Preview

Privatization in Nepal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
30939 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Privatization in Nepal
University of Sunderland
IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIVATIZATION POLICY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY FROM NEPAL; SUCCESS OR FAILURE
By

Raj Kumar Maharjan (Registration Number: 059991668)

This paper was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Business Administration (MBA) degree at University of Sunderland, School of Business, Graduate Business Program, Sunderland, U.K.

January 2010

A MASTER’S PROJECT IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

BY RAJ KUMAR MAHARJAN REGISTRATION NUMBER: 059991668

“SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTERS OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) DEGREE” SUNDERLAND UNIVERSITY

APPROVED BY: ………………………. MR. CHRIS MARSHALL ITGM02 Module Leader Sunderland University.

DATE OF APPROVAL:

SUNDERLAND BUSINESS SCHOOL DISSERTATION DECLARATION. MBA

Statement of Originality and Authenticity I confirm that the dissertation I am submitting is an original and authentic piece of work written by myself that satisfies the University rules and regulations with respect to Plagiarism and Collusion. I further confirm that I have fully referenced and acknowledged all material incorporated as secondary resources in accordance with the Harvard system. I also certify that I have taken a copy of dissertation, which I will retain until the Board of Examiners has published the results, and which I will make available on request in pursuance of any appropriate aspect of the marking and moderation of the work within the University regulations.

Name: Raj Kumar Maharjan Registration Number: 059991668 Course: PGBM31 Date: 19th January 2010

Signed ………………………

Supervisors Signature ……………………

Date ……………………….

Table of Contents
List of Tables List of Figure List of boxes Abbreviations Acknowledgement iv iv iv v vii

Abstracts Chapter One 1.0 1.1 Introduction Privatization: History of Nepal 1.1.1 1.2 Privatization Process in Nepal

1 2-7 2 3 3 4 4 5 7 8-20 8 10 10 11 12 13 15 17 18 18 19 20 i

Aims and



References: Abu Shair, A.R, (1997), Privatization and Development, St.Martin’s Press Inc, New York. Adam, C, William, C and Percy S. Mistry (1992), “Adjusting Privatization, Case Studies from Developing Countries”. London: James Currey. Adam, S. (1776), An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Methusen and Co. Ltd, London. Aghion, P. and Schankerman, M. (1999), “Competition, Entry and the Social Returns to Infrastructure in Transition Economics”, Centre of Economic Policy Research. DP 2052, London. Adhikari Ratnakar and Kamalesh Adhikari (2000), “Privatization: Expectation and Reality”. Kathmandu: Forum for Protection of Public Interest (Pro-Public). Ajzen,I, I (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 50, pp 135-211. Barnnett, M., (2000), “Evidence on the Fiscal and Macroeconomic: Impact of Privatization”, IMF Working Paper, July IMF, Washington DC. Barret, S. and Colin, F. (1981), Policy and Section Essays on Implementation of Public Policy (1st Edition), Mathuen Publication, London. Barret, S. M. (2004), “Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 years of Implementation studies”. Public Administration, 82 (2) 2004 page 249-262. Berg, A. and Berg, E. (1997), “Methods of Privatization”, International Affairs, Vol. 50, No.2, Page 357-390. Boubakari, N and Cosset, J. (1999), “Does Privatization meet the Expectations? Evidence from African Countries. Plenary on Privatization and Corporate Governance. African Economic Research, Consortium Biannual Research, Nairobi, Kenya. Buchanan, J. (1972), The Theory of Public Choice, University of Michigan Press, Arbor. Business Age (2000), “Assessing Privatization,” Vol. 2, No. 2, January 2000. Kathmandu, Nepal. Business Age (2000), “Privatization Process in Nepal”, Vol. 2, No. 3, February 2000. Kathmandu, Nepal. Castro, A.V. (2005), “Privatization and Democracy in Venezuela, Latin America Perspectives”, available online at www.sagepublication.com, accesses on 20 December 2008. Collins, J. &Hussey, R (2003), Business Research, (3rd Edition), Pal Grave, MacMillan Publication. Cook, P. and Kirkpatrick, C, (2003), Handbook of Privatization (1st Edition), International Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. Cook, P. and Uchinda, Y. (2003), “Privatization and Economic Growth in Developing Countries”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol.39, No, 6, Page 121-154 Creswell, John W. (1994), Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi, SAGE Publications. Daley, D (1996), “The Politics and Administration of Privatization”, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 24, no.4: 629-31. Duron, R.R. (1994), “Privatization in Latin America: One Step in an Ongoing Global Process”, in Meredith M. Brown and Giles Ridley, Privatization: Current /issues, Page 1-5, London. Eduardo, L. and Ugo, P. (2002), “Structural Reforms in Latin America Under Scrutiny: Reforming Reforms, Annual Meetings of the Board Governors, Inter American Development Bank, Fortaleza, Brazil. Fontana, A. & Frey, J.H, The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text: 97 Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Edition), London: Saga Publication. Galiani, S. (2005), “Water for Life, The Impact of Privatization on Welfare Services on Child Morality”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 113, No. 1, Page 83-120. Geddes, B. (1994), Politician’s Dilemma: Reforming the State in Latin America, Series on Social Choice and Political Economy, University of California Press, Berkeley. Grindle M.S and Thomas, J.W. (1990), “After the Decision: Implementing Policy Reforms in Developing Countries”. World Development, Vol.18, No. 8 Page .1163-1181. GTZ (2004), “Avoiding Corruption in Privatization, A Practical Guide”. Eschborn: GTZ available on http://www.u4.no/document/literature/gtzcorruptionandprivatization.pdf accessed on 23 October2007. Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R.R. (1995), The Challenges of Consolidation, Economic Reform and Democracy, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Hanke, S.H. (1987), Privatization and Development, Carlifornia Institute for Contemporary Studies Press. Hill, Heather C: (2003), “Understanding Implementation: Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Resources for Reform”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 13, no. 3 pp.265-282. HMG/N (1989)/ (2005), Various Issues of Targets and Performances of Public Enterprises (FY 1989/90)/ (FY 2005/2006). Kathmandu: Ministry of Finance. Hausman, D and McPherson, M. (1994), “Preference, Belief, and Welfare”, American Economic Review, Vol.84, No.2, Page 396-405. Hodge, G.A. (2000), Privatization: An International Review of Performance, (1st Edition) West view Company, Boulder. Hussey, J & Hussey, R. (1997), Business Research, London: MacMillan Press. Kelly, J. (1996), “One Piece of Larger Puzzle: The Privatization of VIASA PP 241-277, Wint A.G, (1996) Privatization Monopolicies: Lessons from the Telecommunication and Transport Sectors in Latin America, pp 49-71 Laffont, J.J, and Tirole, J. (1991), “Privatization and Incentives”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, Page 84-105. Lane, J.E., (1995), The Public Sector, Concepts, Models and Approaches, Newbury Park, SAGE Lieberman, I. W., (1993), Privatization the Theme of 1990’s, An Overview. The Columbia Press. Majone, B. and Wildavsky, A. (1988), The Ne Politics of a Budgetary Process, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Majumdar, S.K. (2008), “Why Privatization? The Decline of Public Ownership in India and Its Impact on Industrial Performance”, South Asia Economic Journal Vol. 9 page 293, Available online: http://www.sae.sagepub.com/cgi/content.abstract/9/2/293. Manandhar, N. (1998), “Improving Public Enterprises Performance, An Empirical Study of Behavior and Performance of Public Enterprises in Nepal”. An unpublished PhD dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Commerce and Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Mazmanian, D. and Sabatier, P. (1983),”Conditions of Successful Policy Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives”, Policy Analysis, Vol. 5, fall. Page 481-504. McKenzie, D and Mookherjee, D. (2002),” Distributive Impact of Privatization in Latin America: An Overview of Evidence from Four Countries”, Inter American Bank Research Project. Megginson, W.L. (2005), The Financial Economics of Privatization. Oxford University Press, Oxford Miller, R, Acton, C, Fullerton, D &Malthy, J (2000), SPSS, Social Scientist: Cover Version 9, 10 and 11, Pal Grave MacMillan Publication. Ministry of Finance (MoF) (1999), “Monitoring Privatized Enterprise, A Report on Performance of Privatized Enterprises”. Privatization Cell, MoF. 98 Narain, Laxmi (2003), Public Enterprises Management and Privatization, 4th edition S. Chand Publication, New Delhi. Nellis, J. (1994), “Is Privatization Necessary? Public Policy for the Private Sector, Fpd Note, No.7, World Bank, Washington DC. Nelson, J.H (1990), Economic Crisis and Policy Choices: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, US. Papadopoulos, I. (1995), “Analysis of Functional and Dysfunctions of Direct Democracy: Top Down and Bottom Up Perspectives”, Politics and Socity, Vol. 23, Page 421-448. Paudel, H. (2005), “The Implementation of Privatization Policy in Nepal. Is Privatization a Viable Policy Option?” An Unpublished MPhil Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen, Norway. Plane, P. (1997), “Privatization and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation from a Sample of Developing Market Economics”, Applied Economics, Vol. 29, No. 2, Page 161-179. Pressman, J. and Wildavsky, A. (1984), Implementation: The Oakland Project (3rd edition), University of California Press, Berkeley. Ramamurti, R. (1992), “Then Impact of Privatization on the Latin America Debt Problem”, Journal of International Studies and World Affairs. Vol. 23, Page 93-255. Reejal, Pushkar Raj (1998), “Privatization of Public Enterprises in Nepal”, A Journal of Public Affairs Management Year 4, Volume 6&7. PAAN. Kathmandu. Savas, E. S. (2000), Privatization and Public Private Partnerships. Chatham House Publishers. Sen. A. (1994), “Rationality and Social Choice”, An American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 1, Page 1-24. Shirley, M. and Walsh, P. (2001), “Public vs. Private Ownership: The current State of the Debate”, World Bank Policy Research, working paper No. 2420, Washington DC Shrestha, Pradeep K. (2000), “Nepal’s Lessons From Privatization”, Business Age Vol. 2, No. 2, January 2000. Kathmandu, Nepal Starr, P. (1998), “The Meaning of Privatization”, Yale Law and Policy Review, Vol. 6, No.1, Page 6-41 Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1992), “Some Theoretical Aspects of the Privatization: Applications to Eastern Europe” available on www.nber.org/papers/r1749.pdf assessed on 3 Nov.2008. The World Bank (1996), “Structural Adjustment in Nepal.” Available on http://Inweb18.worldbank.org/oed.oeddoclib.nsf/DocUNIDViewForJavaSearch/5992D15BFBBC B41E852567F5005D8D57 open document accessed on 28 Sep.2008. Thompson, J. (2006~), “ The Federal Civil Service: The Demise of an Institution”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 4, Page 496-504. UNDP (1990), “Guidelines on Privatization”. UNDP UNESCAP, (1999), “Privatization in Less Developed Countries: Problems and Recommendations.” A Paper Presented to the national Workshop on Private Sector Development, Privatization and Deregulation in Nepal: Lessons from ASEAN Experiences Held in Kathmandu on 4-5 Feb. 1999. Van Meter, Donald S. and Carl E. Van Horn, (1975), “The Policy Implementation Process. A Conceptual Framework”. Administration and Society Vol. 6, No.4, Feb. Vickers, John and George Yarrow (1988), Privatization: An Economic Analysis. The MIT Press. Wallsten, S.J, (2001), “An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization and Regulation in Africa and Latin America”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 59, No. 1, Page 1-19. Villalonga, B and Cuervo, A. (2000), “Explaining the Variance in the Performance Effects of Privatization”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 3, Page 581-594. 99 Williams, Walter et al. (1982), Studying Implementation Methodological and Administrative Issues. Chatham House Publishers, Inc. Vernon- Wortzel, H. and Wortzel H.L, (1989), “Privatization not the only answer”, World Development Vol. 15, No. 5, Page 633-641. Yin, R.K (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (2nd Edition), Newbury Park: Saga. Yoder, R., Borkholder, P, and Friesen B.D., (1991), “Privatization and Development: An Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 25, No.3, Page 425-434. 100

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When government contract with private companies to perform what was once considered to be the traditional work of government, it is termed as privatisation. Privatisation is occurring at a rather impressive speed in United States. For example, there are over 100 privatised prisons in the country (Kissane, 2007). Other forms of privatisation occurring in United States include privatisation of schools, military plane maintenance, state welfare and employment agencies and hospitals. Privatisation has become a very controversial topic in the country due to its wide range of advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privatization In Canada

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In other words, when private sectors cannot keep up with demand, or are not able to make deliveries of goods and services, this is when the government will step in to assistance and provide aid. On the contrary, the government will only provide services as long as it benefits citizens. This means that services will only be provided by the government when these services are in of revaluation, high in demand or government assistance is needed, there for services sometimes alter between statuses. Throughout this essay the terms public service and private service sectors will be examined, clearly defined and discussed. Privatization in Canada will also be inspected, and the question of when it is appropriate to privatize public services will be answered with support. The type of services which citizens should have access to will also be clarified and public interest will also be explored. Therefore, this essay will argue that Canadian businesses and corporations should be public sector services when the main function of the businesses are to serve citizens with essential services and goods, whereas self-sufficient businesses and corporations which have mainly profit in mind should be privatized for the good of Canadian…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, I agree that privatization can be seen as a cure for bad government, though the term bad may not be the finest adjective, I would instead use inefficient or ineffective. According to lecture one, government failure is a primary rationale for municipalities to contract out, not because it’s a bad government, but because they were ineffective or inefficient from multiples reasons (Smith, Lecture 1, 2016). Furthermore, the rationales for contracting out say nothing about bad government, the rationales for contracting deal with efficiency and effectiveness such as: cost savings, need for skilled staff, quality improvement, flexibility and political support (Smith, Practical Rationales for Contracting Out, 2016). Additionally, according to DeHoog, the advocates of contracting out argue that the privatization of services will enable to government to save money through the removal of waste through true cost, economies of scale, reduction of high personal cost and greater flexibility. These rationales are similar to rationales given in lecture eight and deal not with bad governance, but with ineffective or inefficient results (DeHoog,…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Bennett, John, Saul Estrin, James Maw, and Giovanni Urga. Privatisation Methods and Economic Growth in Transition Economies. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2004.…

    • 19418 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many studies have showed that the private sector excels in using better technology to solve problems. On the other hand many of the government agencies for the most part rely on outdated technology and do not like to take risks to address those problems. Furthermore, for many people in the public sector such as health care workers privatization come with a high price, it threatens jobs security, pay, benefits, working conditions as well as career opportunities. Privatization also affects the public when it comes to public services, it means less quality, less access to health care and…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pettinger, T. (2011) “Advantages and Problems of Privatization”, Economics Help, 12th May. Available at: http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/501/economics/advantages-of-privatisation// (Accessed: 17 October 2014).…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The paper briefly reviews cases in France, Great Britain and Argentina, then examines the case of California in more depth, and shows how equity concerns are constructed differently in these various settings. After discussing the pricing and regulatory implications of privatization from an equity standpoint, the paper concludes with some directions for further research. Introduction The role of government in the provision of infrastructure goods and services has changed dramatically, in both industrialized and developing countries, over the past two decades.…

    • 14740 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    GOP Pakistan Labor Gazette (1995). Report of July 1994 to June 1995, Ministry of Labor, Government of Pakistan.…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Privatisation in India

    • 5809 Words
    • 24 Pages

    The proposed research is intended to survey the process of privatization in Indiaand assess its impact on the Indian economy. The central issue we will address isthe impact of privatization that has taken place so far on profitability andperformance of PSUs. Going beyond this, we will attempt to understand whatexplains the impact of privatization on performance. Is it the use of market powerby oligopolistic firms whose pricing power had been constrained under governmentownership ? Is performance bought at the expense of labour through extensive lay-offs so that what we see is essentially a transfer from workers to shareholders ? Orare we confusing the impact of privatization with the more generalised impact ofderegulation in the economy, which in itself could spur efficiency ?…

    • 5809 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interview Questionnaire

    • 10373 Words
    • 42 Pages

    This phenomenon of privatisation can be linked to a revolution or boon. Privatisation techniques have already been tried in countries like Great Britain, China, United States, Turkey, Brazil, Mexico, & Japan. In our country to a beginning towards privatisation has been made with the sale of upto 20% of the equity capital of 30 plus select public sector units (psu’s), first to mutual funds and financial institutions and later to the investing public.…

    • 10373 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2 Kozarzewski Piotr. Center for Social and Economic Research. Case Study. “Privatization in the Context of Post-Communist Transition: The Case of Poland.” Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Science.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World Bank Report

    • 16323 Words
    • 66 Pages

    policy and institutional reforms. Section 5 sketches operational implications. Subsequent chapters set out the facts about growth in more detail, and then examine the main areas in which economic and institutional reforms concentrated during the 1990s—macroeconomic stabilization, trade, financial sector, privatization and deregulation, modernization of the public sector, and political reforms. The chapters aim to draw lessons from gaps between expectations and outcomes. Most chapters are…

    • 16323 Words
    • 66 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gd Topics

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    well in your GD and increase your chances of selection. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The current state of our Education System. Is Naxalism the biggest threat to national security? Budget 2012:…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Privatization initiatives are now a current occurrence in most Caribbean countries such as Belize, Jamaica, and Trinidad & Guyana to name a few. It has shown that most privatization activities took place in Latin America & the Caribbean; between the period 1988 and 1993 this region accounted for more than half the total privatizations in the Third World. Most privatization initiatives take place in the utility companies of the Caribbean. In case of Belize (electricity, water, port authority and the sugar cane factory). Government in many of these Lesser Developed Countries embraces privatization as an attachment to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. These institutions stress and maintain that privatization is the main driving force towards economic liberalization and self-sustained growth.…

    • 3095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays