Preview

Principle of Utility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
490 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Principle of Utility
1)The Principle of Utility is the belief that when a person has a number of options in a moral situation he should chose the one that results in the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. However, the definition of happiness is up to interpretation. I feel as though people should follow this principle in certain situations. For example, if you are faced with the choice of playing videogames by yourself at home or going out to dinner with your family you should chose the latter because it would make your family members happy if you went to dinner with them as opposed to staying home to play videogames to make yourself happy. This is one example of a time when a person should follow the principle of utility, but there are many times when we should not. For instance, if you have the opportunity to kill a grumpy old man who always bothers everyone in the neighborhood and you did it, it would probably make everyone in your neighborhood happy yet it wouldn’t be right to take the man’s life regardless of how happy people would be if he “went away”. In the end, the circumstances play a large role in deciding whether or not one should follow the principle of utility.

2) I do not think this principle is a good one. While I do think it is important to help others, family and loved ones should come first. People will always consider their family and loved ones before strangers when they make a decision. No matter what all people will have a bias towards a decision that gives their family the most happiness. Even the strictest utilitarian would not kill his mother if it made the rest of the world happy. It is human nature to protect one’s family and I do not think utilitarianism will stop that trend.

5) I like the idea that people should make decisions to try and make the greatest number of people happy, but to a point. I think in everyday life you should try and make others happy as well as yourself through the decisions you make

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism or the greatest happiness principle, is mainly characterized by happiness and consequentialism. The measure of good and evil is balanced between individual 's happiness and the happiness of the community. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013) If you treat others how you wish to be treated, you are acting in the greater good for the most amounts of people, and in doing so, you are acting with morals. To act selfishly, you are acting morally wrong. This theory relies on producing the greatest amount of happiness. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013)…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another objection raised by Srinivasan will be by worrying about the world while your loved one is in need without the help of anyone will not make us happy. As the Utilitarian want everyone to think like them and care for others and their happiness. We are normal people who cannot be forced to anything that we don’t want. For instance, If the utilitarian suggest we donate to Donald Trump’s funds because that money goes to affected areas. And If I was an immigrant from the middle east or South Africa, I would not donate to Trump’s funds for many reasons. One, he only cares about the American people then why should my money goes to them when I can give it to charities back in my country in the middle east or Africa. Two, with the donation the funds can become so stronger that can create more racism and kick me out from the US. We have our own personal identity and loyalties. People will always be loyal to the people that are always there for…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarian ethics is the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its utility in providing happiness or pleasure as summed among all sentient beings. In laymen’s terms it means that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome or the greater good for the greatest amount of people. When I was doing my research into utilitarian ethics, I discovered there are many different types of utilitarian ethics, rule utilitarianism, act utilitarianism, two-level utilitarianism, motive utilitarianism, negative utilitarianism, average utilitarianism, and total utilitarianism. Although there are a lot of different types of utilitarian ethics, I will look at this problem using rule and act utilitarian.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that believes one should do what will promote the greatest utility for as many people as possible, that utility is often considered to be happiness or pleasure. There are different kinds of utilitarian views; hedonistic, preference, rule, and act to name a few, but they all have the same main objective. This theory does indeed seem good at first, but it is flawed. The case of the lonesome stranger challenges utilitarianism by bringing up issues of justice in different kinds of utilitarianism. The lonesome stranger is a persuasive argument to utilitarianism, showing problems pertaining to justice.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can say that I am a utilitarian based on some references. I do care a lot for other people’s happiness, and I really appreciate to let the people who stay around me to be happy. For example, I had a complicated relationship with my boyfriend when I was in year 1 at my university. We really love each other, yet it was getting worse and worse after my mother knew about our relationship. She blamed me for having a boyfriend without telling her and letting her decide who can be my partner in the future. She seemed to be unhappy as well as my parents, so I decided to quit my relationship with the one whom I love the most. I decided to do that since I want my mother to be happy and my whole family. Even though there are two people in this problem who cannot get happiness still there are more than two people who can be happy. The decision of choosing family should be right. As I am a Cambodian child, I have the authority to listen to what my family say is good or bad. However, I have to follow what my families tell me to do; I still have the right to think what is good and what is bad. For this problem, I know that I am wrong since I have a boyfriend in the early age.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, utilitarianism allows for the good of all. Mills wrote, "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Because morality is based on the greatest pleasure the more people who benefit from an act, the more…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism in its simplest form distinguishes the difference between right and wrong by asserting that what is right is any action of good that will positively affect the common welfare of all. In short, the principle of utility implies that what is good is whatever promotes the greatest amount of happiness. This implies that the happiness of one individual is not as relevant or important as the happiness of a multitude of persons, or that the value of life can be measured in numbers and not by specific individuals. The general idea is that if five people are saved as compared to saving one life, then there is more happiness being created and as a result more good is being created.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultilitarianism

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    But this brings up an issue: most of morality is considered partial. It makes sense to care more about your children, family, and friends than complete strangers, but utilitarianism rejects this. If giving money, time, etc. to total strangers while “sacrificing the important needs of friends and family” results in the least amount harm than you are morally obligated to do so. We need to count everyone’s well being and interests equally. But this could lead to disastrous results. What if a majority of society benefits from an atrocity such as slavery? Utilitarianism would require us to allow it even if everyone’s interests were equally, since there would be a large amount of ‘benefit.’…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism can be classified in two distinct ways, act and rule. In these ways the utility principle is applied differently. Act-Utilitarianism is concerned with treating each moral situation as unique; therefore, applied the utility principle to each act. The Fundamentals of Ethics states, “Rule-utilitarianism is the version of rule consequentialism that says that well-being is the only thing of intrinsic value” (Shafer-Landau, Russ G-6). This means rule-utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utility principle. Furthermore, rules are right if they produce greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rule utilitarians would ask the question ‘what if everyone did that?’ (MacKinnon and Fiala) and apply the principle to assess the practice. Then, when evaluating if the action is justified, they would see if it follows the rule or practice that generates the maximum happiness (Nathanson). To get a better understanding of how each of the two versions assesses actions differently, three different situations have been described below along with an explanation of what act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism suggest the proper course of action should…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays