Prisoner Reentry Sociology

Review of Literature
The annual review of sociology describes prisoner reentry as “the process of leaving prison and return into free society” (Visher & Travis, 2003). Generally speaking, it is the course of action in which an offender is set free from incarceration and allowed back into society. Transition reentry is the procedure in which inmates are liberated from confinement and let back out into the public. To put it another way, inmates are freed from imprisonment and given another opportunity in free society. In like manner, offenders are discharged of internment and set back into humanity. Again prisoner reintegration is the procedure which inmates are set out from custody and allowed to come back into the community. Therefore, prisoner
reentry is the step in which inmates are let go freely from solitary confinement and placed back out into civilization. A thesis conducted by Anna Wilson denotes that “reentry starts prior to release and continues well afterwards” (Wilson, 2008).
Transition reentry begins way before that inmate has been released from imprisonment till thereafter. In the same fashion, prisoner reentry is an ongoing event that takes place at the start of liberation and later after. To put it in another way prisoner reintegration is a continuous process that happens at the start of that offender being let out of confinement and well after. With that being said, prisoner reintegration is a rolling procedure that occurs before that inmate is set free following them even after they are placed back out in society. Thus, this process takes place not at one time but over the duration of time right before and after the release of an offender from
incarceration.
In the article called The Offender and Reentry: Supporting Active Participation in Reintegration states that “reentry is a three stage process: institutional, structured reentry, and integrate” (Taxman, 2004).
Assuredly prisoner reentry is a three stage process. The following method utilizes correctional supervision in all three stages. The reentry process employs the facility in which that inmate resides, the program the inmate goes through and the community that inmate is brought back into to. The institutional stage is when that offender has just about six months left in confinement. The structured is the six month period and thirty days after. Whereas in the integrate stage is thirty-one days plus after that offender has been released and set free. Although each stage of the process shares equal importance the most crucial stages that occur within prisoner reentry is the second and the final stage. The second stage also known as the structured stage, is the span in which an inmate partakes in community based correction. To put it differently, this stage is when offenders do handiwork communities under correctional administration. For instance, offenders clean up walkways, paint building etc. Alternatively, the integrate stage is usually reckoned as either being put on parole or probation. It is the duration when the inmate is freed from imprisonment and placed back into free society but still under minimum correctional supervision. An example of this stage is when that
individual is only obligated to check in with those parole or probation officers once or twice a month and either takes a drug test or have a mandatory curfew. Accordingly, the process involves three phases of prisoner reentry.
The journal New Era in Inmate Reentry states that “the major goals of prisoner reentry strategies are to promote public safety by reducing recidivism and to reintegrate inmates by promoting positive interactions upon their release” (Travis, Crayton, & Mukamal, 2009). The utmost intent of prisoner reentry practices are to advance the welfare of the general public by suppressing offenders from re committing a crime also to restore prisoners by bolstering constructive communication just about the time of their discharge. In other words, the paramount objective of the transition reentry process is to encourage safety awareness in the public by diminishing criminals from reoffending and rejuvenate criminals by endorsing effective cooperation at the time of their liberation. Basically stating, the most considerable desire of prisoner reentry procedures are to aid public safety by minimizing recidivism along with improving offenders by developing beneficial synergy right upon there are let out of imprisonment. To put it in another way, the substantial aim for transition reentry strategies are to advocate public safety by bringing down recidivism rates and to reestablish inmates by advancing practical interplay right at the time they are freed from custody. So, the vital role of prisoner reintegration techniques are to further safety awareness by shrinking the probability of an offenders going back out into free society reoffending as well as reinvigorate criminals by promoting reasonable communication upon their release from being incarcerated.
Author Faye Taxman explains how “a transition process is needed that address both the survival needs and skill based services” (Taxman, 2004). The transition process is necessary to focus on since it is both relic to offenders needs and aptitudes. A transition process is beneficial to essay both endurance and competency. To state it differently, the transition process is all all-important to address both an individual’s capabilities and their survival means. It is imperative to set ones sight on the transition process for it is a continuation needs and understanding. Indeed, it is fundamental to contemplate on the transition process for is serves a purposeful means to durability needs and resourcefulness of those individuals.