Presidential Debate Pros And Cons

Presidential Debate Response The final Presidential Debate took a turn for the more civil side as opposed to the previous endeavours involving cordiality and the lack thereof. Egos and insults alike softened in anticipation of reaching the audience as speech moderator, Chris Wallace, discouraged any cheering and booing in accordance to the direct consideration of all in the process of voting. Upon first pretenses, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton did not shake hands and only acknowledge each other's presence once they both starting talking. Their attire was both formal as respectively Clinton’s dress was a bit more feminine from the tradition of having all male presidents. The setup was similar to the first debate as there was a podium for two along with a two minute timer; both of which did not pay much attention to.
Both of the candidate received the same questions that included both the question and a lead in as the determine the individual's opinions. As expected and both anticipated controversial topics upon: abortion, 2nd Amendment rights, immigration, foreign policy, public policy, and economic doctrine was discussed as the formality and decency gradually
There was no new discussions rather than the overall jargon of immigration and jobs with the slight difference of ideas like abortion and court appointments to restore the concept of justice to American families. I do give considerable praise to the moderator as he remained as neutral as can be while still correcting improper behavior quickly and respectfully. Whoever wins shall declare it a pyrrhic victory in the history books and gathered thought alike. Although it may seem like both political parties are completely against each other, there is still a common goal for the wellbeing of the United State of America and can be completed through