Preview

President Wilson And Senator Norris: A Comparative Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
President Wilson And Senator Norris: A Comparative Analysis
After reading the opposing arguments put forward by President Wilson and Senator Norris I believe President Wilson made a better case, albeit by a small margin. The reasons I believe this are the following: first, Wilson touches on how Germany broke it`s word after promising to stop unrestricted submarine warfare, and resumed unrestricted warfare against neutral ships. Senator Norris makes an argument for this as well stating that the British have also violated international law by mining waterways. However, no major incidents such as the sinking of the Lusitania ever arose from British mines. Furthermore, Germany went back on its word, and started unrestricted submarine attacks again after explicitly promising not to. Second, Wilson touches …show more content…
However, the country could have reacted differently, and done a couple of different things other than declare war. First, we could have become completely neutral like Senator Norris advocated for, and not shipped goods to any of the countries involved in the war. Second, we could have carried on with business as usual and accepted that Americans may be killed due to unrestricted submarine warfare. Third, we could have entered the war on the side of allies, but on a much smaller scale and committed less resources and men. Fourth, we could have declared war and completely committed to it and dedicate ourselves to winning the war. This final option is what we ended up doing. These are just of many options, but they are the most plausible options that were available at the time. Personally, I believe we made the correct decision, and handled the situation as well as it possibly could have been handled. Had we not gone to war Germany may have potentially won, and sight it`s sights on other countries, and possibly the United States itself. Only partially committing ourselves to the war would have been a bad idea as well. The war would have been prolonged further, and the outcome could have gone either way. Fully committing to the war was the best option it expedited the fall of the German Empire, and ensured that the allies would be victorious, thus ending the ability of the German autocracy to act upon it`s imperialist ambitions. To recap President Wilson gave a more convincing argument than Senator Norris because of issues like the broke promise to end unrestricted submarine warfare, the Zimmerman Telegram, and the duty of the United States to help spread democracy. The country agreed with him, and shortly after this speech the United States declared war on Germany, and we committed ourselves to bring down Germany. In conclusion, due

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doc 5 – according to pres. Wilson, the German U-boat warfare against trade is also warfare against the US. This is significant b/c it shows the rising opposition towards Germany.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason that the United States should have went to war with Germany, is because of the sinking of the Lusitania and the Sussex. “Germany announced that it was beginning unrestricted warfare . This meant that Germany would attack any ships attempting to bring good to England or France within weeks German submarines began sinking United States merchant vessels, killing 23 American Citizens” (Document 5, paragraph 4). Due to the sinking many lives were lost, including innocent American citizens. This caused…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zinn Chapter 14

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    f. Because the casualties were in the extremes and they did not want to scare their citizens to back out of the war.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Wilson had to make some difficult decisions. He declared that the United States would be neutral in the war and called on Americans to be “neutral in fact as well as in name, impartial in thought as well as in action.” Other influential political leaders also argued strongly in favor of neutrality. When Europe went to war in August 1914, most Americans believed that the war did not concern them. There were other reasons why the United States tried to remain neutral, over a third of Americans were either European-born or were the children of European immigrants. Therefore American involvement would create new problems in a society already strained by the task of taking in so many diverse groups.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    America was not doing a good job of being neutral. It was trading with the allies, giving them an advantage over the Germans. We obviously wanted the allies to win, otherwise we'd not have provided advantage. Also, we were being way too sensitive to things done by the other side, the things that brought us into…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woodrow Wilson pointed out that we are not going to war to defeat our enemies, rather to protect our allies or states with democracies. Wilson reminds the Americans, “We have seen the last of neutrality in these circumstances... the world must be made safe for democracy: its peace must be planted upon the tested foundation of liberty,”(Document F). The president played a big role because he justified our entrance into World War 1 with good reasoning, to make the world safe for democracy. This reasoning allowed American citizens to think of entering the war as more of a noble cause than remaining…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This made it hard for Americans to be neutral because they were led to believe that the Germans were cruel people. The Germans were not cruel, but they were not perfect either. They used submarines, called “U-boats,” to break through the British blockade. This was very controversial because international law said that if you wanted to destroy a ship that was a warship, you needed to stop the ship, warn them about what you were planning to do, and let passengers get off and go to safety. Submarines do not play by these rules.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was right to enter WWI because Germany was sinking America’s ships although they were neutral, the U.S. was being plotted against by Germany, and Germany would’ve won the war. Germany was sinking and would’ve kept sinking America’s boats, although they were neutral. Document 1 states, “…use its submarines to sink every vessel…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1915, the German U-boat sank the Lusitania, which killed 128 Americans. Not wanting to anger the Americans more, Germany expressed regret for the killed Americans and agreed to pay indemnity for the lives lost. “The Lusitania sinking was a turning point for the United States. From this moment on, America’s decision about entering the war depended on the submarine war policy chosen by Germany.”…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    americans perpair for war

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B) Yes because we shouldn’t have hushed into anything and we did something about the boat attacks by making an agreement and then they proposed a threat and then we came into the war for a good cause.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we look back on this historical event, many would argue if dropping the atomic bomb was the right choice. Strategically and politically, Truman was justified in dropping the bomb, but morally it wasn’t the right decision. America didn’t enter the war until December 7th, 1941, when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The US had been trying to stay out, but many knew their entrance…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, in 1941 when the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor the U.S. had enough. The attack left America with less imports and exports. If the U.S. would have joined the war sooner than the Pearl Harbor attack might not have happened. Along with the Pearl Harbor attack America had less food, gas and clothing…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States made the right decision by joining World War 1. Until 1917 the United States remained neutral. But after 1917 several factors made American neutrality difficult to maintain. The factors that enabled President Woodrow Wilson to take action from neutrality to engagement included Germany’s unrestricted warfare, “Zimmerman Note”, significant money-making and trade opportunities, and fall of the oppressive Russian monarchy.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and ruined many of our fleets and military. The decision on what to do to deal with Japan was a tough one. America made the right decision on dropping the atomic bomb on Japan.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neutrality In WW1

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Originally in 1916, Wilson had run for reelection as president on the motto, "He kept us out of war." But advocates of military preparedness argued that the country needed to get ready for eventual involvement in the war. President Wilson then sought to use American might and idealism to alter the war aims of the Allies, by making U.S. intervention based on a "war to make the world safe for democracy." On 2nd of April 1917, Wilson asked Congress for a declaration of war and four days later all but six senators and fifty representatives voted for a war resolution. The Selective Service Act that was passed the following month, along with an extraordinary number of volunteers, built up the army from less than 250,000 to four million over the course of the conflict. The biggest problem the Wilson administration faced was the threat of German submarine warfare. In February 1915, the German government, in consultation with its military leaders, decided to use submarines to wage economic warfare. On May 7, 1915, the British luxury liner Lusitania was sunk without warning by the German submarine U-20. In all, 1,198 passengers died, including 128 Americans. Wilson issued a strong warning to Germany in a series of diplomatic notes. When speaking regarding the actions the United States will take against the U-Boats in the Pacific, Wilson stated, “Therefore there may at any moment come a time when I cannot preserve both the honor and the peace of the United States. Do not exact of me an impossible and contradictory thing.” In February 1917, British intelligence gave the United States government a decoded telegram from Germany that had been intercepted en route to Mexico. Zimmerman Telegram authorized the ambassador to offer Mexico the portions of the Southwest it had lost to the United States in the 1840s if it joined the Central Powers. Wilson did not publicize the interception of the…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays