I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…
Sociology and economics, gives theology a more informed understanding of the plight of the poor and oppressed. While critics have proposed that these theologies have a Marxist sympathy. This isn’t entirely true because the core of liberation theology has never been Marxist. “It is rather the compassionate identification with the poor and their struggle for justice, inspired by the life and teachings of Jesus himself, which is at its heart. “Instead of social analysis, which was seen as a methodological tool, from the outset liberation theology placed greater emphasis on the crucial role of God’s people committed praxis- or, in other words, the Christian communities’ action inspired by faith and informed theological reflection”…
Good Moring everyone! Welcome to Good Moring America I’m Zaquane Cooper. Today we will be interviewing Catholic leader Pope Francis. We are going to be discussing his focus on poverty, which he presented during his speech to congress. Pope Francis calling on them to have compassion for most Vulnerable among and we are going to find out why he is called “Slum Pope” and” a Pope for the poor. So everyone let give it up for Catholic leader Pope Francis.…
In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…
In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…
The rise of a social gospel perspective within the Roman Catholic Church took time and created friction during it’s ascendancy. In 1876, Archbishop James Bayley of Newark had told Roman Catholics that God permits poverty in order that the wealthier classes have the opportunity to perform alms-giving and advocated “patience and resignation to His holy will” on the part of the poor. In other words, not only did the poor exist to facilitate the…
In Peter Singer’s article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” there are a few items that require further discussion. Peter Singer critiques our ordinary ways of thinking and in spite, very few people have accepted his conclusions. I will discuss Peter Singer’s goal and his presented argument in relation to this issue. In return, I will also mention the three counter-arguments to his position and the responses made by Singer. It is important to define Singer’s concept of marginal utility and to show the relation to his argument. We will need to compare how the ideas of duty and charity change in Singer’s proposed world. Finally, in conclusion my own personal response will be made to Singer’s argument either supporting his position, going against his position, or simply in the middle of his position. To begin one must truly understand the definition of an argument in the terms of philosophy. “For philosophers, then, the term "argument" doesn 't imply the idea it often does when we use the term to suggest anger, emotion, and hurt feelings. Rather, in this context, arguments simply present a conclusion and suggest why certain reasons indicate that conclusion is true, or probable” (Mosser K, 2010).…
The issue of moral obligations towards the global poor has always been a contentious affair to be discussed for fear of problematic resolutions that may affect academia on a personal level. Peter Singer, most notable for his authorship of “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and the drowning child analogy, presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection, ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless, Singer builds his argumentative framework in regards to moral obligations to the global poor on solid…
Two thirds of the population of earth is poor. Poor countries reproduce quicker than the rich ones making the poor people of the world multiply faster than the rich. Rich countries such as America have been trying to help by donating resources, offering immigration and using their money to help provide for poorer countries. Hardin believes that we shouldn’t just…
In the essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” author, Peter Singer, exercises his theory about everyone’s moral obligation to help world hunger. Every day people make choices, whether it be what pants to wear, what food items to buy at the store, or whether or not you donate money to those suffering. Across the world there are avoidable sufferings according to Singer as long as people do their part; “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, we ought to morally do it” (889).…
In some form or other, human services have been provided to the less-fortunate by such disparate groups as the church, the government, or wealthy local landowners. Feudalism, for instance, provided for the lower classes by allotting them a small plot of land to farm during England’s Middle Ages (Martin, M. E. 2007). They were basically slaves to the landowners, and could be sold or traded as property, but it was the landowners’ obligation to ensure that they were housed, clothed, and fed, life’s three basic necessities. Churches also served the poor, with able members of a community or parish getting taxed so that those less-fortunate members could receive aid. Poverty was neither viewed as a crime nor something for which to be ashamed, but, rather, the…
Everyday wealthy and middle class Americans across the country spend money on luxury items such as: flat screen televisions, laptop computers, digital cameras, fancy cars, and smart phones. At the same time, across the globe in poverty stricken countries, people and children are living in destitution. Many of these people lack a basic human need which commonly includes nutrition, healthcare, education, clothing, shelter, and clean water. Peter Singer, author of 'The Singer Solution to World Poverty', suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do, however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias, and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable to any extent. Is it morally right to make a hardworking American give up all luxuries to the needy people they will never meet? Of course, Americans should feel the need to donate to the needy people of our world. Although the amount they donate should be entirely up to them.…
However, religious believers themselves shouldn’t just be the only ones who should show more compassion. In order to help the poor, everyone in the world should help in different ways (e.g. donating to charity). God has given us free will, so it’s the religious believers’ choice if he or she wants to show more compassion to the poor or not. The religious believer may also be in a difficult position themselves where they are unable to contribute to helping the poor.…
* The book often mentions the economic system should be set up to help the poor. What is the Church’s view on acquiring large material gains…
In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, they more they did for themselves, and became richer.” Many people think he is against the poor and wants them gone. However if you take a look and read carefully you can see he wants to have them raised and out of poverty. His way may be different from most people however he wants them to help them still as he states the “The best way of doing good for the poor is not making them easy in poverty ,but leading or driving them out.” This shows us that he wants to get them out or free them from the captivity of poverty…