Preview

Pro Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pro Death Penalty
Life in prison is not a punishment. Not for people guilty of violent murders. They have access to way to many comforts that they do not deserve. When criminals kill, they lose their own rights. They are subjected to whatever punishment that crime is worthy of. In cases of heinous crimes or multiple murders is a life sentence enough? No. Will it guarantee they won't kill again? No. Only the Death Penalty can assure that.
My own brother, Peter, was killed seven years ago when he went out to lunch to celebrate his wife's pregnancy. There was a shootout at the diner he was eating at, and he was murdered along with seven other innocent, unknowing people. The killer, however, got away with his life. Five years later they found the guy and he was sentenced to life without parole. Peter was only 24, and he was the most amazing person
I have ever known. The fact that the killer continues to live is a slap in the face to my family.
Peter deserves justice. So do the seven other people murdered along with him. So does any other helpless murder victim that didn't get the justice they needed.
Do you think that the victim's family really wants to keep going time after time to the parole board, begging the board to not grant early parole to the criminals in question? And even with life without parole, there's always some risk of early release (such as overcrowding). The death penalty would not allow that cycle to begin, and taxpayers would have one less criminal to support with taxpayer dollars. I understand that the death penalty can't always be granted, but when it can be, it should be selected to give taxpayers, families, and
victim's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The debate on the pros and cons of the death penalty has gone on for decades. There are some people who oppose the death penalty because they fell it is a system that is so flawed that it serves no purpose. For instance, those against the death penalty believe that this sentence has the potential for an error because it is possible that the wrong person can be executed. Unfortunately, there is no way for those who decide who is guilty to always be 100 percent accurate.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saboteur

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion he went a little over board because innocent people were hurt and even killed. He suffered two days and that doesn’t equal the life of anyone. He should have done the legitimate process through the legal system.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Murder is one of the crimes that can be applied for the death penalty.A Lot of people probably think that if someone were to murder someone they deserve the death penalty.However I believe they deserve to suffer in prison and live in a cell and think for every hour of the day about what they did.In my opinion if they get the death penalty that is the easy way out.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don’t feel anyone should receive a lengthy prison sentence. On the other hand I do believe in the Death Penalty. You’re either a waste to society or we should be doing something to make you more presentable in society. Life without Parole should be off the books as far as I’m concerned. Its cruel and usual treatment. Three violent crimes or two a jay walking, I’m sorry but I haven’t heard of Ted Bundy reoffending. Or even of Mason family members being considered seriously for parole. So how is someone who commits not 1 not 2 but 3 heinous crimes given an opportunity? And the few murderers who were released in the late 80s early 90s to have bought on our tough on criminals actions, would they have ever seen a 3rd? Or was their 2nd always have been life anyway? Psychology and Law Tredoux, Foster, and Alfred…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Death Penalty

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Life without parole, on the books in most states, also prevents reoffending. It means what it says, and spending the rest of your life locked up, knowing you’ll never be free, is no picnic. Two big advantages:…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keaton Capital Punishment

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the death penalty pushes discipline and severe consequences for the crimes that have been committed, life in prison is more humane and less expensive. Many victims feel that the death penalty can give them closure, knowing that the culprit is dead. When we convict someone of a crime, it is not right to kill them. Prison could change them. If you do not use the death penalty, their families could still visit and maintain a relationship with them.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty uses an unnecessary amount of America’s budget. The amount of money we spend on the death penalty could be put to better use. “Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 more than an ordinary…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my perspective the death penalty does not reach the minds of most criminals because a criminal rarely believes he/she could be caught. They hold a belief that they are intelligent enough to outsmart authorities. There is other whom holds such anger towards certain crimes that they believe death is a rightful punishment, but death does not “undo” a crime they have committed. I think it would be better for a criminal to think and reminisce their conscious. Their death would only put peace in their state of mind and except them from the punishments that prison holds for them. Families harmed by these criminals are sometimes frightened by the thought that they’re persecutor could escape and harm them again, however someone sentenced to life in parole in the united states has never escaped or been released. There is also a possibility that an innocent person could be convicted of a crime they did not commit, even with all our new technology and DNA testing there is always a chance of making a…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I will be the first to admit that there are people in this world that has done some pretty terrible things. Maybe to themselves or to other people! Even though those people may have no remorse over the things they have done us as human beings have to be the ones to say when enough is enough. The history of the death penalty is a long and brutal one. From the stoning and crucifixion killings of the B.C. era to today’s methods of the electric chair and lethal injection, governments of one kind or another have sentenced people to death for thousands of years [CA Innocence Project, 2009]. It’s simply a disciplinary act that needs to be eliminated. Wouldn’t it be more efficient for Guilty people to sit in jail and live with what they have committed? To think about what they have done day in and day out, to have the world judge them and to know that family and friends has shunned them from their lives, because of the things that they have done in the past. They may not get over it today, maybe not even tomorrow but after a life time of sitting in the jail with nothing and no one, they are more than likely to “break down” and feel the guilt sooner or later. They would not be human if they didn’t, to have to grow old and sit in prison knowing that you won’t ever be able to leave or see sunlight ever again. Knowing that no one’s going to help you, and knowing that that is where you are going to die would be a terrible feeling.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These obstacles make it almost impossible for the death penalty to ever be carried out. Typically, death row inmates end up dying due to other factors such as health complications rather than being put to death (Petersen & Lynch, 2012, p. 1270). Essentially sentencing someone to death, and placing them on death row is basically the same as a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The difference, however is that the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole carries a significantly smaller price tag for tax payers. Furthermore, with violence rampant in prisons across the nation life in prison without the possibility of parole is not exactly living a comfortable life.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life In Jail

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases". The process before being executed is much longer. In fact "Some prisoners have been on death row for well over 20 years"(Death penalty.org, 2008). This time on death row can vary, but usually it is more then 10 years (Death penalty.org, 2008). During that time of waiting on death row more and more money is being spent looking into the case to make sure everything is perfect and correct information is there. The amount of money spent on the person that is getting executed is over thousands more by the time the process is done. Executions cost "$2 million per person vs. $500,000 for life in prison without parole. If the death penalty was replaced with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, which costs millions less, more money, could go for things citizen really need. In fact; "the money saved could be spent on programs that actually improve the communities in which we live"(Death penalty, 2008). There are so many good things we could use the extra millions of dollars on including "education, roads, police officers and public safety programs, after-school programs, drug and alcohol treatment, child abuse prevention programs, mental health services, and services for crime victims and their families". All of this should be way more important in the grand schema of things. The state of California alone "could save $1 billion over five years by replacing the death penalty with permanent imprisonment." Having regular prisoners is so much cheaper. "California taxpayers pay $90,000 more per death row prisoner each year than on prisoners in regular…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By life sentence criminals have to spend all their life in prison and there is no way for them to go outside of a prison. By spending all life in prison, they have a lot of time to think what they did wrong and that what they did they should never done that. Article "Moussaoui Sentenced to Life in Prison" says "Because the jury did not reached a unanimous decision to give Moussaoui the death penalty, he received life in prison without change of parole" (ABC-Clio). Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. Now he will spend the rest of his life in a super-maximum security prison in Colorado. People think that by those life sentence prison works well because criminals have to spend all their life in prison and that there is no way that they will do any crime…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays