The Advocate, the Louisiana based news organization, recently released an article in response to state legislature proposing regulation of body cameras worn on on-duty police officers. The uniform cameras were first implemented in reaction to spreading concern with unclear, high-profile incidents involving officer misconduct and use of deadly force. While the concept of body cameras is an attractive solution for a record of accountability within the law enforcement community, The Advocate questions when and to whom the video data would be made available. Problems of privacy for both the officer and those in interaction with the officer rise from potential footage that could be captured by the cameras. If these videos were to be made publicly…
Let me tell you what results we expect from the body cams. We expect to be able to take a walk in the shoes of this officer. If a gun was pulled on say an individual who at this time was being pulled over for a routine traffic stop. What events lead up to the officer feeling compelled to pull a gun. Was the person violent? Did he or she pull a gun or did a misunderstanding occur? Only with a body came to record every step the officer took leading to the event. And also seeing what actions the victim took in response to the…
The time is 3:00 AM on a Saturday morning and Officer Smith is a couple hours shy of completing his shift. Suddenly, his radio crackles to life directing him to respond to a domestic call in a dangerous area of his jurisdiction. Officer Smith is met in the darkened Livingroom by a bloody and naked woman, and his functioning body camera captures the scene in front of him. As he is attempting to calm the distraught women, his peripheral vision captures a man lunging at him with a metallic object from an adjoining room. Officer Smith leaps aside, pulls his weapon, and fatally shoots the man only to find the metallic object was a broken metal towel rod. Even though his body camera was functioning correctly it did not capture the totality of the event, and the alleged victim fails to corroborate his story. This story relates the cameras’ inabilities regarding privacy concerns, failure to capture the incident as a whole, and camera limitations inherent with its usage. Therefore, instead of pushing for nationwide implementation of body cameras it is likely that other alternatives are required until these issues are resolved.…
Should police officers wear body cameras? A 2013 University of Cambridge study found that when officers wear body cameras, both police and respondents are less likely to use violence. This study indicated a drop in the use of force by more than fifty percent. Body cameras will make the streets safer for both officers and the general public. Continuously wearing the camera will hold the officer accountable for his/her behavior. Also, body cameras can prevent cases like the Ferguson and Baltimore case, where the public was not for sure what had happened. In saying this, police officers should be made to wear body cameras.…
Justin T. Ready and Jacob T.N. Young start their article by listing the benefits of police body cameras to exclude the assumption that they are completely against body cameras. Immediately after, they explicitly state that they are academics and have been studying body cameras for years. This gains them high authority because their views can now be considered exerts' views by their audience, the public. The tone shift from considerate to assertive was quick and was done to convince the audience that these myths are no light issue and must be analyzed. Throughout the majority of the article, Ready and Young address three myths that are mostly logical fallacies.…
Police dashboard have been in use by some law enforcement agencies since the mid19990s. Following the shooting death of an armed black teenager in Missouri, in august 2014, and an officer involved in that shooting protests erupted across the country and community leader called for all police officers to be equipped with body cameras, Th0se officers that wear body camera and it claim that their use will reduce the use of force by police officers and lesson the number of complaints by citizens against the police. Opponent of having citizens wear body camera cite privacy concerns especially if the video recording are made part of the public record. Body camera are on the verge of changing as we know it. A particular thorny questions is wheter officers who use force against individuals should…
There have been a plethora of discussions on whether or not body worn cameras on law enforcement officers are beneficial to the police and public. There are several convincing points on both sides of the argument; overall, police body cameras will be detrimental to police and the public. Body cameras only record a certain point of view, have a lack of quality audio, and are expensive to sustain.…
These devices allow a firsthand look into an incident and give immediate evidence to a case. Heather Ann Myers wrote about a yearlong investigational study of body cameras for law enforcement and said, “The findings suggest more than a 50 percent reduction in the total number of incidents involving use of force.” In this investigation conducted by Chief Tony Farrar, it is clear that body cameras not only traduced the number of occasions where force was used, but also made these situations more clear, in giving video and audio for every situation. In the article “Police Body Cameras: What are the Pros and Cons?” Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum said, “There are certainly benefits . . . in documenting encounters with the public. It provides the context of what happened.” Wexler noticed the benefit of having these cameras and their video at their disposal as well. These cameras help add to the police officers accountability by reinforcing their stories, or in some cases, denying them completely and help eliminate forceful officers from the…
Recently, police departments across the country have received much scrutiny for recent actions. The latest installment to the never-ending saga, that we all follow on the evening news, is the highly controversial topic of police body cameras. These cameras would attempt to provide an officers perspective to difficult situations and might help explain the actions of our police officers. Two recent articles published by the L.A. Times and The New York Times outline the pros and cons to making body cameras standard issue. The article published by the L.A. Times written by Matt Pearce takes a negative stance on the topic. The article clearly outlines the cons to body cameras and provides little insight to their benefits. The article published by…
“ Police Body Cameras ( dash cams ) have been in use by soe law enforcement agencies since the mid-1990s”. Many people debate whether or whether not police officers should be wearing body cameras. Police officers should be wearing body cameras . Police officers should wear body cameras because for one they are able to see exactly what happened,the videos provides lessons, and the video can help protect the victim. To begin with, they are able to see exactly what happened .…
Citizens fear police-centered crimes such as violent assault and murder. Incorporating body cameras for police will help police catch criminals as well as keep police behavior in check, so citizens do not have to live in fear of police. Police…
Yes, police officers should be forced to use the use of body cameras. Police dashboard cameras, commonly known as dash cams have been around for a long time. They have been used I law-enforcement agencies since the mid-1990s. Which was found in Paragraph one. People feel that body cameras will encourage police officers and also citizens to behave better. Also the use of body cameras should both reduce the use of force and lessen the need and the opportunity to lie about it. However, on the other hand critics claim that watching the video will alter the officers’ memory of the incident, and it is important to consider the detrimental consequences police officers of video that contains information directly pertinent to their fate.…
Body cameras are seen as an invasion of privacy, as they provide state-owned footage. When police cameras are on, they will capture everyday civilian and police behavior that does not necessarily need to be recorded. Do all defendants want their arrests recorded? Do all bystanders want to be in those videos when shown in court(5 pro)? Civilians might not want to be video tape, or have there face on camera. Or the public doesn't want to be on camera. It is not practical to have cameras play constantly, there must be guidelines for when police should turn their cameras on and off(5 Pro). There has to be a limit on how long they can have their camera on. They most likely need to turn it on when there around the public or they get a compliant. Cameras also threaten to degrade civic values by turning police officers into walking surveillance tools. This could erode trust between citizens and law enforcement, as well as formalize casual public reconnaissance in a way that the NSA never dreamed of(hilliary). Civilians should trust the police and trust that they will keep the people safe. The camera give us another excuse to not want to trust the police. The police should be truthful and the civilians and they might have more trust in them.…
There have been many complaints about if body cameras on police officers will work or not. There are two people that have different opinions that other people that think body cameras will stop police brutality against police officers. William N. Grigg, and Joshua Krause these people think body cameras on police officers will not work, and will not stop or decrease the violence from police officers. Grigg’s argument is Their arguments are that the officers from the SDPD forgot to turn on their body cameras while on duty. A crime that happened in April, Officer Neal Browder fatally shot a 31-year-old man named Fridoon Zalbeg Rawshannehad, who had been suspected of carrying a knife. After the shooting, no weapon was found, although Rawshannehad was carrying what has been described as “a shiny looking object.”(San Diego Cops…
All of these points give strong evidence of how much are police body cameras needed to exacerbate the confidence society has on the police. Having the ability to watch the watchers it’s a complete new feature technology is providing, we can’t let this opportunity pass. Police body cameras can save jobs, lives, and give evidence in cases that would be unsolved without…