Preview

Prohibition in the Late 18th Century

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prohibition in the Late 18th Century
In various points in history, governments have made regulations which many of the people refused to follow. During the late 18th century, prohibition of trade amongst separately colonized islands caused smuggling between these islands to become quite popular. Islands owned by the French, English, and Spanish each had different goods that were sought after, and thus, illegal trade commenced and was very successful. Supply and demand continued as it did because the smugglers stood to gain economically, and because consumers wanted the products they sold, which was often cheaper or rarer than products which were sold legally. The causes of this will be further elucidated by the documents below, as will the responses from both people and governments.
There were various reasons for the smuggling that occurred in the late 18th century. The author of Document 2, for example, states that English merchants were outdone by the low prices of French products. He continues to say that “The English merchants begged me to put a stop to this infamous trade, because it hurt their ability to make money and get ahead.” This reveals that illegally obtained products sold very well, and could be sold for less than products legally obtained and sold by British merchants. By selling products smuggled from France, merchants could attract more business and increase their overall profit margin. Furthermore, French Caribbean Islands had fewer “government expenses,” an important fact presented in Document 5 which explains why French smugglers were able to drop their prices so low. Another reason that people turned to smuggling was because of the inconvenient requirements of being a legal merchant at the time. Document 1 reminds us that master of English ships would have to report to the governor and pay for permission for the goods they would take with them upon arrival at Spanish ports. This information revels that not only did merchants have to deal with competition from French

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Navigation acts- The Navigation Acts were a series of laws that restricted the use of foreign ships for trade between Britain and its colonies, all trade to and from their destinations were required to be carried by a British vessel. They began in 1651 and reflected the policy of mercantilism, which sought to keep all the benefits of trade inside the Empire, and to minimize the loss of gold and silver to foreigners and keep it in the local economy. The acts prohibited the colonies from trading directly with the Netherlands, Spain, France, and their colonies.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit Four Essay

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction, today we will read about how a struggling countries government will step in and help assist using the mercantilist economic system. Situation: the Dutch dominated the shipping channels on overseas trade; monopolizing the financial rewards. The current government, the English, needed to intervene on the Dutch because; they were monopolizing the transatlantic shipping lines like it was their “turf”; and had established business relationships with the Europeans- France and Spain. Their process was to pick up and deliver manufactured products between ports, collect delivery fees, and, employ their own countrymen. Who was benefiting? The Dutch and their European relationships-France and Spain. Who was hurting? The English economy. The English government’s goal: to replace Dutch dominance on the transatlantic shipping lines with English presence. Starting in 1651, four types of mercantile regulations were created and installed to help regulate imperial trade. First application of The Navigation Act of 16512...ref first para..…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of smuggling from the small scale illicit trade of the seventeenth century to the multi-million pound business of the eighteenth century was compounded by several factors. The first of which was the sheer number of people involved in smuggling, whole communities including those in the elite classes were said to be actively or passively engaging in and profiting from smuggling in one way or another. The state’s initial dismissal of smuggling as being restricted to a minority of people meant they were unable to stop its huge growth when it was still viable to do so. Taxation and custom duties also played a major role in the growth of smuggling as the profit gained made it a more lucrative venture for those involved.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article is solely about the Anti-Saloon league, which was the biggest prohibition group. It states how the Anti-Saloon League achieved getting the 18th amendment passed, thus banning alcohol. This is a valid source because the article is on a library site, and the information came directly from books and primary sources. This article will be used to show how the Anti-Saloon league use propaganda to trick everyone into thinking prohibition would be a helpful thing.This article focuses on how prohibition was the politicians fault, it states that most of the politicians involved with prohibition were drinking alcohol and were corrupted. This is a trustworthy source because they have a bibliography, and the article has websites that use primary…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    League. Founded in 1893, it gained traction quickly and became a leading force for its cause.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War was known after its participation in the conflagration, the american was ready to concentrate on domestic affairs (a “return to normalcy,” as 1920 presidential candidate Warren Harding called it) and to turn inward. During the 1920s until the Great Depression of the next decade private concerns preoccupied most americans. 1920s a decade of optimism and 1930s is a decade of depression. American people were creating new way of living by thrusting forces in 1920s. Whereas stock market crashed initiated a long economic decline that accelerated into a world catastrophe the depression of 1930s.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Jazz age, in the 1920’s, prohibition is a law that enforces rules against drinking. Prohibition is the illegal distribution of alcohol from 1919 to 1933. This is created during the 18th amendment to reduce crime and improve the health of citizens. Prohibition created more crime and made a lot of people smoke more as a habit, taking place of their drinking. In the novel, The Great Gatsby, by F Scott Fitzgerald, speakeasies and bootleggers began to sell their own alcohol and make their own money. Because of this the crime rate was high and went against the point of prohibition which was to decrease felonies. Everyone in Gatsby, or most everyone, attended the parties that Gatsby threw and all drank alcohol that he provided. Gatsby is…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the midnight of January 26,1920, America went officially dry. The habit of most Americans was prohibited when the 18th Amendment was passed. The manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within the United States was forbidden. Prohibition was seen as a solution for one of the most serious problems in America which is caused by drinking, but then why did America change its mind? It happened for three major reasons: crime, enforcement and disrespect of law, and economic issues.…

    • 337 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Mercantilism

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is also an example of mercantilism. These trades were between the st Salvador,French and British territory.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    No alcohol! The prohibition act or the 18th amendment in 1920 banned the “manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors” (gilderlehrman) this was a big thing because the consumption of alcohol was a big part of daily life in the 1920’s. The prohibition was known as the “noble experiment” (Mark Thornton) this was because people couldn’t see a life with liquor. Then the idea of prohibition was born because groups like the “Woman's Christian Temperance Union” were very concerned about the consumption of intoxicating liquors in the United States. President Woodrow Wilson was the president during the time and he thought it was a great idea. The prohibition was made to “reduce the tax burden created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene in America” (Mark Thornton).…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you ever been to Mardi Gras you would know that it is a very upbeat celebration, at large celebrations there is usually alcohol, but imagine that party without alcohol, would people even come? Prohibition was a ban on production, and sale of alcoholic beverages between 1920-1933. Mardi Gras is a large celebration in New Orleans that celebrates religious sacrifice, and fasting. Mardi Gras and Prohibition are referenced in To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast to the many logical arguments in favor of alcohol prohibition, the one decisive argument against such a measure is purely pragmatic: prohibition doesn't work. It should work, but it doesn't.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The value of money steadily decreased and the availability of hard coin, either in gold or silver, was a rarity. In addition to that, the British took over St Eustatius for unenforced bans against America. They took possession of stores, warehouses, shops, private property including clothing, money, food, weapons, petty cash [Lecture]. Dealing with hardship due to the blockades creating shortages and the British confiscation of goods headed for America, merchants began hoarding their wares or cornering the market by price gouging [Lecture]. Although the government stepped in and moderated price controls, it did not stop the community from demanding a fair price and resorting to violence if negotiations failed. If the merchant refused a fair price, his shop was torn apart, his goods were taken and a fair price was left in it's wake [countryman pg 138]. This was the community's way of asserting their control over the prices of goods. After all, if the merchants were going to allow their greed to dictate others starvation, those “others” would simply take what they needed to survive. Although the common consensus was that it was the responsibility of the elites to take care of the poor in times of economic stagnation, it rarely…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though, one could argue the abundance of failure that came out of the prohibition, it also provided success for Americans in the long run. It was almost could be seen as an American chance to hit the reset button. Giving us the opportunity to take a step back and see the negative side effects we were causing to ourselves. During the Prohibition the consumption of alcohol never stopped, it did decrease significantly. This pattern continued decades after the Prohibition ended. The Prohibition is a piece of history we could learn from: yes; it was a failure, yes; it did increase crime, and yes, those who were claiming to be helping American society threw the idea of Prohibition, were usually doing so to push their own political agenda, it did,…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prohibition

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1919, the Volstead Act outlawed alcoholic beverages with an alcoholic content over 0.5 percent. This topic is debated in the book, Taking Sides; there are two opposing sides to the question, “was prohibition a failure?” David E. Kyvig argues that the Volstead act did not specifically prohibit the use or consumption of alcohol beverages and that liquor was still being provided by gangland bootleggers to provide alcohol to the demands of the consumers. Regardless of the efforts to enforce the law the federal government failed to create an acceptable institutional network that insured the obedience of the people. Even though the consumption of alcohol did drop significantly during the 1920s, the legislation failed to eliminate drinking. On the other hand, J. C. Burnham argues that the enforcement of the prohibition laws were effective in certain areas. The enactment of the prohibition laws led to several positive social significances. For example, during the 1920s, there were fewer people arrested for public drunkenness and fewer people being treated for alcohol related diseases. He concludes that the prohibition was more of a success than a failure. Prohibition led to the first and the only time an Amendment of United States Constitution was repealed more than once. Personally, I think that the Volstead Act of 1919 was a failure and the prohibition laws gave rise to speakeasies and organized crime.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays