Preview

Presidential Immunity: Cases in the Supreme Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Presidential Immunity: Cases in the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has had to rule on issues regarding Presidential immunity in a few cases. Three specifically have helped to set the precedent for how the court would interpret another case brought before the court. In Mississippi v. Johnson the ruling decided whether a president can have an injunction placed on him/her based on the carrying out of their executive duties. Next, in the case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the court ruled on whether a president can be personally sued for decisions they made while in office that violated established law. Lastly, in the case of Jones v. Clinton it was decided if a president could be granted immunity from a civil suit not in relation to his/her office, simply because of the importance of the presidency and the time necessary to dedicate to the job. These three cases involving Presidential immunity have shaped the way a court would interpret a case involving such if faced today. In response to the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 the state of Mississippi brought suit against the President of the United States, Andrew Johnson, claiming that the laws were un-constitutional. The opinion of the court was given by the Chief Justice, and ruled that an injunction against the president could not be made for duties performed by the president within his duties delineated in Article II of the Constitution. In the ruling the court explained the president’s role in this specific case was not ministerial as the state of Mississippi had argued but was rather an act based on his executive and political duties. Quoting Chief Justice Marshall the court explained that an attempt by the judicial branch to oversee such duties would be “an absurd and excessive extravagance.” The opinion further explains that even though the court in this case is not being asked to tell the executive what it must do but rather telling it what it cannot do, the court must not stray from the underlying principle. Thus, the ruling in this case is that the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    McColloch vs. Maryland was a decision constructed by The Supreme Court of the United States. Maryland undertook disrupting an operation of one of the Second Bank of the United States’ branches by striking a tax on all of the banks not authorized by Maryland. The law was identified by the court that Maryland had focused on the United States Bank. The court then allowed the Federal government to pass laws not intended to be for the Constitution’s list of expressed powers. The case that I am referring to as of right now authorized two significant principles in constitutional law. Initially, the constitution stipends implied powers to congress inclining to construct a utilitarian functional government. However, state action could likely…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)). Marbury has a right to this commission due to it being the last act and sealed by the Secretary of State. The Judiciary department job is to say what law is. In this case they have to interpret whether President Jefferson is breaking a law by not allowing Marbury to assume his duties as the Justice of Peace. The Judiciary department will ensure that two laws do not conflict if it does the court will decide the operations of each law. “If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.” (See, e.g. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court For D.C. (03-475) 542 U.S. 367 (2004) 334 F.3d…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    The Executive Realm is split in half. Half of it is political/discretionary that is not subject to judicial review. The other half is a legal duty that is subject to judicial review.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Chief Justice John Marshall, the majority ruled that while Marbury was entitled to receive his commission and that courts are able to grant remedies, the Supreme Court did not have the right to grant the plaintiff his legal order. The reasoning behind this was that Marbury’s request was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court deemed unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789). The Court then stated that when the Constitution and the law conflict, it is the Supreme Court’s duty to uphold the law of the land and rule in unity with the Constitution.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He ruled the provisions of Civil Rights Act of 1875 beyond Congress’s constitutional authority based on Fourteenth Amendment, also known as the State Action doctrine. He argued that the doctrine “does not invest Congress with power to legislate upon subjects which are within the domain of State legislation, but to provide modes of relief against State legislation,” later writing that “an inspection of the law shows that it makes no reference whatever to any supposed or apprehended violation of the Fourteenth Amendment on the part of the States”. This decision is widely criticized for analyzing too literally the language of the amendment and not examining its purpose to ensure blacks equal protection under the law. Throughout Bradley’s opinion, he barely acknowledged the significance of the amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1875 as a means of ensuring all citizens, despite their race, equal rights and treatment by commercial enterprises. He instead “inspected” and searched for loopholes in the language of the Constitution barring Congress from intervening in the actions of the establishments mentioned in the Civil Rights Act of 1875. For example, one of his most crucial arguments maintained that the act’s conference of power upon Congress to prohibit legislation by local businesses and individuals in society was “repugnant of the Tenth Amendment” because it extended Congress’s powers beyond those directly delegated to it by the Constitution. He also made the very specific point that, according to the Constitution and previous Supreme Court cases, no federal legislation could be passed extending Congressional authority unless it acted as a remedy to a state law passed “adverse to the rights of…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    actions to destroy the Bank of the United States by ignoring the ruling of McCulloch vs. Maryland, for refusing to hand over court ordered documentation concerning the bank, and abusing the power of veto.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ch 2 Government Politics

    • 754 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The power of the Supreme Court to declare actions of the other branches of government to be unconstitutional is known as…

    • 754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln exercised discretionary power beyond the limits of the Constitution when he increased the size of both the army and navy in response to the Southern secession that occurred when Congress was out of session. This power is specifically prescribed to Congress in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States. Thus the power to increase the size of the navy and army reside outside of the executive branch in the safe arms of the legislative branch. Abraham Lincoln also exercised discretionary power beyond the limits of the Constitution when he suspended the writ of Habeas Corpus in some states. The suspension of Habeas Corpus is also prescribed not to the executive branch but rather to Congress in Article 1 Section 9 of the Constitution. This suspension of Habeas Corpus like…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of black representation among the government was addressed immediately. However the issue was under jurisdiction of President Andrew Johnson, who was a Southerner and also thought that African Americans shouldn't have a role in Reconstruction, American Historian, Robert Cruden said of Johnson, "His Jacksonian philosophy had perhaps an even greater flaw in view of the problems he confronted: it had some place for the Negro as a free man, but it had none for him as an equal"1. During the Presidential Reconstruction, 1865-1867, Johnson appointed provisional governors and ordered them to call state conventions in order to establish new, all white, governments in the South. These new all white governments looked similar to the confederate governments they had replaced, In an essay by Steven Hahn he said of black representation in the south, "Outside of South Carolina, they show, blacks never dominated either the executive, legislative, or judiciary always remained under white control"2 . Johnson's third annual message to congress in December, 1867 depicted his prejudice, he said of the African Americans that they had, "shown less capacity for government than any other race of people. No independent government of any form has ever been successful in their hands. On the contrary, wherever they have been left to their own devices, they have shown a constant tendency to relapse into barbarism"3. Even though during Reconstruction there were many black people holding both federal and state offices during reconstruction.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Models

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most popular court cases is McCulloch v. Maryland. In 1819 there wasn’t much judicial power because the Supreme Courts were still getting settled in, and the public was still skeptical in weather they could trust them or not. The McCulloch v. Maryland court case was in the Marshall Court. John Marshall was the chief justice at this time and he is the one who made the Supreme Court a serious player in government. Marshall Court had a pattern of expanding national power. “The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland expanded national power in two ways…” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, allowed the national government to the right to create a bank. This decision limited state power by, “denying the states the authority to tax activities of the national government.” (Geer, Schiller, Segal, and Herrara 2016) The decision of the court was justified by their interpretation of the Constitution. “In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the Court ruled that the Bank of the United States was constitutional and that the Maryland tax was unconstitutional. Concerning the power of Congress to charter a bank, the Court turned to the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of its "enumerated powers."” (McBride 2006) This court case is one of the most important because it established the ways the Supreme Court…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the establishment of the American presidency, the office of the executive has gradually grown from a small arm of the president into an expansive set of cabinet departments, executive-appointed agencies, and independent regulatory agencies forming the modern executive bureaucracy. Accompanying this growth in the size of the executive bureaucracy has been the expansion of the prerogative of the executive himself. This extension of the executive’s power can predominantly be explained by the theory of the unitary executive. This idea concerning the power of the executive has been a foundation for the expansion of executive jurisdiction, and has heavily contributed to the evolution and development of the executive power that we know today.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The president had the opportunity to serve a single six year term, and was given no permission on the power of the budget, he and his cabinet would also be awarded seats in Congress. In order to guarantee Southerners their much-desired states’ rights, “the federal government had no right to levy protective tariffs, make international improvements, or over-rule state court decisions. The states had the right to sustain their own armies and enter into separate agreements with one another as well as having the power to amend the constitution. Although there was a requirement for a federal Supreme Court, the southern legislators could never agree on its arrangement or its establishment, so the Confederacy lacked a high court throughout its existence.”#…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Impact

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Let us first examine the area where the Court has had the greatest amount of historical impact, interstate commerce. Article One, Section Eight, Clause Three of the United States Constitution is commonly known as the “Commerce Clause,” and states, “The United States Congress shall have the authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A common topic when discussing executive orders is the constitutionality of the President’s power to use them. It is constitutional since it is the President’s duty to faithfully execute the…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A state legislator in Maryland, John Merryman, was arrested for attempting to stop Union troops from going from Baltimore to Washington. His attorney immediately attempted to use the writ of habeas corpus. This was so the federal court could examine the charges. However, President Abraham Lincoln took the action into his own hands and chose to suspend the right of habeas corpus. Because Lincoln made this decision, the general in command of Fort McHenry refused to turn Merryman over to the authorities. This is extremely controversial because federal judge Roger Taney, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, delivered a ruling that President Lincoln did not have the authority to suspend habeas corpus. However, Lincoln still didn’t respond, appeal, or order the release of Merryman. During a July 4 speech, Lincoln insisted that he had to suspend the writ of habeas corpus in order to stop the rebellion in the South. Because of this ruling, many people pair this with the Emancipation Proclamation because they came around the same time. People consider this proclamation to be unconstitutional, but was a needed act for the time…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays