“A famine means that a significant part of the population has no access to basic food, suffers from severe malnutrition, and death from hunger reaches unprecedented levels” (Chima 5). In order to solve this problem, we could set up safety nets through government spending that help people have enough money to buy foods (Sanchez 25). Famine can be caused by factors that are not directly related to the people starving, for example, bad growing season due to climate change or destruction of the harvest in a natural disaster. This epidemic is a worldwide issue. “There are 854 million people in the world (about 14% of our population) who are chronically or acutely malnourished” (Sanchez 2). These are a lot of people that do not have enough to eat each day. While in the United States, there are over 60% of the people are obese and a lot of food is wasted (Sechler 3). Other factors that drive world hunger are food prices and distribution of food products. “Governments and donors should continue investing in information technology, including combinations of mobile phones, radio, and the Internet to bring information to producers” (Sanchez 31). New technology can help lower the world hunger rates by a huge percentage because it enables the farmers to produce food more efficiently without any …show more content…
A good government that is not corrupt and has a decent law that is willing to help the ones in need, which will results in good protection. Increasing the incomes of the poor and lowering prices of goods will enable the poor to spend their income on food. This would account for more money for firms to invest in government bonds and expanding their companies, which would lead to economic growth and the quality of life would increase. Another solution to fight world hunger is by improving the environment so that there is proper growing conditions to grow staple foods. An opposition to world hunger is due to overpopulation, which states that a rising population does not cause hunger. Some say that it is the opposite situation, that rising population is decreasing hunger. “Over the 1970s as a whole, despite rapid population growth, the prevalence of malnutrition did not worsen in South Asia or sub-Saharan Africa, and in Latin America and developing East Asia hunger actually declined sharply” (Paarlberg 6). However, logically, it is believed that more people and limited amount of food supply would lead to