Pro Life And Abortion Analysis
The idea has of abortion has been around since people figured out how babies have come to be, and there always has been two sides the recently coined terms Pro-Life and Pro-Choice. The Pro-Lifers believe that the unborn fetuses have as much rights as a born child and that to terminate the pregnancy would be the same as murdering a person outside the womb. The Pro-Choicers believe it is up to the individual person to make the decision whether to continue the pregnancy or terminate. They may not personally believe in abortion, but they feel it is not their place to decide what a woman should do with her body.
In 2013, HB2 was proposed in Texas. This law increased the criteria for abortion clinics. This included the need for the clinic to be …show more content…
In sociology, this idea is called the sociological imagination. People on either sides see the other as misinformed, evil, or without proper values, but if they were to set aside their beliefs for a little while and see where the other side is coming from they could come to compromise, or all shift to one side or the other. The main fuel for this debate is fear and uncertainty of what these decisions will cause in the future. For Pro-Lifers, they think people with start killing discriminately, eliminating out undesirable genes and selecting sexes like they do in China and India. The same argument was used for allowing gays to marry; people feared that if they were allowed to marry that what stopping people from marrying animals or minors. It is still early for the gay marriage thing to pan out, but as of right now, sixty-year-old men are not arguing for the right to marry their eight-year-old girlfriend. For Pro-Choicers, they fear eliminating the choice will push women to finding unsafe ways to end pregnancies such as back-door abortions or coat hanger abortions. A person could, also, jump in the shoes of someone from every part of this debate: a woman who regrets her decision, a woman who went through back door abortion, a health care provider that administers abortion, or even someone who is devout Christian, just to see why they think the way they
In 2013, HB2 was proposed in Texas. This law increased the criteria for abortion clinics. This included the need for the clinic to be …show more content…
In sociology, this idea is called the sociological imagination. People on either sides see the other as misinformed, evil, or without proper values, but if they were to set aside their beliefs for a little while and see where the other side is coming from they could come to compromise, or all shift to one side or the other. The main fuel for this debate is fear and uncertainty of what these decisions will cause in the future. For Pro-Lifers, they think people with start killing discriminately, eliminating out undesirable genes and selecting sexes like they do in China and India. The same argument was used for allowing gays to marry; people feared that if they were allowed to marry that what stopping people from marrying animals or minors. It is still early for the gay marriage thing to pan out, but as of right now, sixty-year-old men are not arguing for the right to marry their eight-year-old girlfriend. For Pro-Choicers, they fear eliminating the choice will push women to finding unsafe ways to end pregnancies such as back-door abortions or coat hanger abortions. A person could, also, jump in the shoes of someone from every part of this debate: a woman who regrets her decision, a woman who went through back door abortion, a health care provider that administers abortion, or even someone who is devout Christian, just to see why they think the way they