Preview

Pricing Strategy of Soft Drinks Today

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pricing Strategy of Soft Drinks Today
{draw:g} Table of Contents Soft drink Industry: {text:bookmark-start} Introduction: {text:bookmark-end} We will basically focus on the pricing strategies adopted by these two affluence companies, how the change in the strategy of one of them reflects in the strategy of the other. {text:bookmark-start} Entry barriers in soft drink Market: {text:bookmark-end} The several factors that make it very difficult for the competition to enter the soft drink market include: Network Bottling: Both Coke and PepsiCo have franchisee agreements with their existing bottler’s who have rights in a certain geographic area in perpetuity. These agreements prohibit bottler’s from taking on new competing brands for similar products. Also with the recent consolidation among the bottler’s and the backward integration with both Coke and Pepsi buying significant percent of bottling companies, it is very difficult for a firm entering to find bottler’s willing to distribute their product. The other approach to try and build their bottling plants would be very capital-intensive effort with new efficient plant capital requirements in 2009 being more than $500 million. The advertising and marketing spend in the industry is very high by Coke, Pepsi and their bottler’s. This makes it extremely difficult for an entrant to compete with the incumbents and gain any visibility. Coke and Pepsi have a long history of heavy advertising and this has earned them huge amount of brand equity and loyal customer’s all over the world. This makes it virtually impossible for a new entrant to match this scale in this market place. Retailer Shelf Space (Retail Distribution): Retailers enjoy significant margins of 15-20% on these soft drinks for the shelf space they offer. These margins are quite significant for their bottom-line. This makes it tough for the new entrants to convince retailers to carry/substitute their new products for Coke and Pepsi. To enter into a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi have an agreement with their own bottler who specializes in this field. Moreover, the agreement restrains the bottlers to carry other brand. For instance, Coke bottler could not carry Royal Crown Cola.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Having said that, there is still a point where price is not the issue but taste. Some people swear by the taste in this loyal brand market. These two corporations have concentrated on cultivating brand management through applicable advertising, marketing campaigns. According to Bloomberg BusinessWeek, “Coca-Cola remains the best globally recognized brand across all industries for ages, while PepsiCo’s brand ranked number 26 in year 2008.” PepsiCo has been able differentiate itself from competitors by tapping into other markets like chips and healthy alternative foods. While PepsiCo is known for their soda, their expansion is clear in showing there is a need for other things being non-soda. The time for vitality comes with diversification because there are true signs of a shift in consumption. The decrease in soda consumption raises PepsiCo. has positioned it to continue to remain profitable for its shareholders.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed markets.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke and Pepsi are two big players in the market. The competition in the market has been such in which one company goes ahead with some new product and other company adopts a proactive approach and it comes up with something new that no one takes the advantage, Because of the customer base and the market share they affect the profit of the…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces (Coke Wars)

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The barriers to entry in this market are fairly high. Both Coke and Pepsi have franchising agreements with existing bottling companies. These agreements prohibit the bottler’s from taking on new soft drink companies. This makes it very hard for a new soft drink company to find a bottler willing to distribute their product. Coke and Pepsi have also been able to develop loyal customers through their brand image, which would make it hard for a new soft drink company to find consumers.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke has highly visible spots on top-rated shows like "The Voice" and the Super bowl. Coca Cola gets its brand in front of more people. In the last few years, Pepsi has opted for less traditional campaigns that have not had huge payoffs. Coca Cola is more marketable and more put together as a whole, which allows them to not only sell more products, but make more money on top of that.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn 't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they have tried and have failed numerous times at expanding their product and marketing capabilities. Below is a list of key products offered by both Coca Cola and PepsiCo:…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The barriers are high. They can be up-front advertising, R&D cost, bottling lines equipment, and brand awareness. Firstly, megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share, left fierce competition to the other brands. Secondly, On supply-side economies of scale, the megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share and the larger volumes of products to spread fixed cost over more units. Thirdly, on demand-side benefits of scale, the impact of brand reputation is huge, for customers are more willing to buy products of megabrands. Coke and Pepsi spent $244,000 and $140,000 on average each year in 2008 and 2009,which could be an unaffordable up-front cost for new entrant.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many global brands (such as Coca Cola, PepsiCo, Red Bull, Hansens Natural) with stronger product differentiation, greater distribution channel and brand loyalty. For new entrants, it is difficult to seize market share from these big companies.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rivalry: Revenues are extremely concentrated in this industry, with Coke and Pepsi, together with their…

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economics of the CP and bottling is very different from each other in terms of number and size of rivals, and the scope of competitive rivalry. There are two giants competing head to head on the CP industry, smaller national producers, such as Seven-Up and Dr Pepper, are relatively trivial. There are a lot of players of same size in the bottling industry. Unlike the furious competition between Pepsi and Coke, no sense of competition can be felt in bottling industry. Reasons are that, first, Pepsi and Coke control the majority of bottlers in 1990s; second, intrabrand competition is restricted by the franchise agreement, which is protected by 'Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act'.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coca Cola Wars

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The treat of new entrants is very low because of the high cost associated with the industry which include, marketing a new cola, gaining name recognition, obtaining slotting space and a number of other factors makes for favorable conditions to operate for the incumbents. The rivalry among existing competitors is extremely intense however; it proves to provide benefits for the industry. For instance when Coca Cola introduces a new venture Pepsi may follow or vice versa, essentially offering more products for consumers. The intense rivalry keeps competitors from entering the industry because of the intense price…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economies of scale deter entry by forcing the entrant to come in at a large scale and risk strong reaction from existing firms or come in at a small scale and accept a cost disadvantage. Barriers to entry are high in the soft drink industry because both soft drink companies and bottlers are factors in entering this market. These two parts of the industry are extremely interdependent, sharing costs in procurement, production, marketing and distribution. Many of their functions overlap; for instance, Pepsi can do some bottling, and bottlers conduct many promotional activities. The industry is already…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inbound logistics for the Pepsi and Coca Cola consisted of largely the same operations. Both companies purchase their own ingredients through use of future contracts (to avoid market volatility) and produce their concentrate from their own facilities. Once this is done, these companies send their concentrate out to bottlers upon approval of contract for bottling company. Once the bottling company receives the shipment of concentration, it is diluted to the correct concentration by adding the correct amount of carbonated water, and sugar, and bottled for sale. This is done for two reasons. One reason is so that Pepsi and Coca Cola can maintain their exact mix of ingredients as a well-kept secret, and not let the bottling companies know what exactly goes into their product. This affects the image of the product, and preserves it as something of higher value, and actually applies a sense of prestige to the Pepsi and Coca Cola products that are kept such excellent secrets.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics