self-defense. With various gun control proposals on different agendas with the including of licensing, waiting periods, and bans on “Saturday night specials” are of little or if any value as crime-fighting measures because with the banning of guns to reduce crime makes more logic as banning alcohol to reduce drunk driving and with the persuasive evidence shows that civilian gun ownership can be a powerful deterrent to…
- 1128 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion, it is clear from that the debate over gun control won't fade anytime soon. It is sure that in our lives we will see huge changes in the present strategy managing the ownership of guns. It is important we give consideration to this civil argument seeing as how it will have an incredible effect on our lives.…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It is to be believed that America’s public safety is being threatened by guns. There have been numerous events leading up to this accusation. Today, there is a rising debate whether gun control should be legalized or forbidden. There stand two sides of this dispute, one is for bearing arms and the other is against it. One could infer that one side remains superior over the other. In America majority vote rules, therefore the gun control laws remain not into effect due to the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to possess and bear arms shall not be infringed” (ProCon.org, np).…
- 774 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Approximately 30,000 people die a year because of guns when they are used in both self defense and murder. Many people argue whether restrictions on guns should be enacted or repealed. Tensions have grown high on both sides of the issue making it a hot topic in our country today. Many people cast their votes in the last election based on their feelings about this very issue. The divide among Americans when it comes to gun control is large, spanning from those who want strict regulation, including an outright ban on all firearms, to those who want complete legalization of individual gun ownership. Guns can be used for killing or protection, so it is important to examine all…
- 1774 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The United States has been a gun culture country since the day the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776. After many decades, gun ownership had rapidly increased, and many lives have been saved with a gun. An American citizen can legally purchase a handgun at age twenty-one and a rifle at the age of eighteen with a cleared background check by a licensed dealer. In recent months’ guns has become a very conversional topic because of all the incident happening around. For example, Orlando mass shooting, where 49 people died, and Dallas sniper shooting where 5 police officer died. Compared to early days USA have powerful police forces protecting its citizen. All the firearms should be banned because guns have already caused many deaths.…
- 638 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* Section 1= suffrage or voting should be done by the Filipino Citizen who are legally registered in the COMELEC and in his legal age (18) eighteen years old above and shall live in the Philippines for atleast one year and in…
- 1316 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays