Projective techniques in market research: valueless subjectivity or insightful reality?
A look at the evidence for the usefulness, reliability and validity of projective techniques in market research
Clive Boddy
Middlesex University Business School
Projective techniques are often used in market research to help uncover findings in areas where those researched are thought to be reluctant or unable to expose their thoughts and feelings via more straightforward questioning techniques. However, how the findings from projective techniques are analysed and how valid and reliable they are is hardly touched on at all in the market research literature. This paper aims to open this subject up for further discussion and recommends further research into the reliability and validity of projective techniques.
Question: So how do you actually analyse projective techniques? Researcher says: Years of experience in using them and my training as a qualitative researcher has left me with an intuitive knowledge of what people mean when they perform a task in a certain way. (Researcher thinks: I’m tired out after the last group, please ask me an easier question!)
Introduction
For the past quarter-century there has been a growing use of and interest in qualitative market research (Fram & Cibotti 1991; Miller 1991; Catterall 1998) and the concomitant use of projective and enabling techniques (Miller 1991) within it. A review of projective techniques in market research and their analyses, validity and reliability is therefore, arguably, overdue.
© 2005 The Market Research Society
239
Projective techniques in market research
Catterall (1998) notes that the way market research is taught is functionalist, technical and narrow-minded, as if market research does not exist within the wider world of historical and societal events. It is perhaps not surprising, then, given this vocational training background,
References: Anderson, J.C. (1978) The validity of Haire’s shopping list projective technique. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, pp. 644– 649. AQR (2004) Projective and Enabling Techniques, available at www.aqr.org.uk/glossary/index.shtml?projective (29.08.2004). Boddy, C.R. (2004a) From brand image research to teaching assessment: using a projective technique borrowed from marketing research to aid an understanding of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 12, 2, pp. 94– 105. Boddy, C.R. (2004b) Projective techniques in business research: are they useful? National Business Student Research Conference Refereed Proceedings, Curtin University Graduate School of Business, Perth. Catterall, M. (1998) Academics, practitioners and qualitative market research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1, 2, pp. 69– 76. Catterall, M. & Ibbotson, P. (2000) Using projective techniques in education research. British Education Research Journal, 26, 2, pp. 245– 256 Chandler, J. & Owen, M. (2002) Developing Brands with Qualitative Market Research. London: Sage. Colman, A.M. (2001) A Dictionary of Psychology, Projective Tests, available at www.oxfordreference.com (23.07.2004). Colwell, J. (1990) Qualitative market research: a conceptual analysis and review of practitioner criteria. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 1, pp. 13– 36. Cooper, P. (2002) Company Website, available at http://www.cram-intl.co.uk (8.12.2002). Cooper, P. & Shore, G. (1999) Projecting the future. Journal of the Market Research Society, 41, 1, pp. 33– 45. Cooper, P. & Tower, R. (1992) Inside the consumer mind: consumer attitudes to the arts. Journal of the Market Research Society, 34, 4, pp. 299– 311. Dichter, E. (1960) The Strategy of Desire. London: TV Boardman & Co. Dichter, E. (1964) Handbook of Consumer Motivations: The Psychology of the World of Objects. McGraw-Hill. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. & Lowe, A. (1991) Management Research. London: Sage. Ereaut, G. (2002) Analysis and Interpretation in Qualitative Market Research. London: Sage. Fram, E.H. & Cibotti, E. (1991) The shopping list studies and projective techniques: a 40-year view. Marketing Research, 3, 4, pp. 14– 22. Glaser, B.G. (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press. Glaser, B.G. (2001) The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press. Glaser, B.G. (2003) The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description’s Remodelling of Grounded Theory Methodology. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press. Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine. 253 Projective techniques in market research Goodyear, M. (1998) Qualitative research. In C. McDonald & P. Vangelder (eds), The ESOMAR Handbook of Market and Opinion Research (4th edn). Amsterdam: ESOMAR. Gordon, W. & Langmaid, R. (1990) Qualitative Market Research. A Practitioner’s and Buyer’s Guide. Aldershot: Gower. Griggs, S. (1987) Analysing qualitative data. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 1, pp. 15– 33. Haire, M. (1950) Projective techniques in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 14, 5, pp. 649– 656. Hussey, M. & Duncombe, N. (1999) Projecting the right image: using projective techniques to measure brand image. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2, 1, pp. 22– 30. Kay, D. (2001) Going beyond words: how researchers are using projective techniques to better understand people’s view of brands. Marketing Magazine, 106, p. 22. Kennedy, M.M. (1997) So how’m I doing? Across the Board, 34, 6, pp. 53– 54. Levy, S.J. (1985) Dreams, fairy tales, animals and cars. Psychology and Marketing, 2, 2, pp. 67– 81. Levy, S.J. (1994) Interpreting consumer mythology: structural approach to consumer behavior focuses on story telling. Marketing Management, 2, 4, pp. 4– 9. Lilienfeld, S.O., Wood, J.M. & Garb, H.N. (2000) The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 2, pp. 27– 66. Lysaker, R.L. & Bradley, J.E. (1957) What is a pictorial projective technique. Journal of Marketing, 21, pp. 339– 340. Miller, C. (1991) Respondents project, let psyches go crazy. Marketing News, 25, pp. 1– 3. Moller, P. & Alsted, C. (1996) Understanding consumer reactions to cinema advertising in Denmark. Marketing and Research Today, 24, 2, pp. 107– 115. Nancarrow, C., Barker, A. & Wright, L.T. (2001) Engaging the right mindset in qualitative marketing research. Marketing Planning and Intelligence, 19, 4, pp. 236– 244. Richman, J. (1996) Jokes as a projective technique: the humor of psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 50, 3, pp. 336– 346. Robson, S. (2000) Group discussions. In R.J. Birn (ed.), The Handbook of International Market Research Techniques. London: Kogan Page, pp. 297– 316. Sykes, W. (1990) Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: a review of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 3, pp. 289– 323. Tucker-Ladd, C.E. (2001) Psychological Self Help, available at http://mentalhelp.net/psyhelp/chap15/chap15o.htm (9.12.2001). Valentine, V. (1996) Opening up the black box: switching the paradigm of qualitative research. Marketing and Research Today, 24, 2, pp. 95– 106. Will, V., Eadie, D. & MacAskill, S. (1996) Projective and enabling techniques explored. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14, 6, pp. 38– 43. Yoell, W.A. (1974) The fallacy of projective techniques. Journal of Advertising, 3, 1, pp. 33– 36. Zober, M. (1955) Some projective techniques applied to marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 20, pp. 262– 268. 254