Preview

Pre Mughal Era Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
924 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pre Mughal Era Case Study
2.1) Property law in PRE-MUGHAL PERIOD:
Before Mughals period tenure system of ownership of land during ancient period is too. The question arises on ownership of land has been very large discussion issue amongst economic historians, which led them in a conclusions which are largely confined into two options, first is the state ownership and second is the peasant ownership.
There are many combinations of the states & peasant rights which have been suggested earlier. The king don’t have any kind of property right over the land, whereas exception is right to a share of the production in the return of the affording protection to his subjects.
If a person proprietor exercised only for a qualified ownership over his property, the the king became
…show more content…
The peasants as individual enjoy having the right to use their land as long as they cultivating it. Sir Henry Maine, pointed out that each of the family have a duty to submit the cultivation and pasturage as per the common rule. The Grazing of the ground & the forest tracing were adjoined the village with the common ownership for the communities of the entire village. The share of production paid by the peasants is generally considered as a revenue. The method of the actual division is that, the peasant’s production or the state’s share on it was estimated by the inspection of the quantity of growing …show more content…
The King has right to levy the taxes, which was justified by the facts which gave his subjects protection, the peasant can be ejected by the king from his holding; while the peasant has a right which is based on the basis of the merchant's right to merchandise as payment of tax have no interference with proprietary rights, similarly the peasant paid the taxes which allow his right over the holdings. The peasant has to face natural attitude of the Muslim ruler towards the holding, as per Muslim legal system, the person who cultivate on his land, is the owner of the land. The Muslim law principle over ownership of the land by the peasant, had never been questioned.
The system of sharing, appraisement and measurement established by Mughals. Emperor Akbar considered such agrarian reforms as important task for his own reasons. The Mughal Empire during their reign to expand then they had to maintain a large numbers of military officers and administrative. Mughal Emperor Akbar introduces the Mansabdari system for land revenue collection. From condition being more chaotic, Akbar compelled to initiate the reforms in administration and in land revenue

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Tang dynasty the equal field system was used but in the Byzantine empire the theme system was used. Each system was organized in it’s own way for that empire. In China the equal field system was introduced as an improvement from the land distribution techniques of Han China that had surcumb to the pressure of higher classes taking most of the land and causing dispute in communities. For the equal field system agricultural land was given to individuals and/or families based on the fertility of the land and how much was needed by the receivers. From the land given 1/5 th was kept to pass into the next line of the person’s family and the remainder of that was redistributed when the receiver didn’t need as much land or faced better circumstances. By doing this land was not hoarded by a single family and…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In medieval Europe, country life was governed by a system call “feudalism.” In a feudal society, the king gave large pieces of land called fiefs to noblemen and bishops. Peasants without land were known as serfs, they did most of the work on the fiefs: They planted and harvested crops and gave most of the produce to the landowner. In exchange for their labor, they were allowed to live on the land.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Families “owned” the right to use of land, but they did not own the land itself…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peasants felt oppression coming from their lords and did not appreciate how they were being treated. In Articles of Peasants of Memmingen, which was a document written by the peasant people themselves, they believe it was "pitiful" that they were being bought by their lords and looked at that action in a religious aspect. They believe they are equally judged by God and that they should not have been "purchased and redeemed...". The peasants want to be equal and have their freedoms from the biases and…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This last class was divided into two groups consisting of free peasants and indentured servants. The free peasants held their own businesses and paid rent to the lords in order to use their lands. The indentures peasants, however, where bound to the land in which they labored to earn their stay. When the lands changed ownerships, the peasants living in those lands immediately came under the jurisdiction of the new lord. That class was under the control of these nobles who squeezed the peasantry hard in effort to maintain their luxurious lifestyle (Tignor p 428).…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    In various human right instruments, both international and domestic, property rights constitute tenets of human right. Their essence and relation to human beings have been explained in a number of theories. These theories, in similar manner, indicate that property rights are subjected to limitation. No property right is absolute. In fact, this point is a feature of all limitation. In most, of all cases, individual rights are subjected to collective interests, which also hold true to property rights. One among others is expropriation, the theme of this study. Here in, public interest limitation will be examined from the perspective of various theories of property. Theoretical investigation of the matter would be done. Hence, laws and policies will be examined. In Section One an overview on expropriation and public interest is given. After setting this background on the two concepts, Section Two discusses about the different theories of property and how they support or neglect the concept of expropriation. Finally, an analysis on the Ethiopian law from these perspectives follows.…

    • 4291 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vested property, originally enemy property1, is being returned to its “original owners or their heirs, or successors in interest of original owners or their heirs”2, from the custodianship of the government by the Return of Vested Property Act, 20013 as amended in 2011. From 1965 to 2012 the property has been under control and management of the government through various laws and after such a long period of Government acquisition and management by many ways like leasing or letting it out4, the returning of vested property faces problem in finding out the original owners or their true inheritors. Thus, the returning finds a close link, between the issue of vested property and the law of succession (in particular the law of inheritance). The legal aspects of vested property and the law of inheritance together face a paradox in property rights and the law of inheritance in Bangladesh.…

    • 2616 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Mughal empire

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I am writing this editorial to demonstrate the growth of our country commensurate with our faith in Allah.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 1815 to 1949 Uttarakhand was divided into two kingdoms, Tehri Garhwal state and the colonial territory of Kumaun (Shiva, 7). The political structure of hill society in those two kingdoms was distinct from the rest of India in that along with the prescense of communal tradition, there was an absence of sharp class division (Shiva 14). The land was understood to belong to the community rather as a whole even though there was a caste system in place. The natural environment for the hill people consisted of a system of tillage and methods of crop rotation (Shiva 15). The production was directed towards subsistence in which the surplus was exported to Tibet and southwards to the plains. In fact, the communities living in the hill usually had six months of stock in grain with a supplement of fish, fruit, vegetable, and animal meat (Shiva, 15). The hill district constituted over 60% of owner-cultivators and 80% of the total population farmed with the help of family labour. By the turn of the century, nine-tenths of the hill men cultivated with full-ownership rights . " The absence of sharp inequalities in land ownership within body cultivating propietors --who formed bulk…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rama and Lord Ram

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    9. Lord is the Proprietor: Bhoktaram Yajna tapasam (Bhagavad Gita 5.29). Bharat was ruling the kingdom on Lord Ram’s behalf by keeping the Paduka’s on the Throne. We are only caretakers, He is the real proprietor, He can give and take away. The Caretaker acts according to the will of the owner.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Mughal administration, land revenue was collected in the form of crop sharing. The two methods…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    b) Khet batai: The share was decided when the crop was still standing in the fields, and a division of…

    • 5846 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Land Revenue System

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Zamindari system was introduced in early British period. The Permanent settlement Act was passed in 1793 and initially introduced in Bengal. The…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gobindpura Case Study

    • 3621 Words
    • 15 Pages

    There are a number of cases dealing with land acquisition process in India, such as the case of Singur in West Bengal, Noida in Uttar Pradesh, and Kalinagr in Orissa etc. Dispossessed people in all these cases struggled a lot for compensating their loss or getting their land back. The case of Gobindpura village is not an exception to the norm. The present chapter deals with the struggle being faced by displaced people of village Gobindpura.…

    • 3621 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays